US Department of Justice

US Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration (2002). Available at http // www.usdoj.gov/dea/index.htm... 

The US Department of Justice (1999) seeks to support the Application of principles of science and technology to understand problems of crime , and in particular has developed a five-year plan to encourage development of cutting-edge molecular biology methods and tools . 

US Department of Justice (1999), Year in Review, Research Report, August. 

C.R. Newhouser and P.M. Dougherty, Explosive Handling Kit Technical Bulletin 33-72, National Bomb Data Center, US Department of Justice, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1972. 

US Department of Justice, Legal Authorities Supporting The Activities of the National Security Agency Described by the President, 19 January 2006. 

The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 regulates the manufacturing, distribution and dispensing of drugs that have abuse potential. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) within the US Department of Justice is the chief federal agency responsible for enforcing the act. 

Glover, G. J. 2002. Competition in the Pharmaceutical Marketplace. Testimony before the Federal Trade Commission and the US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division. Washington, DC PhRMA. Available at http //www.ftc.gov/opp/intellect/020319gregoryjglover.pdf [Accessed December 20, 2005]. 

Methadone diversion, abuse, and misuse deaths increasing at alarming rate Product No. 2007-Q0317-001. Johnstown, PA US Department of Justice, National Drug Intelligence Center 2007. 

National Institute of Justice, Oleoresin capsicum pepper spray as a force alternative, NIJ, Technology Assessment Programs, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC, 1994. 

US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (1995). Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property. 4 Trade Reg. Rep. CCH. 

Fox 10/12/81, Marcy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, National Association of College and University Business Officers, Omenn, Research Corporation, US Department of Justice. 

US. Department of Justice, Factors in Decisions on Criminal Prosecutions for Environmental Violations in the Context of Significant Voluntary Compliance or Disclosure Efforts by the Violator (Jul. 19, 1991), available through http //www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Current topics.html... 

In preparing for that trial, the US Department of Justice took Col. Smith s deposihon, from which an intereshng development emerged. Smith planned to rehre from the Army in June 1983, after 26 years of service. On October 13,1982,6 weeks before his December 1 announcement that not no more hsh hshery study would be done, Smith had written... 

In October 1929, DuPont signed a patents and process agreement with ICI to exchange scientific and technical information on a routine basis , which was effective until 1948, when the US Department of Justice brought anlitrast pressures to bear, and it was cancelled (it was due to expire in 1949 anyway) [11]. 

NIJ Standard (2011) - 0101.04 Ballistic Resistance of Personal Body Armor, US Department of Justice, Revision A, June. 

Lennard C (2001) Fire cause and fire debris analysis. In Tontarski RE, Jr. (ed.) Proceedings of the 13th Interpol International Forensic Science Symposium, 16-19 October. US Department of Justice. 

Cooper DA (1989) Clandestine production processes for cocaine and heroin. In Klein M, Sapienza F, McClain H, and Kahn I (eds.) Clandestinely Produced Drugs, Analogues and Precursors, pp. 95-116. Washington, DC US Department of Justice, Dmg Enforcement Agency. 

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Rights Division, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC Technical Assistance Manual (Title 1), Americans with Disabilities Act. 1992. The Americans with Disabilities Act, Questions and Answers. 1991. 

US Department of Justice. 2001. Guide for the Selection of Chemical and Biological Equipment for Emergency First Responders. NlJ-guide, Vol. 1. 

Cohen, M.A. (2000), Measuring the costs and benefits of crime and justice, in LaFree G, Measurement and analysis of crime and justice. Washington, DC National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice. 

The US Department of Justice pointed as early as 1974 to the competition between fixed-line and wireless services, when it argued against the FCC allowing the telephone companies in the United States to operate their own cellular networks because the telephone companies, wanting to protect their position in the basic local telephone business would stunt the growth of cellular service and thus prevent it from ever reaching the high capacity and low price where it would compete with their established service (Berresford 1989, p. 726). 

---