Total sulfites

Here is a coulometric procedure for analysis of total sulfite in white wine. Total sulfite means all species in Reaction (A) and the adduct in Reaction (B). We use white wine so that we can see the color of a starch-iodine end point. 

Lemon juice, instant mashed potatoes, beer Extraction with Polytron for 1 min, pH 2.0 for free and pH 8.9 for total sulfite Anion exclusion 6 mM H2S04... 

Add a pinch of the total sulfite, dissolve the metol completely and then add the remainder of the sulfite. 

The influence of the sulfite concentration on ip is seen in Fig. 10b. As previously shown, the specific absorption rate decreases as the Na2S03 concentration increases (curve a). However, experiments carried out keeping the initial sulfite plus sulfate concentration constant by the addition of Na2S04 show a less marked decrease (curve b). More careful analysis reveals that the specific rate of absorption is independent of sulfite concentration when the experiments are carried out keeping a constant total sulfite plus sulfate concentration. This is demonstrated by recycling a solution partially oxidized into sulfate through the equipment (curve c). This interpretation may explain the different values of n published in the literature. 

Free and total sulfite in wines were determined using the induced oxidation of manganese(ll) and FIA system [1]. Sulfur dioxide as a product of the reaction of the examined sample with sulfuric acid diffused through a PTFE membrane to a solution of Mn(ll) in acetate buffer of pH 5.5. The oxidized Mn formed reacted with iodide to form iodine that was detected at 352 nm. The DL of 1 mg f was reported. 

Figure 9. Effect of acetate on dissolution rate with 3 mM of total sulfite (pH 5...

The 14 equations, sulfite rate of change in the liquid and the rates of sulfite transfer (in terms of r ) from the 13 sized particles, may be solved simultaneously for and the r s. Then the total sulfite concentration is calculated at each increment of time. In addition, to compute the proper surface conditions for the mass transfer driving force, all of the governing equations for the bulk listed in the section above on the surface conditions during dissolution must be solved at each time step. Two differences should be noted the solubility product for sulfate must now be satisfied and in the Ca2+ and sulfur balance, the effect of oxidation must be accounted for , ... 

In sulfonation experiments the extent of reaction was determined by iodine titration for total sulfite. Solutions initially containing 0.05 to 0.20 M unsaturated acid were maintained at approximate pH values by lactate, acetate, or phosphate buffers. NaCl, CaCl2, or MgCl2 were added to give changes in ionic environment. 

The apparatus used by Chang and Rochelle was modified for this work (17). Heating tape was added to liquid and gas stream inlets to permit operation at 55°C. Gas phase analysis and flow measurement were refined, and S02 absorption rate was determined by gas-phase material balance, permitting operation with high concentrations of sulfate and total sulfite. Tighter pH control was achieved by continuously adding 1.0 M NaOH directly to the reactor. 

Table V gives the calculated concentrations of twelve buffers required to get an enhancement factor of 20 in 0.1 M CaCl2 with 10 mM total sulfite at pH 5.0 with 1000 ppm S02 at the gas liquid interface. Relative costs have been caluclated assuming that makeup rates would be proportional to concentration...

Figure 2. Calculated effect of buffer alternatives on the liquid-film enhancement factor, 0.1 M CaClt, 55°C, pH 5.5, 3 wM total sulfite, 1000 ppm SOti-...

Figure 3. Overall mass transfer enhancement by adipic acid, 55°C, 0.1 M CaCls, pH 5. Total sulfite ---------------,0 wM and-----, 10 mM.

In a typical experiment 5 to 10 samples were analyzed for carboxylic acid and total sulfite. The rate constant, kj, was obtained from a plot of n[A] versus total sulfite. Figures 4 and 5 show results of a typical experiment. 

Sulfite is nemovnd by precipitate flotation with sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate at an optimum pH of 6.6. Removal was 93% for precipitate (CaSOj) sulfite and 85% for total sulfite.17 The simullansous removal of sulfite and carbonate was studied using precipitate flotation as the calcium salts. Removal was 95% or precipitated sulfite aed 97% of the carbonate. 

