Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Temperature dependences exponential

Leikin, S., Rau, D. C., and Parsegian, V. A. (1994). Direct measurement of forces between self-assembled proteins. Temperature-dependent exponential forces between collagen triple-helices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91, 276-280. [Pg.336]

The applications of this simple measure of surface adsorbate coverage have been quite widespread and diverse. It has been possible, for example, to measure adsorption isothemis in many systems. From these measurements, one may obtain important infomiation such as the adsorption free energy, A G° = -RTln(K ) [21]. One can also monitor tire kinetics of adsorption and desorption to obtain rates. In conjunction with temperature-dependent data, one may frirther infer activation energies and pre-exponential factors [73, 74]. Knowledge of such kinetic parameters is useful for teclmological applications, such as semiconductor growth and synthesis of chemical compounds [75]. Second-order nonlinear optics may also play a role in the investigation of physical kinetics, such as the rates and mechanisms of transport processes across interfaces [76]. [Pg.1289]

The Arrhenius relation given above for Are temperature dependence of air elementary reaction rate is used to find Are activation energy, E, aird Are pre-exponential factor. A, from the slope aird intercept, respectively, of a (linear) plot of n(l((T)) against 7 The stairdard enAralpv aird entropy chairges of Are trairsition state (at constairt... [Pg.2967]

The time for classical simulated annealing increases exponentially as a function of the ratio of the energy scales /AU. However, for 5 > 1 the situation is qualitatively different. As a result of the weak temperature dependence in the barrier crossing times, the time for simulated annealing increases only weakly as a power law. [Pg.205]

Ideal Performance and Cooling Requirements. Eree carriers can be excited by the thermal motion of the crystal lattice (phonons) as well as by photon absorption. These thermally excited carriers determine the magnitude of the dark current,/ and constitute a source of noise that defines the limit of the minimum radiation flux that can be detected. The dark carrier concentration is temperature dependent and decreases exponentially with reciprocal temperature at a rate that is determined by the magnitude of or E for intrinsic or extrinsic material, respectively. Therefore, usually it is necessary to operate infrared photon detectors at reduced temperatures to achieve high sensitivity. The smaller the value of E or E, the lower the temperature must be. [Pg.422]

The temperature dependence of melt viscosity at temperatures considerably above T approximates an exponential function of the Arrhenius type. However, near the glass transition the viscosity temperature relationship for many polymers is in better agreement with the WLF treatment (24). [Pg.173]

Materials are usually classified according to the specific conductivity mode, eg, as insulators, which have low conductivity and low mobihty of carriers. Metahic conductors, which include some oxides, have a high conductivity value which is not a strong (exponential) function of temperature. Semiconductors are intermediate and have an exponential temperature dependence. Figure 1 gives examples of electrical conductivities at room temperature for these various materials. [Pg.349]

Later, in the 1890s, Arrhenius moved to quite different concerns, but it is intriguing that materials scientists today do not think of him in terms of the concept of ions (which are so familiar that few are concerned about who first thought up the concept), but rather venerate him for the Arrhenius equation for the rate of a chemical reaction (Arrhenius 1889), with its universally familiar exponential temperature dependence. That equation was in fact first proposed by van t HofT, but Arrhenius claimed that van t Hoff s derivation was not watertight and so it is now called after Arrhenius rather than van t Hoff" (who was in any case an almost pathologically modest and retiring man). [Pg.27]

The reaetion rate usually rises exponentially with temperature as shown in Figure 3-1. The Arrhenius equation as expressed in Chapter 1 is a good approximation to die temperature dependeney. The temperature dependent term fits if plotted as In (rates) versus 1/T at fixed eoneentration C, Cg (Figure 3-2). [Pg.111]

The sticking coefficient at zero coverage, Sq T), contains the dynamic information about the energy transfer from the adsorbing particle to the sohd which gives rise to its temperature dependence, for instance, an exponential Boltzmann factor for activated adsorption. [Pg.465]

The temperature dependence of A predicted by Eq. (5-11) makes a very weak contribution to the temperature dependence of the rate constant, which is dominated by the exponential term. It is, therefore, not feasible to establish, on the basis of temperature studies of the rate constant, whether the predicted dependence of A is observed experimentally. Uncertainties in estimates of A tend to be quite large because this parameter is, in effect, determined by a long extrapolation of the Arrhenius plot to 1/T = 0. [Pg.190]

A more interesting possibility, one that has attracted much attention, is that the activation parameters may be temperature dependent. In Chapter 5 we saw that theoiy predicts that the preexponential factor contains the quantity T", where n = 5 according to collision theory, and n = 1 according to the transition state theory. In view of the uncertainty associated with estimation of the preexponential factor, it is not possible to distinguish between these theories on the basis of the observed temperature dependence, yet we have the possibility of a source of curvature. Nevertheless, the exponential term in the Arrhenius equation dominates the temperature behavior. From Eq. (6-4), we may examine this in terms either of or A//. By analogy with equilibrium thermodynamics, we write... [Pg.251]

Hicks (H6) and Frazer and Hicks (F3) considered the ignition model in which exothermic, exponentially temperature-dependent reactions occur within the solid phase. Assuming a uniformly mixed solid phase, the one-dimensional unsteady heat-flow equation relates the propellant temperature, depth from the surface, and time by the nonlinear equation ... [Pg.9]

