Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transition state theory , development

Arrhenius classical theory of reaction kinetics is based on the assumption that the starting materials (reactants) have to overcome an energy barrier, the activation energy, in order to be transformed into the products. This picture has been developed and made more explicit in the theory of absolute reaction rates [2-5, 7, 8, 11, 24, 464-466, 770, 771]. The influence of solvent on reaction rates is best treated by means of this theory -also known as transition-state theory, developed almost simultaneously in 1935 by Eyr-ing as well as Evans and Polanyi [464]. [Pg.149]

The electronic partition function is usually equal to unity. In the transition state theory developed by Polanyi and Eyring, the transition complex is located at the top of the energy barrier (Figure 3.2) and the reaction can be presented a movement along a potential energy surface where the transition state is located at the saddle point. [Pg.76]

A collision theory of even gas phase reactions is not totally satisfactory, and the problems with the steric factor that we described earfier make this approach more empirical and qualitative than we would like. Transition state theory, developed largely by Henry Eyring, takes a somewhat different approach. We have already considered the potential energy surfaces that provide a graphical energy model for chemical reactions. Transition state theory (or activated complex theory) refers to the details of how reactions become products. For a reaction fike... [Pg.119]

The transition state theory developed by Eyring and by Evans and Polanyi yields high-pressure rate constants k(T). Since it is based on the same assumptions as the RRKM theory (existence of a transition state and fast complete energy distribution), the results from both theories should coincide. See textbooks for more details on TS theory. [Pg.109]

However, the electronic theory also lays stress upon substitution being a developing process, and by adding to its description of the polarization of aromatic molecules means for describing their polarisa-bility by an approaching reagent, it moves towards a transition state theory of reactivity. These means are the electromeric and inductomeric effects. [Pg.127]

A more general, and for the moment, less detailed description of the progress of chemical reactions, was developed in the transition state theory of kinetics. This approach considers tire reacting molecules at the point of collision to form a complex intermediate molecule before the final products are formed. This molecular species is assumed to be in thermodynamic equilibrium with the reactant species. An equilibrium constant can therefore be described for the activation process, and this, in turn, can be related to a Gibbs energy of activation ... [Pg.47]

The derivation of the transition state theory expression for the rate constant requires some ideas from statistical mechanics, so we will develop these in a digression. Consider an assembly of molecules of a given substance at constant temperature T and volume V. The total number N of molecules is distributed among the allowed quantum states of the system, which are determined by T, V, and the molecular structure. Let , be the number of molecules in state i having energy e,- per molecule. Then , is related to e, by Eq. (5-17), which is known as theBoltzmann distribution. [Pg.201]

A first-order rate constant has the dimension time, but all other rate constants include a concentration unit. It follows that a change of concentration scale results in a change in the magnitude of such a rate constant. From the equilibrium assumption of transition state theory we developed these equations in Chapter 5 ... [Pg.253]

The case of m = Q corresponds to classical Arrhenius theory m = 1/2 is derived from the collision theory of bimolecular gas-phase reactions and m = corresponds to activated complex or transition state theory. None of these theories is sufficiently well developed to predict reaction rates from first principles, and it is practically impossible to choose between them based on experimental measurements. The relatively small variation in rate constant due to the pre-exponential temperature dependence T is overwhelmed by the exponential dependence exp(—Tarf/T). For many reactions, a plot of In(fe) versus will be approximately linear, and the slope of this line can be used to calculate E. Plots of rt(k/T" ) versus 7 for the same reactions will also be approximately linear as well, which shows the futility of determining m by this approach. [Pg.152]

When processes are slow because they involve an activation barrier, the time scale problems can be circumvented by applying (corrected) transition state theory. This is certainly useful for reactive systems (5 ) requiring a quantummechanical approach to define the reaction path in a reduced system of coordinates. The development in these fields is only beginning and a very promising... [Pg.120]

The transition state theory is likely an oversimplification when applied to enzyme catalysis - it was originally developed to account for gas phase... [Pg.27]

As discussed by Miller and co-workers [52,53], it is worthwhile to develop theories that enable us to evaluate thermal reaction rate constants directly and not to rely on the calculations of the most detailed scattering matrix or the state-to-state reaction probabihty. Here, our formulation of the nonadiabatic transition state theory is briefly described for the simplest case in which the transition state is created by potential surface crossing [27]. [Pg.112]

Building on the Lindemarm Theory described above, Henry Eyring, and independently also M.G. Evans and Michael Polanyi, developed around 1935 a theory for the rate of a reaction that is still used, namely the transition state theory. [Pg.108]

DFT has come to the fore in molecular calculations as providing a relatively cheap and effective method for including important correlation effects in the initial and final states. ADFT methods have been used, but by far the most popular approach is that based on Slater s half electron transition state theory [73] and its developments. Unlike Hartree-Fock theory, DFT has no Koopmans theorem that relates the orbital energies to an ionisation potential, instead it has been shown that the orbital energy (e,) is related to the gradient of the total energy E(N) of an N-electron system, with respect to the occupation number of the 2th orbital ( , ) [74],... [Pg.705]

The theory of such processes was developed in an important paper by Ruckenstein and Prieve (1973). Their treatment and the later treatment of Samec (Samec et al, 1986) for the case of ion transfer is essentially the same, and we now develop a simplified and unified model for both systems using the concepts of transition-state theory. [Pg.160]

A well defined theory of chemical reactions is required before analyzing solvent effects on this special type of solute. The transition state theory has had an enormous influence in the development of modern chemistry [32-37]. Quantum mechanical theories that go beyond the classical statistical mechanics theory of absolute rate have been developed by several authors [36,38,39], However, there are still compelling motivations to formulate an alternate approach to the quantum theory that goes beyond a theory of reaction rates. In this paper, a particular theory of chemical reactions is elaborated. In this theoretical scheme, solvent effects at the thermodynamic and quantum mechanical level can be treated with a fair degree of generality. The theory can be related to modern versions of the Marcus theory of electron transfer [19,40,41] but there is no... [Pg.284]

The transition state theory (also known as absolute reaction rate theory) was first given by Marcellin (1915) and then developed by Erying and Polanyi (1935). According to this theory, the reactant molecules are first transformed into intermediate transition state (also known as activated complex). The activated complex is formed by loose association or bonding of reactant... [Pg.89]

Since the discovery of the deuterium isotope in 1931 [44], chemists have long recognized that kinetic deuterium isotope effects could be employed as an indicator for reaction mechanism. However, the development of a mechanism is predicated upon analysis of the kinetic isotope effect within the context of a theoretical model. Thus, it was in 1946 that Bigeleisen advanced a theory for the relative reaction velocities of isotopic molecules that was based on the theory of absolute rate —that is, transition state theory as formulated by Eyring as well as Evans and Polanyi in 1935 [44,45]. The rate expression for reaction is given by... [Pg.70]

In 1967, Dogonadze, Kuznetsov, and Levich began the development of a theoretical model that would account for the full quantum nature of the transferring proton [10, 18, 52, 53]. In contrast to the model based on transition state theory where the quantum properties of the proton are an ad hoc addition to the model,... [Pg.73]

The theoretical aspects of electron transfer mechanisms in aqueous solution have received considerable attention in the last two decades. The early successes of Marcus Q, 2), Hush (3, 4), and Levich (5) have stimulated the development of a wide variety of more detailed models, including those based on simple transition state theory, as well as more elaborate semi-clas-sical and quantum mechanical models (6-12). [Pg.255]


See other pages where Transition state theory , development is mentioned: [Pg.160]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.883]    [Pg.893]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.105]   


SEARCH



Development theory

© 2024 chempedia.info