Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transition structure schematic

Schematic representation of some of the lower frequencies in the ion-dipole complex for the Cl + MeCl m and the imaginary frequency of the transition structure, calculated using a 6-31G basis set. [Pg.300]

Figure 7.29. (Top) Molecular representations based on X-ray structural data of the diazo compound 88N2 and the alkene product 89Z (the migrating hydrogen is shown in black in both reactant and product). (Bottom) Schematic reaction path showing the minimal structural changes in the transition from the diazo compound to the product, via the probable transition structure 88TS. Figure 7.29. (Top) Molecular representations based on X-ray structural data of the diazo compound 88N2 and the alkene product 89Z (the migrating hydrogen is shown in black in both reactant and product). (Bottom) Schematic reaction path showing the minimal structural changes in the transition from the diazo compound to the product, via the probable transition structure 88TS.
The proposed TS models A-F do not only leave many mechanistic questions open, they also look somewhat too schematic. In view of the increasing synthetic relevance of MTO catalyzed epoxidations, reliable prototype transition structures are required for rationalizing and, if possible predicting, reaction rates as well as the selectivity ofthese reactions. [Pg.306]

The schematic representation of Figure 5 illustrates the paths relating one EE intermediate with four cyclopropane structures. An alternative schematic, Figure 6, shows the paths relating one cyclopropane with four EE intermediates by way of six transition structures. In addition to the paths given explicitly in Figures 5 and 6, there are 4 direct paths by way of EF transition structures relating each cyclopropane with one-center epimeriza-tion products. [Pg.482]

Figure 1. Spin structures (schematic) (a) ferromagnetism, (b-c) antiferromagnetism, and (d) noncollinear structure. The shown structure of the Ll0 type the small atoms (with the large magnetization arrows) the iron-series transition-metal atoms, as compared to the bigger 4d/4f atoms. Examples of Ll0 magnets are CoPt and FePt. Figure 1. Spin structures (schematic) (a) ferromagnetism, (b-c) antiferromagnetism, and (d) noncollinear structure. The shown structure of the Ll0 type the small atoms (with the large magnetization arrows) the iron-series transition-metal atoms, as compared to the bigger 4d/4f atoms. Examples of Ll0 magnets are CoPt and FePt.
The liquid crystal melt, which comes into being at the glass-rubber transition or at the crystal-melt transition, may have several phase states (Mesophases) one or more smectic melt phases, a nematic phase and sometimes a chiral or cholesteric phase the final phase will be the isotropic liquid phase, if no previous decomposition takes place. All mesophase transitions are thermodynamically real first order effects, in contradistinction to the glass-rubber transition. A schematic representation of some characteristic liquid crystal phase structures is shown in Fig. 6.13, where also so-called columnar phases formed from disclike molecules is given. [Pg.172]

Fig. 22 Model for surface oxidation of Pt, showing the transition from OH monolayer, through rearranged OH/Pl state, to 0/Pt- PiO structure (schematic) (see Refs. 221. 232). Fig. 22 Model for surface oxidation of Pt, showing the transition from OH monolayer, through rearranged OH/Pl state, to 0/Pt- PiO structure (schematic) (see Refs. 221. 232).
The Diels-Alder reaction is one of the most powerful carbon-carbon bond forming processes in organic synthesis [69]. Considerable experimental work has been carried out to improve the rate as well as the selectivity of Diels-Alder reactions [69]. Theoretical work in understanding this important reaction is relatively small compared to the huge amount of available experimental data (see references in Ref. 17). As a result, the Diels-Alder reaction is well studied, but not completely understood. From our research efforts accumulated over the last few years, we summarize the differences discovered between the computed transition structures of the Diels-Alder reaction in vacuum, microsolvated environments, and fully solvated systems for one of the simplest Diels-Alder reactions, acrolein, and s-cis butadiene, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 4. Molecular origins leading to the rate enhancement and selectivities are discussed, and then are related to the issues surrounding enzymatic catalysis. [Pg.334]

