Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface conditions during dissolution

The 14 equations, sulfite rate of change in the liquid and the rates of sulfite transfer (in terms of r ) from the 13 sized particles, may be solved simultaneously for and the r s. Then the total sulfite concentration is calculated at each increment of time. In addition, to compute the proper surface conditions for the mass transfer driving force, all of the governing equations for the bulk listed in the section above on the surface conditions during dissolution must be solved at each time step. Two differences should be noted the solubility product for sulfate must now be satisfied and in the Ca2+ and sulfur balance, the effect of oxidation must be accounted for , ... [Pg.209]

Previous SECM dissolution measurements carried out on this systan showed that even on the fastest timescale accessible, the dissolution process was effectively diffusion controlled, even at a probe/crystal separation as close as 400nm, with a tip of a=2.5 pm [57]. This was not unexpected given that, under the experimental conditions, K+ levels in the gap between the SECM tip and the crystal surface increase during dissolution [54], ultimately suppressing the attainment of high undersaturations, and thereby holding the dissolution process in the mass transfer control regime. Thus, for the lE-AFM measurements, dissolution from the KBr surface was also uuder diffusion-controlled conditions. [Pg.440]

Different views exist as to the reasons for selective dissolution of the asperities. According to older concepts, convection of the liquid is hindered in the solution layers filling recesses hence, reaction products will accumulate there and raise the concentration and viscosity in these layers. Both factors tend to lower a metal s anodic dissolution rate relative to that at raised points. According to other concepts, a surface condition close to passive arises during electropolishing. In this case, the conditions for passivation of the metal at raised points differ from those in recesses. [Pg.315]

Because of the different potential distributions for different sets of conditions the apparent value of Tafel slope, about 60 mV, may have contributions from the various processes. The exact value may vary due to several factors which have different effects on the current-potential relationship 1) relative potential drops in the space charge layer and the Helmholtz layer 2) increase in surface area during the course of anodization due to formation of PS 3) change of the dissolution valence with potential 4) electron injection into the conduction band and 5) potential drops in the bulk semiconductor and electrolyte. [Pg.180]

Figure 7.3. (a) In situ X-ray reflectivity vs. time (measured at the anti-Bragg condition, shown in inset at top) during dissolution of orthoclase feldspar, KAlSi308, (001) cleavage surface at extreme pH values. The removal of successive monolayers (ML) is noted for each set of data, (after [100]) (b) in situ crystal truncation rod diffraction profiles for a freshly cleaved orthoclase (001) surface (circles) and after reaction at pH = 2.0 (1 and 15 ML dissolved) (diamond and square) and pH = 12.9 (2 ML dissolved) (triangle) (after [103]). (Figures provided by P. Fenter.)... [Pg.472]

Carbonate minerals are among the most chemically reactive common minerals under Earth surface conditions. Many important features of carbonate mineral behavior in sediments and during diagenesis are a result of their unique kinetics of dissolution and precipitation. Although the reaction kinetics of several carbonate minerals have been investigated, the vast majority of studies have focused on calcite and aragonite. Before examining data and models for calcium carbonate dissolution and precipitation reactions in aqueous solutions, a brief summary of the major concepts involved will be presented. Here we will not deal with the details of proposed reaction mechanisms and the associated complex rate equations. These have been examined in extensive review articles (e.g., Plummer et al., 1979 Morse, 1983) and where appropriate will be developed in later chapters. [Pg.72]

Single lattice vacancies that happen to be situated at a surface are, of course, small monomolecular pits. Therefore they may influence dissolution under some conditions. However they and the steps that they might produce are difficult to see, and the author is not aware of any attempts to study their effects. The same is true of isolated impurity atoms. On the other hand, clusters of lattice vacancies or impurity atoms can sometimes be detected quite readily (2). They produce small flat-bottomed etch pits during dissolution (Fig. 2) but the pits stop growing deeper as soon as the cluster has dissolved away. [Pg.138]

Hellmann R., Eggleston C. M., Hochella M. F., Jr. and Crerar D. A. (1990a) The formation of leached layers on albite surfaces during dissolution under hydrothermal conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 54, 1267—1281. [Pg.2367]

The first case is calcium sulfite dissolution without chemical reaction. Using a film model will allow the calculation of the surface concentrations of all the species and the rate of dissolution. With a knowledge of the particle population and solution concentrations, most of the variables are known when the experiment starts. To specify all the starting values of the variables, the conditions at the particle surface are required. From the consideration of saturation concentration In the previous section during dissolution, the bulk liquid must obey ... [Pg.202]

Surface and Bulk Conditions During Particle Dissolution with no Reaction... [Pg.206]

A somewhat alternative analysis of pitting attributes pit initiation to the activation of defects in the passive film, defects such as those induced during film growth or those induced mechanically due to scratching or stress. The pit behavior is analyzed in terms of the product, xi, a parameter in which x is the pit or crevice depth (cm), and i is the corrosion current density (A/cm2) at the bottom of the pit (Ref 21). Experimental measurements confirm that, for many metal/environment systems, the active corrosion current density in a pit is of the order of 1 A/cm2. Therefore, numerical values for xi may be visualized as a pit depth in centimeters. A defect becomes a pit if the pH in the pit becomes sufficiently low to prevent maintaining the protective oxide film. Establishing the critical pH, for a specific oxide, will depend on the depth (metal ions trapped by diffiisional constraints), the current density (rate of generation of metal ions) and the external pH. In turn, the current density will be determined by the local electrochemical potential established by corrosion currents to the passive external cathodic surface or by a potentiostat. Once the critical condition for dissolution of the oxide has been reached, the pit becomes deeper and develops a still lower pH by further hydrolysis. [Pg.288]

To demonstrate the systematics of how an oscillatory time variation in the reflectivity is possible during dissolution, we assume that the surface is characterized by occupation factors described by an error function profile (Fig. 28A). These occupation factors can be thought of as blocks of orthoclase, so that occupation factors <1 represent a partially filled layer that is locally stoichiometric. The position of the error function moves continuously as the surface dissolves. For simplicity, we first assume that the interface width does not change during dissolution. The reflectivity is calculated as a function of the error function position. At the anti-Bragg condition, neighboring terraces are out of phase. The phase factor for each layer, n, varies as ( <9 ) = (-1) , so that interfacial structure factor becomes ... [Pg.205]

A big amount of experimental studies of stability of many component systems Pt Me (where Me - transition metals Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, Ru) indicates about the formation of nanoclusters with core-shell structures [11-13], where mechanisms of the processes (including corrosive) with the formation of such structures are described. Firstly this is a surface segregation during the process of multicomponent nanocluster preparation [14], Due to such segregation nanocluster surface becomes enriched by one of the components, especially by platinum with the reduction of surface energy in segregated binary nanocluster [75]. In the process of corrosive influence (in model conditions or in tests of fuel cells) a prevailing dissolution of one component from basic metal Me and surface enrichment by platinum with the formation of a core-shell system. [Pg.199]


See other pages where Surface conditions during dissolution is mentioned: [Pg.202]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.797]    [Pg.2338]    [Pg.2356]    [Pg.4932]    [Pg.908]    [Pg.909]    [Pg.3181]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.914]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.204]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.202 , Pg.203 , Pg.204 ]




SEARCH



Dissolution surface conditions

© 2024 chempedia.info