Titrant

Karl Fischer reagent A mixture ofU and SO2 dissolved in pyridine - MeOH used as a titrant for water with which HI is liberated and the pH determined with a meter. 

Equations for the principal methods for the redox determinations of the elements are given in Table 11.29. Volumetric factors in redox titrations for the common titrants are given in Table 11.28. 

Up to 5 mL solvent is usually added per titration. Near the end point the mixture is shaken vigorously after each addition of titrant, and the appearance or disappearance of the f color in the organic layer is observed. 

BackTitrations. In the performance of aback titration, a known, but excess quantity of EDTA or other chelon is added, the pH is now properly adjusted, and the excess of the chelon is titrated with a suitable standard metal salt solution. Back titration procedures are especially useful when the metal ion to be determined cannot be kept in solution under the titration conditions or where the reaction of the metal ion with the chelon occurs too slowly to permit a direct titration, as in the titration of chromium(III) with EDTA. Back titration procedures sometimes permit a metal ion to be determined by the use of a metal indicator that is blocked by that ion in a direct titration. Eor example, nickel, cobalt, or aluminum form such stable complexes with Eriochrome Black T that the direct titration would fail. However, if an excess of EDTA is added before the indicator, no blocking occurs in the back titration with a magnesium or zinc salt solution. These metal ion titrants are chosen because they form EDTA complexes of relatively low stability, thereby avoiding the possible titration of EDTA bound by the sample metal ion. 

The accuracy of a standardization depends on the quality of the reagents and glassware used to prepare standards. For example, in an acid-base titration, the amount of analyte is related to the absolute amount of titrant used in the analysis by the stoichiometry of the chemical reaction between the analyte and the titrant. The amount of titrant used is the product of the signal (which is the volume of titrant) and the titrant s concentration. Thus, the accuracy of a titrimetric analysis can be no better than the accuracy to which the titrant s concentration is known. 

The point in a titration where stoichiometrically equivalent amounts of analyte and titrant react. 

For a titration to be accurate we must add a stoichiometrically equivalent amount of titrant to a solution containing the analyte. We call this stoichiometric mixture the equivalence point. Unlike precipitation gravimetry, where the precipitant is added in excess, determining the exact volume of titrant needed to reach the equivalence point is essential. The product of the equivalence point volume, Veq> and the titrant s concentration, Cq, gives the moles of titrant reacting with the analyte. 

Almost any chemical reaction can serve as a titrimetric method provided that three conditions are met. The first condition is that all reactions involving the titrant and analyte must be of known stoichiometry. If this is not the case, then the moles of titrant used in reaching the end point cannot tell us how much analyte is in our sample. Second, the titration reaction must occur rapidly. If we add titrant at a rate that is faster than the reaction s rate, then the end point will exceed the equivalence point by a significant amount. Finally, a suitable method must be available for determining the end point with an acceptable level of accuracy. These are significant limitations and, for this reason, several titration strategies are commonly used. 

A simple example of a titration is an analysis for Ag+ using thiocyanate, SCN , as a titrant. 

Instead of measuring the titrant s volume we also can measure its mass. Since the titrant s density is a measure of its mass per unit volume, the mass of titrant and volume of titrant are proportional. 

This reaction occurs quickly and is of known stoichiometry. A titrant of SCN is easily prepared using KSCN. To indicate the titration s end point we add a small amount of Fe + to the solution containing the analyte. The formation of the red-colored Fe(SCN) + complex signals the end point. This is an example of a direct titration since the titrant reacts with the analyte. 

A graph showing the progress of a titration as a function of the volume of titrant added. 

The titration curve in Figure 9.1 is not unique to an acid-base titration. Any titration curve that follows the change in concentration of a species in the titration reaction (plotted logarithmically) as a function of the volume of titrant has the same general sigmoidal shape. Several additional examples are shown in Figure 9.2. 

Concentration is not the only property that may be used to construct a titration curve. Other parameters, such as temperature or the absorbance of light, may be used if they show a significant change in value at the equivalence point. Many titration reactions, for example, are exothermic. As the titrant and analyte react, the temperature of the system steadily increases. Once the titration is complete, further additions of titrant do not produce as exothermic a response, and the change in temperature levels off. A typical titration curve of temperature versus volume of titrant is shown in Figure 9.3. The titration curve contains two linear segments, the intersection of which marks the equivalence point. 

Table 9.1), with the choice of buret determined by the demands of the analysis. The accuracy obtainable with a buret can be improved by calibrating it over several intermediate ranges of volumes using the same method described in Chapter 5 for calibrating pipets. In this manner, the volume of titrant delivered can be corrected for any variations in the buret s internal diameter. 

Titrations may be automated using a pump to deliver the titrant at a constant flow rate, and a solenoid valve to control the flow (Figure 9.5). The volume of titrant delivered is determined by multiplying the flow rate by the elapsed time. Automated titrations offer the additional advantage of using a microcomputer for data storage and analysis. 

A titration in which the reaction between the analyte and titrant is an acid—base reaction. 

The utility of acid-base titrimetry improved when NaOH was first introduced as a strong base titrant in 1846. In addition, progress in synthesizing organic dyes led to the development of many new indicators. Phenolphthalein was first synthesized by Bayer in 1871 and used as a visual indicator for acid-base titrations in 1877. Other indicators, such as methyl orange, soon followed. Despite the increasing availability of indicators, the absence of a theory of acid-base reactivity made selecting a proper indicator difficult. 

In the overview to this chapter we noted that the experimentally determined end point should coincide with the titration s equivalence point. For an acid-base titration, the equivalence point is characterized by a pH level that is a function of the acid-base strengths and concentrations of the analyte and titrant. The pH at the end point, however, may or may not correspond to the pH at the equivalence point. To understand the relationship between end points and equivalence points we must know how the pH changes during a titration. In this section we will learn how to construct titration curves for several important types of acid-base titrations. Our... 

Finally, for volumes of NaOH greater than the equivalence point volume, the pH is determined by the concentration of excess OH-. For example, after adding 30.0 mb of titrant the concentration of OH- is... 

Figure 9.8b shows a titration curve for a mixture consisting of two weak acids HA and HB. Again, there are two equivalence points. In this case, however, the equivalence points do not require the same volume of titrant because the concentration of HA is greater than that for HB. Since HA is the stronger of the two weak acids, it reacts first thus, the pH before the first equivalence point is controlled by the HA/A buffer. Between the two equivalence points the pH reflects the titration of HB and is determined by the HB/B buffer. Finally, after the second equivalence point, the excess strong base titrant is responsible for the pH. 

Earlier we made an important distinction between an end point and an equivalence point. The difference between these two terms is important and deserves repeating. The equivalence point occurs when stoichiometrically equal amounts of analyte and titrant react. For example, if the analyte is a triprotic weak acid, a titration with NaOH will have three equivalence points corresponding to the addition of one, two, and three moles of OH for each mole of the weak acid. An equivalence point, therefore, is a theoretical not an experimental value. 

The principal limitation to using a titration curve to locate the equivalence point is that an inflection point must be present. Sometimes, however, an inflection point may be missing or difficult to detect, figure 9.9, for example, demonstrates the influence of the acid dissociation constant, iQ, on the titration curve for a weak acid with a strong base titrant. The inflection point is visible, even if barely so, for acid dissociation constants larger than 10 , but is missing when is 10 k... 

---