Valence state, promotion

Group IIB elements bond energies of, 11 316 heats of atomization, 11 313 ionization potentials, 11 310, 311 valence state promotion energies, 11 311, 312... 

Secondary atomic properties as those, which require, in addition to the experimentally determined quantities for the free atoms, theoretical concepts of the quantum mechanical characerisation of the electronic structure of the atoms. These are orbitals, the shell structure of atoms with emphasis of the valence shell as well as concepts like hybridisation, the definition of the valence state and the valence state promotion energy in its relation to the spectroscopic term values of the free atoms. 

Using the definitions of the orbital electronegativity presented in eqs. (3.5, 4.10 and 4.11) together with the latest experimental values for the ionisation potentials, electron affinities and term values for the atoms, an extensive reevaluation of the atomic valence state promotion energies and electronegativities has been carried out[28-30]. The results obtained are presented in Chart 1 and in more detail in Table 1. 

Under polymerisation conditions, the active center of the transition-metal haHde is reduced to a lower valence state, ultimately to which is unable to polymerise monomers other than ethylene. The ratio /V +, in particular, under reactor conditions is the determining factor for catalyst activity to produce EPM and EPDM species. This ratio /V + can be upgraded by adding to the reaction mixture a promoter, which causes oxidation of to Examples of promoters in the eadier Hterature were carbon tetrachloride, hexachlorocyclopentadiene, trichloroacetic ester, and hensotrichloride (8). Later, butyl perchlorocrotonate and other proprietary compounds were introduced (9,10). 

Halogenation and dehalogenation are catalyzed by substances that exist in more than one valence state and are able to donate and accept halogens freely. Silver and copper hahdes are used for gas-phase reactions, and ferric chloride commonly for hquid phase. Hydrochlorination (the absoration of HCl) is promoted by BiCb or SbCl3 and hydrofluorination by sodium fluoride or chromia catalysts that form fluorides under reaction conditions. Mercuric chloride promotes addition of HCl to acetylene to make vinyl chloride. Oxychlori-nation in the Stauffer process for vinyl chloride from ethylene is catalyzed by CuCL with some KCl to retard its vaporization. 

This gives rise to dual valency state (+3 and +4) (23). As to the activity of lanthanide based catalysts we confirm a singular behavior that has been already reported by Chinese scientists (22) and that is summarized in Fig. 9. The activity of lanthanides in promoting the polymerization of butadiene and isoprene shows a large maximum centered on neodymium, the only exception being represented by samarium and europium that are not active, reasonably because they are reduced to bivalent state by aluminum alkyls, as pointed out by Tse-chuan and associates (22). 

Finally it has been pointed out that, within the same transition period, the trend in >m.Co is obscured by the different promotion energies to the valence state and a trend different to that in Table 5 has been calculated for the first period (Cr = 54.2 Fe = 58.7 Ni = 45.6 kcal mol" 1) 22SK A similar effect probably occurs on descending a subgroup. 

Thus, transition metal cations in the lower valence state may also act as Lewis bases. Factors that affect the reactions promoted by Lewis acidity are listed in Table I. Lewis acid sites reversibly adsorb water (6s 9, 42), which may thus strongly compete with organic compounds that have weaker Lewis base properties, such as aromatic hydrocarbons. Lewis acidity depends on the degree of hydration and is strongest under desiccating conditions. Examples of reactions that are promoted by Lewis acidity are summarized in Table II. Other examples have been reviewed by Solomon and Howthorne (37). 

Figure 5.8. Lanthanide Ln203 oxides (cubic cI80-Mn2O3 type, on the left side) and Pb alloys (LnPb3, cubic cP4-type, on the right). The trends of the lattice parameter and of the heat of formation are shown (see the text and notice the characteristic behaviour of Eu and Yb). A schematic representation of the energy difference between the divalent and trivalent states of an ytterbium compound is shown. Apromff represents the promotion energy from di- to trivalent Yb metal, A,//11, and Ar/Ynl are the formation enthalpies of a compound in the two cases in which there is no valence change on passing from the metal to the compound the same valence state (II or III) is maintained.

Electronic ligand effects are highly predictable in oxidative addition reactions a-donors strongly promote the formation of high-valence states and thus oxidative additions, e.g. alkylphosphines. Likewise, complexation of halides to palladium(O) increases the electron density and facilitates oxidative addition [11], Phosphites and carbon monoxide, on the other hand, reduce the electron density on the metal and thus the oxidative addition is slower or may not occur at all, because the equilibrium shifts from the high to the low oxidation state. In section 2.5 more details will be disclosed. 

Though the core expansion leads to the appropriate fit, it may not be the proper explanation for the scale factor discrepancy. Hansen et al. (1987) note that the expansion of the core would lead to a decrease of 7.5 eV in the kinetic energy of the core electrons, at variance with the HF band structure calculations of Dovesi et al. (1982), which show the decrease to be only about 1.5 eV. An alternative interpretation by von Barth and Pedroza (1985) is based on the condition of orthogonality of the core and valence wave functions. The orthogonality requirement introduces a core-like cusp in the s-like valence states, but not in the p-states. Because of the promotion of electrons from s - p in Be metal, the high-order form factor for the crystal must be lower than that for the free atom. It is this effect that can be mimicked by the apparent core expansion. 

In a) and P) the non bonding-hypothesis for 5 f electrons is retained, differences in cohesive energy being only due to promotion of outer electrons from one to another orbital state and ionization energies (or electron affinities) due to the different valence states attained. Therefore, any further discrepancy found with experimental values, is indicative of the metallic bonding introduced by delocalization of the 5f electrons (point y). 

The model employed for the core-level excitation runs as follows a) the process of photoemission is a two-step process one electron is photoemitted from a conduction state at the Fermi level, and one electron is promoted from a core to a valence state of the solid ... 

It was pointed out in Section 4-2 that the configuration sp8, which has promotion energy about 200 kcal/mole relative to the ground configuration 2s22p2, is the basis of the quadrivalent state of the carbon atom and is shown by quantum-mechanical calculations for methane to contribute about 49 percent to this valence state. Now let us consider the iron atom, for which spectroscopic energy levels are shown on... 

In the phosphorus atom there is little initial promotion energy The ground stale is tnvalent, as is the valence state. Note that any hybridization will cost energy as a filled 3,s orbital is raised in energy and half-filled 3p orbitals are lowered in energy ... 

Divalent beryllium honds through two equivalent sp, or (Sgonal, hybrids. The appropriate ionization energy therefore is not that of ground state beryllium, ls2 2. hut an average of those energies necessary to remove electrons from the promoted, valence state ... 

Wynberg studied stereochemistry of the McMurry reductive dimerization of camphor in detail (64). In Scheme 37, A and B are homochiral dimerization products derived by the low-valence Ti-promoted reduction, while C and D are achiral heterochiral dimers. The reaction of racemic camphor prefers homochiral dimerization (total 64.9%) over the diastereomeric heterochiral coupling (total 35.1 %). Similarly, as illustrated in Scheme 38, oxidative dimerization of the chiral phenol A can afford the chiral dimers B and C (and the enantiomers) or the meso dimer D. In fact, a significant difference is seen in diastereoselectivity between the enaritiomerically pure and racemic phenol as starting materials. The enantiomerically pure S substrate produces (S,S)-B exclusively, while the dimerization of the racemic substrate is not stereoselective. In the latter case, some indirect enantiomer effect assists the production of C, which is absent in the former reaction. Thus, it appears that, even though the reagents and reaction conditions are identical, the chirality of the substrate profoundly affects the stability of the transition state. 

---