Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Total coliforms

No more than 5.0% samples total coliform-positive in a month, (For water systems that collect fewer than 40 routine samples per month, no more than one sample can be total coliform-positive). Every sample that has total coliforms must be analyzed for fecal coliforms. There may not be any fecal coliforms or E. coli. Fecal coliform and E. coli are bacteria whose presence indicates that the water may be contaminated with human or animal wastes. Disease-causing microbes (pathogens) in these wastes can cause diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches, or other symptoms. These pathogens may pose a special health risk for infants, young children, and people with severely compromised immune systems. [Pg.25]

The UV dose required to reduce the survival fraction of total coliform and fecal streptococcus to 102 (99 percent removal) is approximately 4 x 10 ff Einsteins/ml. [Pg.455]

Coliform criteria for body-contact water use and recreational use have been established by most states. Upper limits of 200 fecal coliforms per 100 ml and 2,000 total coliforms per 100 ml have been established. These values are only... [Pg.460]

Van Poucke, S. O. Nelis, H. J. Rapid detection of fluorescent and chemiluminescent total coliforms and Escherichia coli on membrane filters. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2000,42,233-244. [Pg.18]

Fig. 5 Main contamination sources identified by PCA for sediments, fish, and suface water in the Ebro River basin, and explained variances for each principal component. Variable identification. Organic compounds in sediments 1, summatory of hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs) 2, summa-tory of DDTs (DDTs) 3, hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 4, hexachlorobutadiene (HCBu) 5, summatory of trichlorobenzenes (TCBs) 6, naphthalene 7, fluoranthene 8, benzo(a)pyrene 9, benzo(b) fluoranthene 10, benzo(g,h,i)perylene 11, benzo(k)fluoranthene 12, indene(l,2,3-cd)pyrene. Organic compounds in fish 1, hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 2, summatory of hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs) 3, o,p-DDD 4, o,p-DDE 5, o,p-DDT 6, p,p-DDD 7, />,/>DDE 8, />,/>DDT 9, summatory of DDTs (DDTs) 10, summatory of trichlorobenzenes (TCBs) 11, hexachlorobutadiene (HCBu) 12, fish length. Physico-chemical parameters in water 1, alkalinity 2, chlorides 3, cyanides 4, total coliforms 5, conductivity at 20°C 6, biological oxygen demand 7, chemical oxygen demand 8, fluorides 9, suspended matter 10, total ammonium 11, nitrates 12, dissolved oxygen 13, phosphates 14, sulfates 15, water temperature 16, air temperature... Fig. 5 Main contamination sources identified by PCA for sediments, fish, and suface water in the Ebro River basin, and explained variances for each principal component. Variable identification. Organic compounds in sediments 1, summatory of hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs) 2, summa-tory of DDTs (DDTs) 3, hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 4, hexachlorobutadiene (HCBu) 5, summatory of trichlorobenzenes (TCBs) 6, naphthalene 7, fluoranthene 8, benzo(a)pyrene 9, benzo(b) fluoranthene 10, benzo(g,h,i)perylene 11, benzo(k)fluoranthene 12, indene(l,2,3-cd)pyrene. Organic compounds in fish 1, hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 2, summatory of hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs) 3, o,p-DDD 4, o,p-DDE 5, o,p-DDT 6, p,p-DDD 7, />,/>DDE 8, />,/>DDT 9, summatory of DDTs (DDTs) 10, summatory of trichlorobenzenes (TCBs) 11, hexachlorobutadiene (HCBu) 12, fish length. Physico-chemical parameters in water 1, alkalinity 2, chlorides 3, cyanides 4, total coliforms 5, conductivity at 20°C 6, biological oxygen demand 7, chemical oxygen demand 8, fluorides 9, suspended matter 10, total ammonium 11, nitrates 12, dissolved oxygen 13, phosphates 14, sulfates 15, water temperature 16, air temperature...
T.A.M.=Total Aerobic Mesophilic bacteria T.A.T.=Total Aerobic Thermophilic bacteria T.An.M.=Total Anaerobic Mesophilic bacteria Coliforms=Total Coliform bacteria... [Pg.400]

R02024 Method 1604 Total Coliforms and Escherichia coli in Water by... [Pg.219]

Astrom et al. (2007) compared the total coliform and E. coli contamination of surface runoff and tile effluent from two no-till field plots one with surface-applied liquid dairy manure and a nonmanure-treated plot. These researchers found greater bacterial populations in surface and tile waters from the manure treated plot, but significant contamination occurred from the nonmanured plot attributed to bird and other wildlife feces. Soupir et al. (2006) examined the release and transport of bacteria from manure applied to pastureland. Using rainfall simulations, they... [Pg.177]

