Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Water differences

If extra treatment capacity is not cost effective another option may be to handle the produced water differently. The water treatment process is defined by the production stream and disposal specifications. If disposal specifications can be relaxed less treatment will be required or, a larger capacity of water could be treated. It is unlikely that environmental regulators will tolerate an increase in oil content, but if much of the... [Pg.360]

The presence of chloric(I) acid makes the properties of chlorine water different from those of gaseous chlorine, just as aqueous sulphur dioxide is very different from the gas. Chloric(I) acid is a strong oxidising agent, and in acid solution will even oxidise sulphur to sulphuric acid however, the concentration of free chloric(I) acid in chlorine water is often low and oxidation reactions are not always complete. Nevertheless when chlorine bleaches moist litmus, it is the chloric(I) acid which is formed that produces the bleaching. The reaction of chlorine gas with aqueous bromide or iodide ions which causes displacement of bromine or iodine (see below) may also involve the reaction... [Pg.323]

Atmospheric pressure decreases by approximately 1.0 psi for every 2343 feet of elevation. Elevations below sea level, such as in excavations and depressions, atmospheric pressure increases. Pressures under water differ from those under air only because the weight of the water must be added to the pressure of the air. [Pg.587]

The pK for the autoprotolysis (more precisely, the autodeuterolysis, because a deuteron is being transferred) of heavy water (D20) is 15.136 at 20.°C and 13.8330 at 30.°C. Assuming AH° for this reaction to be independent of temperature, calculate A.Sr°for the autoprotolysis reaction. Suggest an interpretation of the sign. Suggest a reason why the autoprotolysis constant of heavy water differs from that of ordinary water. [Pg.563]

Ward, J.V. 1973. Molybdenum concentrations in tissues of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) and kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) from waters differing widely in molybdenum content. Jour. Fish. Res. Board Canada 30 841-842. [Pg.1577]

An understanding of much of aqueous geochemistry requires an accurate description of the water-mineral interface. Water molecules in contact with> or close to, the silicate surface are in a different environment than molecules in bulk water, and it is generally agreed that these adsorbed water molecules have different properties than bulk water. Because this interfacial contact is so important, the adsorbed water has been extensively studied. Specifically, two major questions have been examined 1) how do the properties of surface adsorbed water differ from bulk water, and 2) to what distance is water perturbed by the silicate surface These are difficult questions to answer because the interfacial region normally is a very small portion of the water-mineral system. To increase the proportion of surface to bulk, the expanding clay minerals, with their large specific surface areas, have proved to be useful experimental materials. [Pg.51]

How can hard water be softened How do hard and soft water differ in their ability to clean ... [Pg.26]

The ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) is an energy technology that converts solar radiation to electric power. OTEC systems use the ocean s natural thermal gradient to drive a power-prodncing cycle. As long as the temperature between the warm strrface water and the cold deep water differs by about 20 K, an OTEC system can produce a significant amormt of power. The oceans are thus a vast renewable resomce, with the potential to help tts produce billions of watts of electric power. [Pg.34]

Difference between log D in octanol/water and log D in alkane/water Difference between log P in octanol/water and log P in alkane/water Rekker or Leo/Hansch fragmental constant for log P contribution Ionization constant... [Pg.3]

Water. As shown in Figure 4, usage of water by soybeans increases steadily to a maximum 12 to 14 weeks after emergence in Missouri. Water uptalce is shown as a percent of the maximum quantity needed and is adapted from data on soil water depletion ( y. Water differs from other soil-supplied growth factors in that it is continually being lost by evaporation. Any water lost by evaporation or plant use at any point in the growing season is permanently lost. Evaporation may result in water movement over considerable distances to plant roots in soil. The depletion zone for water may therefore extend well beyond the plant roots. [Pg.302]

Figure 9.5 Distribution of water in mixtures containing an enzyme on a support suspended in two different organic solvents. The solubility of water is higher in solvent B than in solvent A. When the solvents are compared at fixed amount of water, different amounts of water are bound to the enzyme. However, at fixed water activity, the same amount of water is bound to the enzyme in the two solvents and a good evaluation of other solvent effects can be made. Figure 9.5 Distribution of water in mixtures containing an enzyme on a support suspended in two different organic solvents. The solubility of water is higher in solvent B than in solvent A. When the solvents are compared at fixed amount of water, different amounts of water are bound to the enzyme. However, at fixed water activity, the same amount of water is bound to the enzyme in the two solvents and a good evaluation of other solvent effects can be made.
Preparation of Protease-Treated Proteins. The proteolysis of soy isolate was carried out by introducing 6 mL pronase E (mg/mL) to a well dispersed mixture of 12 g Mira Pro 111 in 760 mL water. Different levels of proteolysis were achieved by reaction at 50 °C for various periods of time. The reaction was stopped by heating at 100 C for 3 min, and the modified protein was then recovered by lyophilization. [Pg.182]

It is not unusual that relative basicities in gas phase and water differ because of the solvation... [Pg.419]

The computed internal energy of the water differs considerably for the different computational methods. The McCoy method produces a bubble internal energy which is much smaller than that computed by the other two methods... [Pg.93]

Chemical shifts of bulk and coordinated water differ and as a result, the line width at half-height can be used to calculate the rate of chemical exchange. If reactions are slow, NMR methods can be used directly to determine reaction rates since one need only follow the isotopic enrichment of a complex. [Pg.816]

Singlet lifetimes, fluorescence quantum yields, and singlet oxygen quantum yields are compared for Rose Bengal, Erythrosin, Eosin, and fluorescein in a number of different solvents in Table 11. In virtually every case water differs from the other solvents studied. [Pg.357]

The coordination chemistry of sea water represents a new and useful approach to understanding the chemical properties of sea water. The coordination chemistry of sea water differs from contemporary coordination chemistry in the following respects most complexes involve pretransition metals, most complexes are labile, the ligands are simpler (water, hydroxide, chloride, carbonate, sulfate), and time and space are important parameters. Principles of coordination chemistry are applied to contemporary research in marine science in four areas analysis of constituents of natural waters, the nature of metallic species in the oceans, the Red Tide problem, and carbonate geochemistry. [Pg.261]

The results obtained with sodium and water differ somewhat from those described above. Three runs were made, and except for three traces of the last run only a single rate was observed. Figure 3 shows a plot of log k (where k is the pseudo-first-order rate constant) vs. log [water concentration]. The order in water found from this plot is 1.6 compared to a value of 1.1 for the slowest rate of cesium with water also shown in Figure 3. [Pg.174]

The results for the CCcu, reported in this paper, compare well with the literature data summarized by Kramer (1986) most values found for offshore waters differ not more than one order of magnitude, regardless the technique used. [Pg.25]

Shapiro, J. 1967. Yellow organic acids of lake water Differences in their composition and behavior. In Chemical Environment in the Aquatic Habitat (H. L. Golterman and R. S. Clymo, Eds.), pp. 202-216. North-Holland, Amsterdam. [Pg.212]


See other pages where Water differences is mentioned: [Pg.666]    [Pg.756]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.1378]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.798]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.869]    [Pg.2220]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.234]   


SEARCH



Comparison of Different Organic Solvent-Water Systems

Cooling water mass flow rate (Hydrogen only) at different pressures

Methanol-water vapor composition difference

Nafion different water contents

Solvent/water systems, different

Typical cooling tower performance curves for different water loadings

Water different uses

Water transport with different anisotropic fiber directions of the GDL

© 2024 chempedia.info