Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Wall flux density

Wall flux density (area-related collision rate). A measure of the rate of flow of matter from one part of a system to another is given by the flux (flow rate per unit area). For the transportation of matter, this is given by ... [Pg.11]

The pore wall consists of metal oxides. Its reactive part is consumed in proportion to depth because of metabolic activity within a biofilm. The biofilm separates the bulk solution from the pore wall. The horizontal biofilm concentration profiles on the left side of Figure 6 correspond to the center of each of the five boxes. (Concentration is on the vertical axis and biofilm thickness is on the horizontal axis.) Excess organic matter is assumed within the upper few centimeters. The arrows indicate net flux densities of various substances in and out of the biofilm. [Pg.385]

For the concentration profile of a sample which has been driven towards the accumulation wall by the physical field, the general transport theory yields for the flux density Jx of the solute ... [Pg.82]

A reliable determination of hydrocarbon fluxes is a vital task since the introduction of carbon as a PFC in fusion plasma devices. However, what looked promising after the work of [16,28] has turned out to be a real nightmare in plasma-wall interaction research. A taste of that is seen in Fig. 6.7 where the dependence of chemical erosion yields evaluated in different devices on ion flux density is plotted using the published D/XB-values for CD. Even stronger discrepancies from the general trend have been reported in [29,30]. [Pg.144]

The rate of water vapor diffusion per unit leaf area, Jw> equals the difference in water vapor concentration multiplied by the conductance across which Acm occurs (// = g/Ac - Eq. 8.2). In the steady state (Chapter 3, Section 3.2B), when the flux density of water vapor and the conductance of each component are constant with time, this relation holds both for the overall pathway and for any individual segment of it. Because some water evaporates from the cell walls of mesophyll cells along the pathway within the leaf, is actually not spatially constant in the intercellular airspaces. For simplicity, however, we generally assume that Jm, is unchanging from the mesophyll cell walls out to the turbulent air outside a leaf. When water vapor moves out only across the lower epidermis of the leaf and when cuticular transpiration is negligible, we obtain the following relations in the... [Pg.385]

In contrast, a dPIdx of only -0.02 MPa m-1 is needed for the same Jv in the xylem element with a 20-pm radius. Thus, the dPIdx for Poiseuille flow through the small interstices of a cell wall is over 107 times greater than that for the same flux density through the lumen of the xylem element. Because of the tremendous pressure gradients required to force water through the small interstices available for solution conduction in the cell wall, fluid cannot flow rapidly enough up a tree in its cell walls — as has been suggested — to account for the observed rates of water movement. [Pg.475]

Figure 7. Heat flux density as function of the wall superheat. Figure 7. Heat flux density as function of the wall superheat.
Figure 16. Heat flux density vs. wall superheat 1-experiment, 2- boiling calculation by [13], 3-convection... Figure 16. Heat flux density vs. wall superheat 1-experiment, 2- boiling calculation by [13], 3-convection...
Figure 10 presents the interface shape of the rivulet for wall superheat as 0.5 K and Re = 2.5. Here also presented the data on pressure in liquid and heat flux density in rivulet cross-section. The intensive liquid evaporation in near contact line region causes the interface deformation. As a result the transversal pressure gradient creates the capillarity induced liquid cross flow in direction to contact line. Finally the balance of evaporated liquid and been bring by capillarity is established. This balance defines the interface shape and apparent contact angle value.For the inertia flow model, the solution is obtained from a non-stationary system of equations, i.e., it is time-dependable. In this case the disturbances in flow interface can create the wave flow patterns. The solutions of unsteady state liquid spreading on heat transfer surface without and with evaporation are presented on Fig. 11. When the evaporation is not included (for zero wall superheat) the wave pattern appears on the interface. When the evaporation includes, the apparent contact angle increase immediately and deform the interface. It causes the wave suppression due to increasing of the film curvature. Figure 10 presents the interface shape of the rivulet for wall superheat as 0.5 K and Re = 2.5. Here also presented the data on pressure in liquid and heat flux density in rivulet cross-section. The intensive liquid evaporation in near contact line region causes the interface deformation. As a result the transversal pressure gradient creates the capillarity induced liquid cross flow in direction to contact line. Finally the balance of evaporated liquid and been bring by capillarity is established. This balance defines the interface shape and apparent contact angle value.For the inertia flow model, the solution is obtained from a non-stationary system of equations, i.e., it is time-dependable. In this case the disturbances in flow interface can create the wave flow patterns. The solutions of unsteady state liquid spreading on heat transfer surface without and with evaporation are presented on Fig. 11. When the evaporation is not included (for zero wall superheat) the wave pattern appears on the interface. When the evaporation includes, the apparent contact angle increase immediately and deform the interface. It causes the wave suppression due to increasing of the film curvature.
However, the available flux densities often result from several contributions as for example the sum of radiation from a hot wall and exchange with a hot gas. Having in mind that the equation (5) related to this last process represents a minimum (qco can be much higher in the case of high particle Reynolds numbers), the values of q, + qco can approach the limit flux density deflned in this work. In these conditions, we can expect that low char fractions will be formed. [Pg.1042]

