Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transport expressions evaluation

Organotypic corneal constructs do resemble the in vivo cornea in many aspects, but they have the drawback of a complex isolation/setup procedure and longer cultivation periods. Additionally, in contrast to the well-established corneal cell lines that have been used for several years, these constmcts are relatively new and further validation of the barrier characteristics and transporter expression/function are needed. Nonetheless, we surmise that both in vitro models are promising tools for evaluating transcorneal drug delivery. [Pg.300]

If the surface reaction between adsorbed ethylene and adsorbed HCl controls the overall kinetics, derive an expression for the rate. Neglecting external and internal transport resistances, evaluate the constants in the rate equation at 350°F from the following data ... [Pg.354]

Evaluation of Available Energy Transport Expressions. Available energy transport relations are seen to be products of thermostatic properties with commodity currents. Given the commodity currents, the available energy transports can then be evaluated by determining the thermostatic properties, using traditional thermochemical property evaluation techniques. References (6) and (7) present convenient relationships for practical evaluation of available energy flows for several important cases. [Pg.21]

In order to evaluate the reaction function, simulations of one-dimensional advective-reactive transport expressed in terms of the travel time rmust be conducted. A series of concentration profiles with respect to t calculated at distinct times ij (i = 1,2,..., ) approximate the reaction function F (Fig. 7.4). The length of the streamtube is given... [Pg.120]

Uncertainty on tlie other hand, represents lack of knowledge about factors such as adverse effects or contaminant levels which may be reduced with additional study. Generally, risk assessments carry several categories of uncertainly, and each merits consideration. Measurement micertainty refers to tlie usual eiTor tliat accompanies scientific measurements—standard statistical teclmiques can often be used to express measurement micertainty. A substantial aniomit of uncertainty is often inlierent in enviromiiental sampling, and assessments should address tliese micertainties. There are likewise uncertainties associated with tlie use of scientific models, e.g., dose-response models, and models of environmental fate and transport. Evaluation of model uncertainty would consider tlie scientific basis for the model and available empirical validation. [Pg.406]

The results of map generation cannot be expressed effectively with the format available here. However, the State of Oregon utilized the map and matrix techniques in their nonpoint source evaluation and as a basis for designing more intensive survey approaches to assessing the impact of human activity on river quality. In addition to reflecting deposition of sediments, the methods can be applied to transport of pesticides, nutrients and trace elements since many of these substances tend to adsorb to the organic and inorganic fractions of soil. [Pg.275]

These derivations yield general expressions for the transport coefficients that may be evaluated by simulating MPC dynamics or approximated to obtain analytical expressions for their values. The shear viscosity is one of the most important transport properties for studies of fluid flow and solute molecule... [Pg.105]

For dilute, teal gases, where ternary and higher collisions can be neglected, the angle of deflection can be employed to evaluate a number of physical properties. Of course appropriate distributions of the values of g and b must be introduced. The resulting expressions for the virial coefficients and the transport properties (viscosity, diffusion and thermal conductivity) are quite complicated. The interested reader is referred to advanced books on this subject... [Pg.79]

The rat intestinal cell line IEC-18 has been evaluated as a model to study small intestinal epithelial permeability. This cell line forms very leaky monolayers with TER of 50 n cm2 and permeability to mannitol of 8 x 10-6 cm s 1. The IEC-18 model was proposed to be a better model than the Caco-2 monolayers for evaluating the small intestinal paracellular permeation of hydrophilic molecules. However, the leakier paracellular pathway is related to the poor differentiation level of the cells and an undeveloped paracellular barrier lacking peri-junctional actin-belt. In addition, due to the poor differentiation the cells have minute expression of transporters and are therefore not useful for studies of carrier-mediated transport [82, 84]... [Pg.99]

Both active and passive transport occur simultaneously, and their quantitative roles differ at different concentration gradients. At low substrate concentrations, active transport plays a major role, whilst above the concentration of saturation passive diffusion is the major transport process. This very simple rule can be studied in an experimental system using cell culture-based models, and the concentration dependency of the transport of a compound as well as asymmetric transport over the membrane are two factors used to evaluate the presence and influence of transporters. Previous data have indicated that the permeability of actively absorbed compounds may be underestimated in the Caco-2 model due to a lack of (or low) expression of some uptake transporters. However, many data which show a lack of influence of transporters are usually derived from experiments... [Pg.114]

Just as we reported in Section III, the transport coefficients are determined by Eq. (124). This does not mean that one would not be able to evaluate such quantities by means of an expression in which the operator (125) figured explicitly (see Severne27). His procedure is equivalent to multiplying formally both members of Eq., (55) by the operator Q( 0). [Pg.365]

Thus, in Chapter 6, the transport equations for /++ x, t) and the one-point joint velocity, composition PDF /u+V, + x. / ) are derived and discussed in detail. Nevertheless, the computational effort required to solve the PDF transport equations is often considered to be too large for practical applications. Therefore, in Chapter 5, we will look at alternative closures that attempt to replace /++ x, t) in (3.24) by a simplified expression that can be evaluated based on one-point scalar statistics that are easier to compute. [Pg.86]


See other pages where Transport expressions evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.116]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.423]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.21 ]




SEARCH



Transporters expression

© 2024 chempedia.info