Water Well Site Requirements

If drilling and service personnel require accommodation at the well site a camp will need to be constructed. For safety reasons the camp will be located at a distance from the drilling rig and consist of various types of portacabins. For the camp, waste pits will be required, access roads, parking space and drinking water supplies. 

Historic aerial photographs provide the accuracy and documentation required to compile a precise record of site boundaries, points of access, and adjacent land use. Engineering borings for construction projects in the vicinity of suspected sites are integrated with geologic information to construct reasonable hydrogeologic models to evaluate potential leachate impact on water wells or nearby inhabitants. 

Material Balance Requirements. Regular production testing of individual oil wells is a mandatory requirement for proper production accounting. A good practice is to place a well on a production test 1 day of every month, if feasible, to determine its individual oil-, water-, and gas-producing rates. The results can then be used to allocate that specific well s contribution to the overall producing rates on a monthly basis based upon a fieldwide proration factor. These allocations are updated with each new production test for that specific well. In essence, the total volume of fluids produced at the well sites must be accounted for at the final effluent streams of the treatment facilities (excluding accumulation within the individual vessels). 

The current guidelines require, in addition to a permeability barrier, a minimum distance of commonly 150 m from the nearest water well. To protect surface water, siting on a floodplain is prohibited, surface runoff must be controlled, and the site must be at least 150 m from any body of surface water. If a site does not meet these criteria, engineered modifications in accordance with certain guidelines may be implemented to enhance site conditions. Such modifications frequently involve a liner and a leachate-collection system. 

The water required for general purposes on a site is usually taken from the local supply, unless a cheaper source of suitable quality water (e.g., a river, lake, or well) is available. 

Addition of about 0 04% arsenic will inhibit dezincification of a brasses in most circumstances and arsenical a brasses can be considered immune to dezincification for most practical purposes . There are conditions of exposure in which dezincification of these materials has been observed, e.g. when exposed outdoors well away from the sea , or when immersed in pure water at high temperature and pressure, but trouble of this type rarely arises in practice. In other conditions, e.g. in polluted sea-water, corrosion can occur with copper redeposition away from the site of initial attack, but this is not truly dezincification, which, by definition, requires the metallic copper to be produced in situ. The work of Lucey goes far in explaining the mechanism by which arsenic prevents dezincification in a brasses, but not in a-/3 brasses (see also Section 1.6). An interesting observation is that the presence of a small impurity content of magnesium will prevent arsenic in a brass from having its usual inhibiting effect . 

---