Here J and J are the transmembrane fluid and solute flux densities Xp and Att are the hydrostatic and osmotic pressure differences (inside minus outside) across the fiber wall C is the "wall" concentration i.e., solute concentration ImmeSiately adjacent to the solution-membrane interface within the fiber annulus C is local filtrate or product concentration at the outer surfice of the fiber and 8 is the transmembrane Pdcldt... [Pg.75]

Boundary Layer Theory. The Reynolds number for flow-through hollow fibers during our experiments was at most about 0.02 cm (diameter) x 4 cm/sec (velocity) x 1.0 g/cm (density)/ 0.007 poise (viscosity) 11 therefore, a boundary layer theory is needed for laminar flow in tubes. Because of its simplicity, the most attractive available theory is an approximate result of thln-film theory. This theory is restricted to a description of boundary layers that are thin in comparison to the tube radius. Furthermore, the ultrafiltrate velocity, J, must not vary along the tube length (uniform-wall-flux theory). At the centerline or axis of the fiber, the impermeable solute concentration C = C... [Pg.77]

As seen from the Eq. (9), accomplishment of the value (9 o)max requires both increasing the near-wall zone permeability Kf, and decreasing the radius of pores involved in the vaporization process. It is known that bidisperse pore stmetures provide maximum heat flux densities at the highest efficiency [25]. Decrease of circumferential channel dimensions (a and b) also causes increasing of ( o)max, however, it also escalating the entire hydraulic resistance inside the LHP. In certain conditions, it plays the major role in heat flow Q and heat flux qo limitations before the value ( o)max is attained. [Pg.129]

Fig. 17 SEM picture of a hole etched by the SR beam at a low flux density and without preheating of PTFE, showing the fiber-like structures on the etched wall to make the hole ill-defined... Fig. 17 SEM picture of a hole etched by the SR beam at a low flux density and without preheating of PTFE, showing the fiber-like structures on the etched wall to make the hole ill-defined...
When there is a supporting electrolyte, one can show that the migration currents are negligible for the electroactive species when compared to their diffusion currents . In addition, the normal component of the convection flux density at the interface is inevitably zero the electrode constitutes an impervious wall for the overall movement of the electrolyte medium. Therefore when there is a supporting electrolyte, one should only take into account the normal component of the interfacial diffusion flux density for an electroactive species. [Pg.211]

At a pressure of 0.06 MPa coolant boiling started at a heat flux density of 117000 W/m (coolant flowrate through bundle subassembly being 0.76 m /hr). At a heat flux density less than 133000 W/m there was observed a steady process of heat removal due to coolant boiling. At an increase of the heat flux density up to 150000 W/m the process of boiling became pulsating, flowrate periodically decreased almost to zero, then sharply increased, splashes of wall temperature up to 90 °C were observed. [Pg.203]

In the boimdary plasma or edge plasma, the plasma density and temperature are much lower than in the core. The areas where the SOL hits the wall are relatively small so that the particle and power flux densities to these areas are very high. Plasma—wall-interaction processes are mainly determined by these areas. Two concepts have been developed to control plasma-surface interaction to some extent. The first one is the limiter concept. The limiter is... [Pg.2777]

Over a height dZ, the flux density reaching the wall is ... [Pg.109]


See other pages where Wall flux density is mentioned: [Pg.29]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.725]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.725]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.611]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.2389]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.713]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.723]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.2332]    [Pg.2788]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.11 ]




SEARCH



Flux density

© 2024 chempedia.info