Water molecules around cell

Q.19.2 Describe a molecular model for the organization of water molecules around a cell. Include in your analysis the orientation, structure, dimensions, and composition of the region. 

Some data are shown in Table 6.1. Of course the larger the metal ion, the larger the radius of the hydration shell. An important corollary is that the attraction of a water layer around K+ (as measured by the free energy of hydration AG ) is considerably smaller than a similar layer around a smaller alkali ion. Thus, potassium ions throw off their accompanying water molecules much more easily than sodium ions, if this is necessary to enter a channel of a cell membrane in living matter. Potassium penetrates the cell wall more easily in an ionic channel, since it may pass the channel without a load of water molecules around it. 

Interactions between water molecules and cells, membranes, proteins, etc., are areas that are fruitful for further investigation [66]. For instances, solvation water around proteins is denser than the bulk water [67]. Ice can absorb and entrap albumin (proteins) in solutions [68]. The geometry of the H-bond network within solvation layer differs from the one in bulk water to interact with protein surface. Unoccupied gap exists between the hydrophobic surface and neighboring solvation layer. The thickness of this gap depends on the local geometry of the water-protein interface, and it is a result of maintaining a balance between water-interface interactions and water-water interactions. Existence of this gap is one of the main factors that differentiate the hydrophobic hydration from hydration of the native form of kinesin [67]. 

Concerning the number of molecules in a cleft and around an enzyme, I feel that there is some confusion both experimentally and theoretically. If we consider experiments (e.g., lysozyme), the quoted number for the molecules of water per unit cell change from 150 to 250 according to the authors the number of bound (and therefore seen by X-ray) molecules vary from 5 to 10 (and not the same one) in addition, we recall that H20 can easily be confused with other inorganic small molecules. The theoretical side is equally unclear, if one uses old concepts as the Van der Waals radii, which are not sufficient to differentiate one atom from another during interaction with a given atom. 

DIP and its derivatives are interesting compounds for hyperthermophilic cells to synthesize in response to salt and/or temperature stress. Significant cell resources are necessary to make this molecule, particularly when the intracellular concentration is >0.5 M. With this in mind, one can pose two major questions. (i) What is there about the DIP molecule that makes it a particularly useful solute at high ionic strength and high temperature (ii) How is DIP accumulation at supraoptimal temperatures regulated For the first of these, studies will be needed to see how DIP affects water structure around proteins or other macromolecules. The second awaits the development of genetic systems for hyper-thermophiles, a non-trivial task at this point. 

In an aqueous medium, the hydrophobic interaction plays a very important role. It is the major driving force for hydrophobic molecules to aggregate in an aqueous medium, as seen in the formation of a cell membrane from lipid-based components. The hydrophobic interaction is not, as its name may suggest, an interaction between hydrophobic molecules. This interaction is related to the hydration structure present around hydrophobic molecules. Water molecules form structured hydration layers that are not entropically advantageous. It is believed that hydrophobic substances aggregate to minimize the number water molecules involved in hydration layers. However, the mechanism and nature of the hydrophobic interaction is not that clear. Unusual characteristics, such as incredible interaction distances, have been reported for the hydrophobic interaction, and the fundamentals of hydrophobic interaction are still under debate even today. 

In general, intracellular freezing induced with extracellular ice crystal initiates around -5°C and most freezable water freezes by the time the cells reach -20°C. Thus, freezing injury of the cells should be concentrated in this temperature region. On the other hand, water molecules cannot endure in a supercooled state under —40°C even if there is no seeding of ice crystals. This suggests that reduction of cell viability is restricted to temperatures above -40°C. The results shown in Figure 9, also support this conjecture. 

Li2S04. H2O. This structure provides a good example of the tetrahedral arrangement of four nearest neighbours (2H2O, Li, and 0 of SO4 ) around a water molecule and of water molecules hydrogen-bonded into infinite chains. The orientation of the H-H vector in the unit cell agrees closely with the value derived from p.m.r. measurements. The O-H-0 bonds from water molecules are of two kinds, those to sulphate 0 atoms (2-87 A) and to H2O molecules (2-94 A). 

Translational modes for four rigid water molecules in a primitive cell are classified as Eig + E2g+Aig+E2u+B2u+Big in Ih phase (D6h). According to the dispersion curves obtained from neutron scattering for ice Ih and also by MD calculation by Tse et al. the peaks at 230cm is assigned as Eig + E2g (with almost same frequency) and a peak at 315cm as Aig in D6h. The frequencies of B2u could appear at around 270 cm but it is not seen clearly in Fig.3. The frequencies of E2u and Big are lower than 150cm In XI phase... 

A different model presented by Christiansen and Sloan is based on the fact that water molecules form labile water clusters around dissolved gas molecules. The number of water molecules in each water cluster shell depends on the size of the dissolved gas molecules, e.g. 20 for methane and 24 for ethane or 28 for propane. The clusters of the dissolved species combine to form unit cells. The formation rate of a particular hydrate structure depends on the availability of labile clusters with required coordination numbers. With a mixture of methane and propane dissolved in the liquid water phase, hydrates should form more rapidly than if either methane or propane alone are dissolved in the water phase. This cluster nucleation hypothesis is based on the assumption that the guest molecule has to be dissolved in the liquid phase before getting encased into a hydrate lattice. 

---