Proteins Three Dimensional

The secondary stmcture elements are then identified, and finally, the three-dimensional protein stmcture is obtained from the measured interproton distances and torsion angle parameters. This procedure requites a minimum of two days of nmr instmment time per sample, because two pulse delays are requited in the 3-D experiment. In addition, approximately 20 hours of computing time, using a supercomputer, is necessary for the calculations. Nevertheless, protein stmcture can be assigned using 3-D nmr and a resolution of 0.2 nanometers is achievable. The largest protein characterized by nmr at this writing contained 43 amino acid units (51). However, attempts ate underway to characterize the stmcture of interleukin 2 [85898-30-2] which has over 150 amino acid units. 

This electron microscopy reconstruction has since been extended to high resolution (3 A) where the connections between the helices and the bound retinal molecule are visible together with the seven helices (Figure 12.3c). The helices are tilted by about 20° with respect to the plane of the membrane. This is the first example of a high-resolution three-dimensional protein structure determination using electron microscopy. The structure has subsequently been confirmed by x-ray crystallographic studies to 2 A resolution. 

A beta barrel is a three-dimensional protein fold motif in which beta strands connected by loops form a barrellike structure. For example, this fold motif is found in many proteins of the immunoglobulin family and of the chymotrypsin family of serine proteases. 

Development of methodologies for protein self-assembly into a predesigned three-dimensional protein lattice carries potential for the construction of protein scaffolds, offering potential applications such as platforms for the ordered positioning of other proteins via protein fusion or of organic molecules by specific binding. 

Antigen-presenting cells recognize complex three-dimensional protein molecules of at least 1000 daltons (Da) in size. Most drugs are much smaller than this and cannot be recognized on their own. Only proteins such as insulin or exogenous sera are identified and their peptides presented directly to T cells. 

The two subsidiaries consider here are deCODE Biostructures and deCODE Chemistry. deCODE Biostructures provides solutions to its clients in gene synthesis, determination of three-dimensional protein-ligand structures, and pre-formulation screening... 

Sinz A. Chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry to map three-dimensional protein structures and protein-protein interactions. Mass. Spectrom. Rev. 25 663-682. 

Dihazi, G.H., and Sinz, A. (2003) Mapping low-resolution three-dimensional protein structures using chemical cross-linking and Fourier transform ion-cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom. 17, 2005-2014. 

Determination of three-dimensional protein structures has become an important tool in protein research, indicated by the exponentially growing number of protein data bank entries during the last decade. They have contributed considerably to our understanding of function and mechanism of biomolecules. Structures of proteins alone or in complex with their substrates or binding partners like cofactors, DNA, or other proteins can visualize interactions at the atom-... 

Antigen antibody recognition is dependent on protein structure. A conformational change in a protein caused by formalin fixation may mask the epitope and thus affect the antigenicity of proteins in formalin-treated tissue (Montero 2003). The antigen retrieval leads to a renaturation or at least partial restoration of the protein structure, with re-establishment of the three-dimensional protein structure to something approaching its native condition (Shi et al. 1991). 

It has been recognized that many of the time-consuming interactive tasks carried out by an expert during the process of spectral analysis could be done more efficiently by automated computational systems [6]. Over the past few years, this potential has been realized to some degree. Today automated methods for NMR structure determination are playing a more and more prominent role and can be expected to largely supersede the conventional manual approaches to solving three-dimensional protein structures in solution. 

Disulfide bridges are, of course, true covalent bonds (between the sulfurs of two cysteine side chains) and are thus considered part of the primary structure of a protein by most definitions. Experimentally they also belong there, since they can be determined as part of, or an extension of, an amino acid sequence determination. However, proteins normally can fold up correctly without or before disulfide formation, and those SS links appear to influence the structure more in the manner of secondary-structural elements, by providing local specificity and stabilization. Therefore, it seems appropriate to consider them here along with the other basic elements making up three-dimensional protein structure. 

Aside from the direct techniques of X-ray or electron diffraction, the major possible routes to knowledge of three-dimensional protein structure are prediction from the amino acid sequence and analysis of spectroscopic measurements such as circular dichroism, laser Raman spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance. With the large data base now available of known three-dimensional protein structures, all of these approaches are making considerable progress, and it seems possible that within a few years some combination of noncrystallo-graphic techniques may be capable of correctly determining new protein structures. Because the problem is inherently quite difficult, it will undoubtedly be essential to make the best possible use of all hints available from the known structures. 

Here too we have an example of the rate at which scientific information is created currently. The earliest three-dimensional protein structures were products of decades of work. In the succeeding four decades, we have defined three-dimensional stractures for more than 5000 proteins and complexes of proteins with small molecules. They occupy huge publicly available databases. They grow daily. This information is of great importance for several purposes. Among these is the design of novel molecules useful in human clinical medicine. 

The elegant models of three-dimensional protein structures, such as those shown in figure 11.3, fail in one respect they provide a sense of a static molecule in space. As we learned from very simple structures such as ethane, molecules are dynamic, changing conformations in space rapidly. This is surely true for proteins as well... 

Now we can ask what is likely to happen to the three-dimensional structure of a protein if we make a conservative replacement of one amino acid for another in the primary structnre. A conservative replacement involves, for example, substitution of one nonpolar amino acid for another, or replacement of one charged amino acid for another. Intnitively, one would expect that conservative replacements would have rather little effect on three-dimensional protein structure. If an isoleucine is replaced by a valine or leucine, the structnral modification is modest. The side chains of all of these amino acids are hydrophobic and will be content to sit in the molecnlar interior. This expectation is borne out in practice. We have noted earlier that there are many different molecnles of cytochrome c in nature, all of which serve the same basic function and all of which have similar three-dimensional structnres. We have also noted the species specificity of insulins among mammalian species. Here too we find a number of conservative changes in the primary structure of the hormone. Although there are exceptions, as a general rule conservative changes in the primary structnre of proteins are consistent with maintenance of the three-dimensional structures of proteins and the associated biological functions. 

We encountered the properties of hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules in our thoughts about driving forces for formation of three-dimensional protein structures. Specifically, proteins fold in a way that puts most of the hydrophobic amino acid side chains into the molecular interior, where they can enjoy each other s company and avoid the dreaded aqueous environment. At the same time, they fold to get the hydrophilic amino acid side chains onto the molecular surface, where they happily interact with that enviromnent. The same ideas are important for the double-stranded helical structure of DNA. The hydrophobic bases are localized within the double hehx, where they interact with each other, and the strongly hydrophilic sugar and phosphate groups are exposed on the exterior of the double helix to the water environment. Now, we need to understand something more about structural features that control these properties. 

---