Fig. 30.1. Schematic depiction of the bonding in the transition structure (TS) for the chair Cope rearrangement, showing the diradical resonance contributors (A and C) and the aromatic representation (B). R is the interaUylic distance. Fig. 30.1. Schematic depiction of the bonding in the transition structure (TS) for the chair Cope rearrangement, showing the diradical resonance contributors (A and C) and the aromatic representation (B). R is the interaUylic distance.
Figure 4.23. (a) Schematic showing how torsional strain is affected by the direction of attack on a pyramidalized trigonal center, (b) Linear perturbation of a Morse function that produces small distortions in the ground state can lead to large energy differences in the transition structure. [Pg.150]

Figure 7.13. Transition structure for hydroboration of a cis alkene with Ipc2BH. (a) The alkene substituents must be syn to one of the pinenes (R ). (b) Schematic representation of the lowest energy conformation, (c) Molecular mechanics - derived structure, with the rear (distal) pinene deleted for clarity. Reprinted with permission from ref. [141], copyright 1984, Elsevier Science, Ltd. Figure 7.13. Transition structure for hydroboration of a cis alkene with Ipc2BH. (a) The alkene substituents must be syn to one of the pinenes (R ). (b) Schematic representation of the lowest energy conformation, (c) Molecular mechanics - derived structure, with the rear (distal) pinene deleted for clarity. Reprinted with permission from ref. [141], copyright 1984, Elsevier Science, Ltd.
A concise review of the relative order, mobility, density, and possible types of phase transitions of one-component systems is presented by the schematic of Fig. 2.115, along with the dictionary definition of the word transition. This schematic is discussed in Sect. 2.5 in connection with an initial description of phases and their transitions. More details of the structure and properties of crystals, mesophases, and amorphous phases are given in Chap. 5. Some characteristics of the three types of mesophases are given in Fig. 2.107. Quantitative information on the thermodynamic parameters of the transitions between the condensed phases is summarized in Fig. 2.103 and described in more detail in Sect. 5.5. The dilute phases in Fig. 2.115, the gases, are of lesser interest for the present description, although the ideal gas law in Figs. 2.8 and... [Pg.591]

Fig. 4 Schematic representation of the benzene radical cation Di/Do crossing. This is a cross-section through the conical intersection along Xi shown in Fig. 1. The quinoid structure (on the right) is a minimum whereas the antiquinoid structure (on the 1 ) is a transition structure in the moat of the conical intersection. Mulliken atomic spin densities are indicated in pink next to each carbon atom. Characteristic bond lengths are indicated in blue. Note that feu the quinoid (u antiquinoid structure, there are actually two resonance structures with the unpaired electron and the positive charge exchanged (this is indicated by +/ )... Fig. 4 Schematic representation of the benzene radical cation Di/Do crossing. This is a cross-section through the conical intersection along Xi shown in Fig. 1. The quinoid structure (on the right) is a minimum whereas the antiquinoid structure (on the 1 ) is a transition structure in the moat of the conical intersection. Mulliken atomic spin densities are indicated in pink next to each carbon atom. Characteristic bond lengths are indicated in blue. Note that feu the quinoid (u antiquinoid structure, there are actually two resonance structures with the unpaired electron and the positive charge exchanged (this is indicated by +/ )...
There is, however, an alternative method using diabatic surfaces which can be used to locate the transition structure approximately. We have used this method in our own work quite successfully. The model of interacting diabatic surfaces is represented in three diamensions in Fig. I in a schematic manner. If we have one product-like diabatic surface p that represents the product in the region of the product equilibrium structure P and a second reactant-like diabatic surface , that represents the reactant in the region of the reactant equilibrium structure R, then the transition structure TS lies at the minimum of the surface of intersection of the reactant-like and product-like diabatic surfaces provided the derivative (with respect to nuclear displacement) of the interaction matrix element between the two diabatic surfaces is zero. Thus one... [Pg.162]

Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the structure of the potential-energy surface for a thermal chemical reaction. The dashed curve indicates the minimum-energy path, ini and Min2 are local energy minima corresponding to reactants and products. TS is a saddle point corresponding to the transition structure. IVlax is a local maximum. Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the structure of the potential-energy surface for a thermal chemical reaction. The dashed curve indicates the minimum-energy path, ini and Min2 are local energy minima corresponding to reactants and products. TS is a saddle point corresponding to the transition structure. IVlax is a local maximum.
The diagrams in Fig. 8.1 are purely schematic, no attempt being made to reproduce the separation between the various MOs or even their order. Each substituent is represented by its a bond to silicon, on the assumption that the aryl groups remain intact during the isomerization the MOs of the disilene thus have the same irreps as ethylene. The only new element in Fig. 8.1 is the presence in each of the transition structures of two linear combinations of three-center bonds. Both of these are necessarily symmetric with respect to (r yz) in (I) they are labeled ag and 62 (H) Because the diagram is... [Pg.189]

Micellar structure has been a subject of much discussion [104]. Early proposals for spherical [159] and lamellar [160] micelles may both have merit. A schematic of a spherical micelle and a unilamellar vesicle is shown in Fig. Xni-11. In addition to the most common spherical micelles, scattering and microscopy experiments have shown the existence of rodlike [161, 162], disklike [163], threadlike [132] and even quadmple-helix [164] structures. Lattice models (see Fig. XIII-12) by Leermakers and Scheutjens have confirmed and characterized the properties of spherical and membrane like micelles [165]. Similar analyses exist for micelles formed by diblock copolymers in a selective solvent [166]. Other shapes proposed include ellipsoidal [167] and a sphere-to-cylinder transition [168]. Fluorescence depolarization and NMR studies both point to a rather fluid micellar core consistent with the disorder implied by Fig. Xm-12. [Pg.481]

By far the most common CN of hydrogen is 1, as in HCl, H2S, PH3, CH4 and most other covalent hydrides and organic compounds. Bridging modes in which the H atom has a higher CN are shown schematically in the next column — in these structures M is typically a transition metal but, particularly in the Mi-tnode and to some extent in the x3-mode, one or more of the M can represent a main-group element such as B, Al C, Si N etc. Typical examples are in Table 3.3. Fuller discussion and references, when appropriate, will be found in later chapters dealing with the individual elements concerned. [Pg.44]

Figure 22. Shown in panel (a) is the relation between the bare energy difference e between frozen-in structural states in a glass and the effective splitting e that is smaller due the level repulsion in the tunnehng center. Panel (b) depicts schematically the derivative of e with respect to e, which is used to compute the new effective distribution P(e) of the transition energies. Figure 22. Shown in panel (a) is the relation between the bare energy difference e between frozen-in structural states in a glass and the effective splitting e that is smaller due the level repulsion in the tunnehng center. Panel (b) depicts schematically the derivative of e with respect to e, which is used to compute the new effective distribution P(e) of the transition energies.
Figure 6.28. Schematic illustration of the change in local electronic structure of an oxygen atom adsorbing on the late transition metal rhodium, the DOS of which is shown on the right-hand side. The interaction of the oxygen 2p orbital with the sp band of the transition metal is illustrated through interaction with the idealized free-electron... Figure 6.28. Schematic illustration of the change in local electronic structure of an oxygen atom adsorbing on the late transition metal rhodium, the DOS of which is shown on the right-hand side. The interaction of the oxygen 2p orbital with the sp band of the transition metal is illustrated through interaction with the idealized free-electron...
This case is shown schematically in Fig. 5c. In Eq. (50), qj. are generalized y-photon asymmetry parameters, defined, by analogy to the single-photon q parameter of Fano s formalism [68], in terms of the ratio of the resonance-mediated and direct transition matrix elements [31], j. is a reduced energy variable, and <7/ y, is proportional to the line strength of the spectroscopic transition. The structure predicted by Eq. (50) was observed in studies of HI and DI ionization in the vicinity of the 5<78 resonance [30, 33], In the case of a... [Pg.167]


See other pages where Transition structure schematic is mentioned: [Pg.794]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.313]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.325 ]




SEARCH



Schematic structures

© 2024 chempedia.info