Coliforms total More than 5.0% samples total coliform-positive in a month Used to indicate presence of other harmful bacteria... [Pg.311]

No sample should contain more than 10 total coliform organisms per 100 mL. [Pg.724]

Sample Silver (ppm) Contact (min) Total Coliform (per ml) Cfii/100 ml... [Pg.16]

Pathogenic viruses, bacteria, protozoa and helminths may be present in raw municipal wastewater at the levels indicated in Table 11.3 and will survive in the environment for long periods. Pathogenic bacteria will be present in wastewater at much lower levels than that of the coliform group of bacteria, which are much easier to identify and enumerate (as total coliforms/100 ml). Escherichia coli are the most widely adopted indicator of faecal pollution and they can also be isolated and identified fairly simply, with their numbers usually being given in the form of faecal coliforms (FC)/100 ml of wastewater. [Pg.256]

The EPA Surface Water Treatment Ruse (SWTR) requires public water supplies, under the direct influence of surface water, to be disinfected. Some disinfectants produce chemical by-products SWTR requires that their concentration remain within the MCL. Currently, one such by-product is trihalomethanes. Water disinfection is effective when combined with conventional treatment, such as coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, and filtration. The latter is accomplished by sand or diatomaceous earth. The effectiveness of disinfection is evaluated by determining total coliform bacteria which are not pathogenic, but their presence suggests that certain pathogens may have survived. The various chemicals commonly used as disinfectants are presented below and some of their advantages and disadvantages are listed. [Pg.511]

Both microfiltration (02 m) and ultrafiltration (4 nm) alumina membranes are very effective in removing bacterias. For example, the bacteria level of a lagoon water is reduced from 1,000-5,000/cm to 0.03-0.4/cm and 0.03-0.1/cm with the microHltration and ultrafiltration membrane, respectively [Castelas et al., 1984]. The total coliform level drops from 50-500/cm to zero for both types of membranes. The accompanying permeate flux is 600-1,200 L/hr-m for 70 hours for the microfiltration membrane when the water contains a low level of colloids and only 200 L/hr-m for 20 hours when the concentrations of colloids and organic materials are high. The ultrafiltration flux varies between 100 and 250 L/hr-m for 1,000 hours of operation. [Pg.204]

Because the membrane acts as a filter, the final effluent (permeate) is generally of a very high quality in terms of turbidity, bacteria, solids, and colloidal material. Rejection of bacteria and viruses is significant with average log reductions of up to 8 for total coliforms [6]. [Pg.1008]

In the US EPA publication Small System Compliance Technology List for the Surface Water Treatment Rule (SWTR) and Total Coliform Rule (ICR) (September 1998), DE is a specifically approved filtration technology for compliance with the SWIR. In its comments the US EPA notes that DE is very effective for the removal of Giardia and Cryptosporidium" (23). [Pg.183]

US EPA, Small System Compliance Technology List for the Surface Water Treatment Rule and Total Coliform Rule, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1998. [Pg.190]

The Coliform Rule requires all public water systems to meet the coliform MCL and monitor total coliform with frequencies depending on population served, and requires small systems to conduct a sanitary survey. To comply with the coliform MCL, no more than 50% of all total coliform samples per month can be total coliform-positive. [Pg.369]

Total coliform (counts/100 mL) Fecal coUform (counts/100 mL)... [Pg.434]

Wagner (2006) and EPA Region 9 support the Volunteer Network for monitoring bacteria in San Francisco Bay area Creeks, with technical assistance, loans of field sampling equipment, and a limited number of laboratory analyses. Total Coliforms, E. coli, and Enterococcus sp. have been analysed (IDEXX methods) on sample collection from four creeks (San Pedro, Cerrito, Temescal and Mont Diablo) during wet and dry season. The results showed ... [Pg.34]

The microbiological quality of source water has been assessed through the use of indicator microorganisms. Until recently, total coliforms have been most often used to determine the level of treatment required for a source water. Treatment strategies recommended by the US Public Health Service for source water are shown in Table 4.2. [Pg.371]

The biological filter reduces the level of Salmonella paratyphi B84 by 99%, Mycobacterium tuberculosis by 66%, total coliforms by 85 to 99%, enteric virus by 40 to 60% and cysts of Entamoeba histolytica by 88 to 99%. [Pg.390]

While the MCLG for the microbial agents Giardia lamblia, Legionella, total coliform bacteria, viruses, and standard plate count has been set at zero, the MCL is based on the treatment technique. It is critical that no bacteria, viruses, or other microbial agents be found in the drinking water supply. [Pg.907]


See other pages where Total coliforms is mentioned: [Pg.7]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.96]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.347 ]




SEARCH



Coliforms

Total Coliform Rule

© 2024 chempedia.info