Water heat transfer coefficient

Bed-to-Surface Heat Transfer. Bed-to-surface heat-transfer coefficients in fluidized beds are high. In a fast-fluidized bed combustor containing mostly Group B limestone particles, the dense bed-to-boiling water heat-transfer coefficient is on the order of 250 W/(m -K). For an FCC catalyst cooler (Group A particles), this heat-transfer coefficient is around 600 W/(600 -K). 

The heat-transfer coefficient of most interest is that between the bed and a wall or tube. This heat-transfer coefficient, is made up of three components. To obtain the overall dense bed-to-boiling water heat-transfer coefficient, the additional resistances of the tube wall and inside-tube-waH-to-boiling-water must be added. Generally, the conductive heat transfer from particles to the surface, the convective heat transfer... 

Continuous metal hand (heated by forced convection air, IR, direct steam or direct hot water) Heat transfer coefficient from impinging hot air. U = 0.06-0.09 kW/m K air velocity 15-25 m/s 5-50 kg water evaporated/m drying surface 1.5-2 kg steam/kg water evaporated power required is 20-30 kW with values relatively independent of the size. 

Al, hi water heat-transfer coefficients, evaporative cooler, FL/L T ... 

Fig. 17. Heat-transfer coefficient comparisons for the same volumetric flow rates for (A) water, 6.29 kW, and a phase-change-material slurry (O), 10% mixture, 12.30 kW and ( ), 10% mixture, 6.21 kW. The Reynolds number was 13,225 to 17,493 for the case of water.

Steam. The steam system serves as the integrating energy system in most chemical process plants. Steam holds this unique position because it is an exceUent heat-transfer medium over a wide range of temperatures. Water gives high heat-transfer coefficients whether in Hquid phase, boiling, or in condensation. In addition, water is safe, nonpolluting, and if proper water treatment is maintained, noncorrosive to carbon steel. 

Sindlady, heating surface area needs are not direcdy proportional to the number of effects used. For some types of evaporator, heat-transfer coefficients decline with temperature difference as effects are added the surface needed in each effect increases. On the other hand, heat-transfer coefficients increase with temperature level. In a single effect, all evaporation takes place at a temperature near that of the heat sink, whereas in a double effect half the evaporation takes place at this temperature and the other half at a higher temperature, thereby improving the mean evaporating temperature. Other factors to be considered are the BPR, which is additive in a multiple-effect evaporator and therefore reduces the net AT available for heat transfer as the number of effects is increased, and the reduced demand for steam and cooling water and hence the capital costs of these auxiUaries as the number of effects is increased. 

FIG. 11-23 Heat-transfer coefficients for water in short-tube evaporators. °C = (°F — 32)/1.8 to convert British thermal units per hour-square foot-degrees Fahrenheit to joules per square meter-second-kelvins, multiply hy 5.6783. 

Work in connection with desahnation of seawater has shown that specially modified surfaces can have a profound effect on heat-transfer coefficients in evaporators. Figure 11-26 (Alexander and Hoffman, Oak Ridge National Laboratory TM-2203) compares overall coefficients for some of these surfaces when boiling fresh water in 0.051-m (2-in) tubes 2.44-m (8-ft) long at atmospheric pressure in both upflow and downflow. The area basis used was the nominal outside area. Tube 20 was a smooth 0.0016-m- (0.062-in-) wall aluminum brass tube that had accumulated about 6 years of fouhng in seawater service and exhibited a fouling resistance of about (2.6)(10 ) (m s K)/ J [0.00015 (fF -h-°F)/Btu]. Tube 23 was a clean aluminum tube with 20 spiral corrugations of 0.0032-m (lA-in) radius on a 0.254-m (10 -in)... 

Of these special surfaces, only the double-fluted tube has seen extended services. Most of the gain in heat-transfer coefficient is due to the condensing side the flutes tend to collect the condensate and leave the lauds bare [Caruavos, Proc. First Int. Symp. Water Desalination, 2, 205 (1965)]. The coudeusiug-film coefficient (based on the actual outside area, which is 28 percent greater than the nominal area) may be approximated from the equation... 

Ethanol water is a solution of denatured grain alcohol. Its main advantage is that it is nontoxic and thus is widely used in the food and chemic industry. By using corrosion inhibitors it could be made non-corrosive for brine service. It is more expensive than methanol water and has somewhat lower heat transfer coefficients. As an alcohol derivate it is flammable. 

Economic and process considerations usually dictate that agitated thin-film evaporators be operated in single-effect mode. Veiy high temperature differences can then be used many are heated with Dowtherm or other high-temperature media. This permits achieving reasonable capacities in spite of the relatively low heat-transfer coefficients and the small surface that can be provided in a single tube [to about 20 m" (200 ft")]. The structural need for wall thicknesses of 6 to 13 mm (V4 to V2. in) is a major reason for the relatively low heat-transfer coefficients when evaporating water-like materials. 

Control of an evaporator requires more than proper instrumentation. Operator logs snould reflect changes in basic characteristics, as by use of pseuao heat-transfer coefficients, which can detect obstructions to heat flow, hence to capacity. These are merely the ratio of any convenient measure of heat flow to the temperature drop across each effect. Dilution by wash and seal water should be monitored since it absorbs evaporative capacity. Detailed tests, routine measurements, and operating problems are covered more fuUy in Testing Procedure for Evaporators (loc. cit.) and by Standiford [Chem. Eng. Prog., 58(11), 80 (1962)]. 

Employing wood chips, Cowan s drying studies indicated that the volumetric heat-transfer coefficient obtainable in a spouted bed is at least twice that in a direct-heat rotaiy diyer. By using 20- to 30-mesh Ottawa sand, fluidized and spouted beds were compared. The volumetric coefficients in the fluid bed were 4 times those obtained in a spouted bed. Mathur dried wheat continuously in a 12-in-diameter spouted bed, followed by a 9-in-diameter spouted-bed cooler. A diy-ing rate of roughly 100 Ib/h of water was obtained by using 450 K inlet air. Six hundred pounds per hour of wheat was reduced from 16 to 26 percent to 4 percent moisture. Evaporation occurred also in the cooler by using sensible heat present in the wheat. The maximum diy-ing-bed temperature was 118°F, and the overall thermal efficiency of the system was roughly 65 percent. Some aspec ts of the spouted-bed technique are covered by patent (U.S. Patent 2,786,280). 

In work with the hydrogen chloride-air-water system, Dobratz, Moore, Barnard, and Mever [Chem. Eng. Prog., 49, 611 (1953)] using a cociirrent-flowsystem found that /cg (Eig. 14-77) instead of the 0.8 power as indicated by the Gilliland equation. Heat-transfer coefficients were also determined in this study. The radical increase in heat-transfer rate in the range of G = 30 kg/(s m ) [20,000 lb/(h fH)] was similar to that obsei ved by Tepe and Mueller [Chem. Eng. Prog., 43, 267 (1947)] in condensation inside tubes. 

The pipe has also been used for the transfer of heat between two immiscible liquids in cocurrent flow. For hydrocarbon oil-water, the heat-transfer coefficient is given by... 

---