Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

V surface

At the time the experiments were perfomied (1984), this discrepancy between theory and experiment was attributed to quantum mechanical resonances drat led to enhanced reaction probability in the FlF(u = 3) chaimel for high impact parameter collisions. Flowever, since 1984, several new potential energy surfaces using a combination of ab initio calculations and empirical corrections were developed in which the bend potential near the barrier was found to be very flat or even non-collinear [49, M], in contrast to the Muckennan V surface. In 1988, Sato [ ] showed that classical trajectory calculations on a surface with a bent transition-state geometry produced angular distributions in which the FIF(u = 3) product was peaked at 0 = 0°, while the FIF(u = 2) product was predominantly scattered into the backward hemisphere (0 > 90°), thereby qualitatively reproducing the most important features in figure A3.7.5. [Pg.878]

King, C. V., Surface Chemistry of Metals and Semiconductors, editor H. C. Gatos, John Wiley, New York, 357 (1959)... [Pg.333]

Mirovsky Y, Tenne R, Cahen D, Sawatzky G, Polak M (1985) Ternary chalcogenide-based photoelectrochemical cells V. Surface Analyses of the CulnX2/aqueous polysulfide interface (X = S, Se) by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy Absence of Se/S exchange in the CulnSe2/Sn system. J Electrochem Soc 132 1070-1076... [Pg.300]

The binding enetgy values are referred to Si2p( 102,6 e V) except in SiO diete the reference was Si2p (103.8 e V). Surface Co/Si ratio calculated from XPS data experimental. Sur ce Si/Al ratio for all the exchanged mordenites was... [Pg.636]

For ail samples, both a.p. and s.o., irrespective of the preparation method, the experimental intensity ratios, V2p/Zr3d, increased proportionally to the V-content up to 3 atoms nm 2 (pjg 2). The ratio approaches those calculated with the spherical model proposed recently by Cimino et al. [27] (full line in Fig. 2). For ZV samples with V-content < 3 atoms nm 2, this finding shows that vanadium species are uniformly spread on the Zr02 surface. On ZV catalysts with a larger V content (not shown in Fig. 2), the intensity ratios were markedly larger than the corresponding values yielded by the spherical model. The results obtained on samples with V-content > 3 atoms nm 2 point therefore to a V surface enrichment. [Pg.694]

Often, the concept of (two-dimensional) surface or (three-dimensional) space charge is employed. Here it is assumed that the charge is distributed in a continuous fashion (smeared out) over the surface S or volume V. Surface and space charge can be described in terms of surface-charge density = dQldS or space-charge density Qy = dQldV, which may either be constant or vary between points. [Pg.22]

The above equations describe a three-dimensional T-P-v surface which is a representation of all the experimental or statistical mechanical information concerning the EoS of the system. It should also be noted that it is observed experimentally that... [Pg.227]

Greek Letters he t. Concentration overpotential (V) Surface overpotential (V)... [Pg.310]

Tarabara V.V., Nabiev I.R., Feofanov A.V., Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) study of mercaptoethanol monolayer assemblies on silver citrate hydrosol. Preparation and characterization of modified hydrosol as a SERS-active substrate, Langmuir 1998 14 1092-1098. [Pg.255]

Kiselev, A. V., Surface Chemical Compounds and Their Role in Adsorption Phenomena, Moscow University Press, 1957 transl. by U.S. At. Energy Comm., AEC-tr-3750, p. 93. [Pg.721]

Most of the early work concentrated on an ESR signal that appears when the hexavalent catalyst is partially reduced by H2 or CO. This y-phase resonance is generally attributed to a Cr(V) surface species (25, 26), although some insist that it involves a combination of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) (10,11,27). Usually these studies found either a correlation or a reverse correlation between this signal and some measure of polymerization activity, often from a catalyst bearing little resemblance to those used commercially. This was indirect evidence at best, and the issue was always clouded by the simultaneous presence of several oxidation states. This work has already been summarized adequately (28-30). [Pg.54]

V Surface Characterisation, A quantitative analysis of the amounts of PAA associated with the latices was obtained by conductometric titration and a qualitative analysis of its behaviour by potentiometric titration. Titrations were performed under a nitrogen atmosphere using a Radiometer Autoburette system and a M64 pH meter together with a Wayne Kerr B642 Bridge. [Pg.162]

For a given geometry of the set-up, the relevance list for this problem contains the power consumption, P, as the target quantity, the stirrer diameter, d, as the characteristic length and a number of physical properties of the liquid and the gas (the latter are marked with an apostrophe) Densities, p and p, kinematic viscosities, v and v, surface tension, a, and an unknown number of still unknown physical properties, S, which describe the coalescence behaviour of finely dispersed gas bubbles and by this, indirectly, their hold-up in the liquid. The process parameters are the stirrer speed, n, and the gas throughput, q, which can be adjusted independently, as... [Pg.105]

Fig. 4 General solution for the dispersion equation on water at 25 °C. The damping coefficient a vs. the real capillary wave frequency o> , for isopleths of constant dynamic dilation elasticity ed (solid radial curves), and dilational viscosity k (dashed circular curves). The plot was generated for a reference subphase at k = 32431 m 1, ad = 71.97 mN m-1, /i = 0mNsm 1, p = 997.0kgm 3, jj = 0.894mPas and g = 9.80ms 2. The limits correspond to I = Pure Liquid Limit, II = Maximum Velocity Limit for a Purely Elastic Surface Film, III = Maximum Damping Coefficient for the same, IV = Minimum Velocity Limit, V = Surface Film with an Infinite Lateral Modulus and VI = Maximum Damping Coefficient for a Perfectly Viscous Surface Film... Fig. 4 General solution for the dispersion equation on water at 25 °C. The damping coefficient a vs. the real capillary wave frequency o> , for isopleths of constant dynamic dilation elasticity ed (solid radial curves), and dilational viscosity k (dashed circular curves). The plot was generated for a reference subphase at k = 32431 m 1, ad = 71.97 mN m-1, /i = 0mNsm 1, p = 997.0kgm 3, jj = 0.894mPas and g = 9.80ms 2. The limits correspond to I = Pure Liquid Limit, II = Maximum Velocity Limit for a Purely Elastic Surface Film, III = Maximum Damping Coefficient for the same, IV = Minimum Velocity Limit, V = Surface Film with an Infinite Lateral Modulus and VI = Maximum Damping Coefficient for a Perfectly Viscous Surface Film...

See other pages where V surface is mentioned: [Pg.878]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.265]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.131 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion vs. Surface Controlled Deposition

Electrodeposition vs Surface Hydrophobicity

Interaction of Group V elements with GaAs surfaces

Prashant V., Native and Surface Modified Semiconductor Nanoclusters

Redox and Surface Chemistry vs. Electrode Decomposition

Sticky vs. Roll-off Superhydrophobic Surfaces

Surface vs. bulk composition

© 2024 chempedia.info