Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Definition detection thresholds

Multiple alignments of repeats are constructed in an iterative manner. The initial alignment is based on definitions from determined protein structures or else from the literature. In the initial database search step, a profile constructed from the multiple alignment is compared with a sequence database. Top scoring sequences are considered using complementary approaches such as PSI-BLAST and FASTA to provide the two thresholds minimum E value and minimum number of repeats per protein required. After one or two iterations, the final alignment and the thresholds are stored in the SMART database to allow the detection of repeats in any sequence. [Pg.212]

If reasonable amounts of negative quarks could be had in a sample, energetic photons just above the threshold can ionize the quark to a free state with moderate kinetic energy. One advantage of such an experiment liberating photo-ionized quarks is that a high-resolution spectrometer (or related multi-channel device) can detect the well-defined X-rays emitted by the capture of the quark to a definite heavy atom (such as gold or thorium). [Pg.36]

The odour threshold may be lower than the limit of analytical detection (e.g. sulphur compounds, pyrazines). In such cases authenticity assessment is definitely impossible. [Pg.383]

Performance is defined by the sensitivity threshold, or the minimum concentration of element in solution that will yield an analytical signal with amplitude equal to twice that of the average background signal. This classical definition leads to optimistic values that can vary from element to element. The limit of detection represents the concentration of an element that can be detected with a 95% confidence limit (cf. chapter 21). In general, measurements are made in a concentration domain that corresponds to 50 times the limit of detection. [Pg.282]

ODOR. An important property of many substances, manifested by a physiological sensation caused by contact of their molecules with the olfactory nervous system. Odor and flavor are closely related, and both are profoundly affected by submicrogram amounts of volatile compounds. Attempts to correlate odor with chemical structure have produced no definitive results, Objective measurement techniques involving chromatography are under development. Even potent odors must be present in a concentration of 1,7 x I07 molecules/cc to be detected. It has been authentically stated that the nose is 100 times as sensitive in detection of threshold odor values as the best analytical apparatus. [Pg.1135]

The peak-valley ratios vary from zero for separations where no valley can be detected, to unity for complete separation. It ought to be noticed that a P value equal to zero does not necessarily imply that two solutes elute with exactly the same retention time (or k value). There is a threshold separation below which the presence of two individual bands in one peak only leads to peak broadening or deformation, without the occurrence of a valley. In these cases Rs values are indeed not equal to zero, because by definition (eqn.1.14) Rs is proportional to the difference in retention times. [Pg.121]

The sensory evaluation differentiates between the stimulation threshold (a just detectable level where a perceptible but not yet definable deviation of the sample from the standard is observed) and the recognition threshold, a level where the odor is identifiable or creates odor problems (a no longer tolerable quality deterioration caused by a definite off odor and/or taste). The difference between a perceptible and identifiable level is usually only one to two steps of a geometric dilution series. Therefore, only undifferentiated odor and taste thresholds are given in Table 13-6, because of the very different sensitivities of individual testers. The perceptible (stimulation) levels of a less sensitive tester can overlap with the identifiable (recognition) level of another more sensitive tester. [Pg.422]

Some of the examples and discussion in this chapter draw on the two-class classification problem, which here is hit versus inactive . The word active refers to a validated hit, that is, a molecule that truly does exhibit some level of the desired biological response. A key point is that an assay is itself an estimator. With this in mind, definitions and a discussion of error rates are given in the context of predictive models. Borrowing from the terminology of signal detection, the sensitivity of a model refers to the fraction of observed hits that are classified as (or predicted to be) hits by the model, and specificity refers to the fraction of observed inactives classified as inactives by the model. An observed hit is not necessarily an active molecule, but simply a molecule for which the primary screening result exceeded a decision threshold. Whether such a molecule turns out to be an active is a problem that involves the sensitivity of the assay, but the task at hand is for... [Pg.90]

The threshold of sensitivity varies according to the instrument and the element being considered. Numerous comparative tables on detection limit values exist which are continually being updated as a result of the progress made in instrumentation. The sensitivity threshold corresponds to the minimum concentration of element in solution that will yield an analytical signal for which the amplitude is equal to three times the standard deviation calculated for an analytical blank. This classic definition leads to rather optimistic values and very variable with respect to the element. The detection limit of the instrument represents the concentration of an element, which allows detection with a confidence of 95 per cent (cf. Chapter 22). [Pg.321]


See other pages where Definition detection thresholds is mentioned: [Pg.1368]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.3104]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.2212]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.266]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.226 ]




SEARCH



Detection odor threshold, definition

Detection thresholds

© 2024 chempedia.info