Matrix element interaction

In order to adapt that expression to the problem at hand, we note that interaction matrix elements for shaking and breathing modes are different. Namely, the matrix element AfiV, symmetry index (A or E), is very small for even I + I, while the cosine matrix element, M - = is minor for odd I + I [Wurger 1989]. At low temperatures, when only / = / is accessible, the shaking... 

The interaction matrix element (i varies with the metal for a fixed adsorbate and adsorption site on the surface. The variation between different adsorbates only needs to be included by a proportionality constant,, where x labels the... 

Table 5.2. The NBOs nB and oah and associated orbital energies (en and ea ) of binary B - HAH-bondedcomplexes (cf. Fig. 5.1), with Fna = (nB. F cTAH ) interaction matrix element (note that two oxygen lone pairs contribute to Id-bonding in H2CO- H3N)...

The stabilizing effect of the intermolecular nF—ctcf interaction (Fig. 5.53(b)) can also be assessed by deleting the nF F cTcF ) interaction-matrix element and recalculating the potential-energy surface E s) in the absence of this interaction. 

At this point a discussion of the approximation of the interaction matrix element Hjj, where i and j are MO s, is appropriate. In general, we distinguish two situations ... 

The above equation is the one employed in the CNDO parametrization developed by Pople and co-workers24 Here, 0A and 0B are specific to the atoms A and B and Smn is the overlap integral between two AO s m and n of A and B. The interaction matrix element between AO s, hron, is frequently called the resonance integral of the m and n AO sa ... 

At this point, we have completed the presentation of the key equations which will be crucial to the development of a predictive theory of molecular structure. These equations will form the basis for determining the relative stability of isomers, the relative stabilization of a cationic, radical or anionic center by substituents, etc. On the other hand, the differential expressions (9) to (12) will form the basis for determining how substitution affects the relative stability of isomers, the relative stabilization of cationic, radical and anionic centers, etc. It is then obvious that a working knowledge of Eqs. (1) to (6) presupposes a great familiarity with the key quantities involved in these equations, namely, orbital energies and interaction matrix elements. 

We now enter the discussion of interaction matrix elements, Hy, and the dependence of their absolute magnitude upon the nature of the interacting fragments. We shall consider cases which illustrate the fundamental principles. 

The interaction matrix element Hy can be expanded in terms of AO s as follows ... 

Table 7. Three center interaction matrix elements...

In most cases of interest, Hy/5ey < 1. This implies that for comparable AHy and 1 A5 ey the variations of the interaction matrix element Hy will set the pattern of the variation of SE. 

Fig. 2. (a) Orbital pattern which enforces matrix element control, Le. the 0i - p j interaction is stronger, (b) Orbital pattern which enforces energy gap control, i.e. the i - l/2 interaction is stronger. In both cases, it is assumed that the < 1- 1 interaction matrix element is greater in absolute magnitude than the 1 - 1 2 one... 

We can use an alternative scheme in order to predict the effect of the nature of the atoms A and X on the preferred geometry of AX2 molecules. Thus, for example, consider the MO s of linear H20 which are shown in Fig. 43. Upon bending, the key stabilizing interaction introduced is the interaction between the original lone pair HOMO and the original sigma LUMO. This will increase as the HOMO-LUMO gap in the linear molecule decreases and the corresponding interaction matrix element increases or remains constant. 

Consider the two systems CH2F—SH and CH2F—OH. According to our approach both are predicted to exist in a preferred gauche conformation. However, the extent to which the nx-o F interaction obtains in the two molecules may be subject to matrix element control simply because ns is a better donor than no but yields a smaller interaction matrix element with a F- The variation of these two effects may conceivably be comparable and subject to matrix element control due to the fact that the n—o orbital interaction involves well separated energy levels. Hence, one... 

A pictorial representation of the interaction matrix elements, i e. a pictorial representation of the key orbital interactions responsible for the greater stability of the 1,1 -isomer, is given below. 

---