If a data set containing k T) pairs is fitted to this equation, the values of these two parameters are obtained. They are A, the pre-exponential factor (less desirably called the frequency factor), and Ea, the Arrhenius activation energy or sometimes simply the activation energy. Both A and Ea are usually assumed to be temperature-independent in most instances, this approximation proves to be a very good one, at least over a modest temperature range. The second equation used to express the temperature dependence of a rate constant results from transition state theory (TST). Its form is... [Pg.156]

The rates of C2H4, C2H6 and C02 formation depend exponentially on UWr and O according to equation (4.49) with a values of 1.0, 0.75 and 0.4, respectively, for I>0, and of 0.15, 0.08 and 0.3, respectively for I<0. Linear decreases in activation energy with increasing have been found for all three reactions.54 It should be emphasized, however, that, due to the high operating temperatures, A is near unity and electrocatalysis, rather than NEMCA, plays the dominant role. [Pg.403]

This exponential temperature dependence for k is much stronger than the weak temperature dependence of the collision frequency itself. By comparing Eq. 17 with Eq. 13b, we can identify the term nvrviNA2 as the pre-exponential factor. A, and Emin as the activation energy, Ea. That is, we can conclude that... [Pg.680]

The case of m = Q corresponds to classical Arrhenius theory m = 1/2 is derived from the collision theory of bimolecular gas-phase reactions and m = corresponds to activated complex or transition state theory. None of these theories is sufficiently well developed to predict reaction rates from first principles, and it is practically impossible to choose between them based on experimental measurements. The relatively small variation in rate constant due to the pre-exponential temperature dependence T is overwhelmed by the exponential dependence exp(—Tarf/T). For many reactions, a plot of In(fe) versus will be approximately linear, and the slope of this line can be used to calculate E. Plots of rt(k/T" ) versus 7 for the same reactions will also be approximately linear as well, which shows the futility of determining m by this approach. [Pg.152]

The model [39] was developed using three assumptions the conformers are in thermodynamic equilibrium, the peak intensities of the T-shaped and linear features are proportional to the populations of the T-shaped and linear ground-state conformers, and the internal energy of the complexes is adequately represented by the monomer rotational temperature. By using these assumptions, the temperature dependence of the ratio of the intensities of the features were equated to the ratio of the quantum mechanical partition functions for the T-shaped and linear conformers (Eq. (7) of Ref. [39]). The ratio of the He l Cl T-shaped linear intensity ratios were observed to decay single exponentially. Fits of the decays yielded an approximate ground-state binding... [Pg.400]

Arrhenius proposed his equation in 1889 on empirical grounds, justifying it with the hydrolysis of sucrose to fructose and glucose. Note that the temperature dependence is in the exponential term and that the preexponential factor is a constant. Reaction rate theories (see Chapter 3) show that the Arrhenius equation is to a very good approximation correct however, the assumption of a prefactor that does not depend on temperature cannot strictly be maintained as transition state theory shows that it may be proportional to 7. Nevertheless, this dependence is usually much weaker than the exponential term and is therefore often neglected. [Pg.36]

Note that the apparent activation energy is the activation energy of the activated process modified by the equilibrium enthalpies. Thus the apparent activation energy depends on both the pressure and temperature in this case. Note also that we have neglected any non-exponential temperature dependence. As we shall see in Chapter 3, V, AH, and AS are to some degree functions of temperature. [Pg.38]

Expression (109) appears to be similar to the Arrhenius expression, but there is an important difference. In the Arrhenius equation the temperature dependence is in the exponential only, whereas in collision theory we find a dependence in the pre-exponential factor. We shall see later that transition state theory predicts even stronger dependences on T. [Pg.105]

The reader may now wish to verify that the activation energy calculated by logarithmic differentiation contains a contribution Sk T/l in addition to A , whereas the pre-exponential needs to be multiplied by the factor e in order to properly compare Eq. (139) with the Arrhenius equation. Although the prefactor turns out to have a rather strong temperature dependence, the deviation of a In k versus 1/T Arrhenius plot from a straight line will be small if the activation energy is not too small. [Pg.113]

In order to derive specific numbers for the temperature rise, a first-order reaction was considered and Eqs. (10) and (11) were solved numerically for a constant-density fluid. In Figure 1.17 the results are presented in dimensionless form as a function of k/tjjg. The y-axis represents the temperature rise normalized by the adiabatic temperature rise, which is the increase in temperature that would have been observed without any heat transfer to the channel walls. The curves are differentiated by the activation temperature, defined as = EJR. As expected, the temperature rise approaches the adiabatic one for very small reaction time-scales. In the opposite case, the temperature rise approaches zero. For a non-zero activation temperature, the actual reaction time-scale is shorter than the one defined in Eq. (13), due to the temperature dependence of the exponential factor in Eq. (12). For this reason, a larger temperature rise is foimd when the activation temperature increases. [Pg.37]


See other pages where Temperature dependences exponential is mentioned: [Pg.489]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.219]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.106 ]




SEARCH



Chemical reactions, kinetics exponential temperature dependence

Exponential Dependence

Temperature dependence single exponential form

© 2024 chempedia.info