The mechanism of sulfuric acid formation and scavenging in the Pasadena precipitation samples is also poorly understood. Aerosol sulfate measurements were too few for comparison with the excess sulfate concentrations, the sulfate in excess of that expected from sea salt. Sulfur dioxide concentrations during the storm were consistently 10 or 20 ppb with an uncertainty of 5 ppb. Gas scavenging of sulfur dioxide to form sulfite species and oxidation to sulfate before analysis of the sample could account for a large fraction of the excess sulfate. Equilibrium total sulfite was calculated from PSO2 i s sured at ground level and measured pH,by equations 17-20. 

The calculated total sulfite could account for 20 10% of the excess sulfate where the uncertainty is due to uncertainty in the partial pressure of sulfur dioxide. Oxidation of sulfite species to sulfate in or below the cloud would increase the percent of excess sulfate due to sulfur dioxide scavenging. 

A hybrid SIA-FIA spectrophotometric method for the determination of total sulfite in white and red wines has been reported (Tzanavaras et al., 2009). The assay was based on the reaction of sulfite with o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) and ammonium chloride. Upon online alkalization with NaOH, a blue product was formed having an absorption maximum at 630 nm. Sulfite was separated from the wine matrix through an online gas-diffusion process incorporated in the SI manifold, followed by reaction with OPA in the presence of ammonia. The reaction mixture merged online with a continuously flowing of NaOH prior to detection. The SIA-FIA manifold is illustrated in Figure 2.8. 

Trojanowicz, M., ed. 2008. Advances in Flow Analysis. Weinheim Wiley-VCH. Tzanavaras, P. D., E. Thiakouli, and D. G. Themelis. 2009. Hybrid sequential injection-flow injection manifold for the spectrophotometric determination of total sulfite in wines using o-phthalaldehyde and gas-diffusion. Talanta 77 1614-1619. van Staden, J. F., M. G. Mashamba, and R. S. Stefan. 2002. An on-line potentiometric sequential injection titration process analyser for the determination of acetic acid. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 374 141-144. 

Part of the dissociated sulfite (largely in the form of bisulfite or HSO3 ) can bind reversibly or irreversibly to certain components of the food. This fraction is known as combined sulfite the fraction not bound to the food is called free sulfite and remains dissociated in dynamic equilibrium. The sum of the two fractions is called total sulfite. Thus, it is often important to measure both free and bound forms of sulfite that are present in foods. 

Various different extraction conditions (distillation, acid extractant, alkaline extractant, etc.) have been tried for determination of sulfites in foods and beverages. These processes require some procedure to remove and recover the total sulfites (free and reversibly bound) and avoid loss of sulfites during extraction, which can be substantial. This is especially important in complex food matrices where extraction is a crucial step in sulfite determination. 

Paino-Campa, G.,M. J. Penaegido,and C. Garcia-Moreno. 1991. Liquid-chromatographic determination of free and total sulfites in fresh sausages./. Sci. Food Agric. 56 85-93. 

Ruiz, E., M. I. Santillana, M. De Alba, M. T. Neeto, and S. Garcia-Castellanoa. 1994. High-performance ion chromatography determination of total sulfites in foodstuffs. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 17 447-456. 

Sullivan, J. J., T. A. Hollingworth, M. M. Wekell et al. 1990. Determination of total sulfite in shrimp, potatoes, dried pineapple, and white wine by flow-injection analysis—Collaborative study. /. AO AC 73 35-42. 

FIGURE 13.12 Distribution among sulfite species in aqueous solution as a function of pH. In this and similar plots, the vertical axis, labeled mol fraction is actually the fraction by mol of the total sulfite species, which is in each of the three forms shown. (From Kohl, A., and R. Nielsen. Gas Purification, ed. 5. Houston, TX Gulf, p. 508 (1997)). 

---