Theoretical chemistry quantum mechanics

Although we have not yet described the modem methods of dealing with theoretical chemistry (quantum mechanics), it is possible to describe many of the properties of atoms. For example, the energy necessary to remove an electron from a hydrogen atom (the ionization energy or ionization potential) is the energy that is equivalent to the series limit of the Lyman series. Therefore, atomic spectroscopy is one way to determine ionization potentials for atoms. 

H. Primas, Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics, and Reductionism, Perspectives in Theoretical Chemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983. 

Primas H (1981) Chemistry, quantum mechanics and reductionism perspectives in theoretical chemistry, vol 24. Lecture Notes in Chemistry, Springer Verlag, Berlin... 

Mathematics chemistry physics ecology systems biology engineering theoretical physics theoretical biology quantum mechanics fluid mechanics astronomy sociology psychology behavioral science. 

Chemisoq)tion bonding to metal and metal oxide surfaces has been treated extensively by quantum-mechanical methods. Somoijai and Bent [153] give a general discussion of the surface chemical bond, and some specific theoretical treatments are found in Refs. 154-157 see also a review by Hoffman [158]. One approach uses the variation method (see physical chemistry textbooks) ... 

It was reahzed quite some decades ago that the amount of information accumulated by chemists can, in the long run, be made accessible to the scientific community only in electronic form in other words, it has to be stored in databases. This new field, which deals with the storage, the manipulation, and the processing of chemical information, was emerging without a proper name. In most cases, the scientists active in the field said they were working in "Chemical Information . However, as this term did not make a distinction between librarianship and the development of computer methods, some scientists said they were working in "Computer Chemistry to stress the importance they attributed to the use of the computer for processing chemical information. However, the latter term could easily be confused with Computational Chemistry, which is perceived by others to be more limited to theoretical quantum mechanical calculations. 

With better hardware and software, more exact methods can be used for the representation of chemical structures and reactions. More and more quantum mechanical calculations can be utilized for chemoinformatics tasks. The representation of chemical structures will have to correspond more and more to our insight into theoretical chemistry, chemical bonding, and energetics. On the other hand, chemoinformatics methods should be used in theoretical chemistry. Why do we not yet have databases storing the results of quantum mechanical calculations. We are certain that the analysis of the results of quantum mechanical calculations by chemoinformatics methods could vastly increase our chemical insight and knowledge. 

There is a lot of confusion over the meaning of the terms theoretical chemistry, computational chemistry and molecular modelling. Indeed, many practitioners use all three labels to describe aspects of their research, as the occasion demands "Theoretical chemistry is often considered synonymous with quantum mechanics, whereas computational chemistry encompasses not only quantum mechanics but also molecular mechaiucs, minimisation, simulations, conformational analysis and other computer-based methods for understanding and predicting the behaviour of molecular systems. Molecular modellers use all of these methods and so we shall not concern ourselves with semantics but rather shall consider any theoretical or computational tecluiique that provides insight into the behaviour of molecular systems to be an example of molecular modelling. If a distinction has to be... 

In applying quantum mechanics to real chemical problems, one is usually faced with a Schrodinger differential equation for which, to date, no one has found an analytical solution. This is equally true for electronic and nuclear-motion problems. It has therefore proven essential to develop and efficiently implement mathematical methods which can provide approximate solutions to such eigenvalue equations. Two methods are widely used in this context- the variational method and perturbation theory. These tools, whose use permeates virtually all areas of theoretical chemistry, are briefly outlined here, and the details of perturbation theory are amplified in Appendix D. 

Quantum mechanics, in contrast, is a theoretical subject relating to many aspects of chemistry and physics, but particularly to spectroscopy. 

Chapter 1, Computational Models and Model Chemistries, provides an overview of the computational chemistry field and where electronic structure theory fits within it. It also discusses the general theoretical methods and procedures employed in electronic structure calculations (a more detailed treatment of the underlying quantum mechanical theory is given in Appendix A). 

The modern approach to chemical education appears to be strongly biased toward theories, particularly quantum mechanics. Many authors have remarked that classical chemistry and its invaluable predictive rules have been downgraded since chemistry was put into orbit around physics. School and undergraduate courses as well as textbooks show an increasing tendency to begin with the establishment of theoretical concepts such as orbitals and hybridization. There is a continuing debate in the chemical literature on the relative merits of theory as opposed to qualitative or descriptive chemistry 1-6). To quote the late J. J. Zucker-man who supported the latter approach (3). 

It should also be acknowledged that in recent years computational quantum chemistry has achieved a number of predictions that have since been experimentelly confirmed (45-47). On the other hand, since numerous anomalies remain even within attempts to explain the properties of atoms in terms of quantum mechanics, the field of molecular quantum mechanics can hardly be regarded as resting on a firm foundation (48). Also, as many authors have pointed out, the vast majority of ab initio research judges its methods merely by comparison with experimental date and does not seek to establish internal criteria to predict error bounds theoretically (49-51). The message to chemical education must, therefore, be not to emphasize the power of quantum mechanics in chemistry and not to imply that it necessarily holds the final answers to difficult chemical questions (52). 

The problems which the orbital approximation raises in chemical education have been discussed elsewhere by the author (Scerri [1989], [1991]). Briefly, chemistry textbooks often fail to stress the approximate nature of atomic orbitals and imply that the solution to all difficult chemical problems ultimately lies in quantum mechanics. There has been an increassing tendency for chemical education to be biased towards theories, particularly quantum mechanics. Textbooks show a growing tendency to begin with the establishment of theoretical concepts such as atomic orbitals. Only recently has a reaction begun to take place, with a call for more qualitatively based courses and texts (Zuckermann [1986]). A careful consideration of the orbital model would therefore have consequences for chemical education and would clarify the status of various approximate theories purporting to be based on quantum mechanics. 

The use of quantum mechanics, or more specifically, orbitals and electronic configurations in teaching general chemistry is now such a widespread trend that it would be utterly futile to try to reverse it. Moreover, orbitals and configurations have been extremely useful in providing a theoretical framework for the unification of a multitude of chemical facts. 

A Brief Review of the QSAR Technique. Most of the 2D QSAR methods employ graph theoretic indices to characterize molecular structures, which have been extensively studied by Radic, Kier, and Hall [see 23]. Although these structural indices represent different aspects of the molecular structures, their physicochemical meaning is unclear. The successful applications of these topological indices combined with MLR analysis have been summarized recently. Similarly, the ADAPT system employs topological indices as well as other structural parameters (e.g., steric and quantum mechanical parameters) coupled with MLR method for QSAR analysis [24]. It has been extensively applied to QSAR/QSPR studies in analytical chemistry, toxicity analysis, and other biological activity prediction. On the other hand, parameters derived from various experiments through chemometric methods have also been used in the study of peptide QSAR, where partial least-squares (PLS) analysis has been employed [25]. 

Kinetics on the level of individual molecules is often referred to as reaction dynamics. Subtle details are taken into account, such as the effect of the orientation of molecules in a collision that may result in a reaction, and the distribution of energy over a molecule s various degrees of freedom. This is the fundamental level of study needed if we want to link reactivity to quantum mechanics, which is really what rules the game at this fundamental level. This is the domain of molecular beam experiments, laser spectroscopy, ah initio theoretical chemistry and transition state theory. It is at this level that we can learn what determines whether a chemical reaction is feasible. 

In my opinion, the last qualitative change in theoretical chemistry corresponds to the introduction of computers in chemistry. A conventional date for the beginning of this last period may be indicated in the Boulder Conference of 1959 [2], i.e. more than thirty years ago. The use of more and more large and efficient computers has shifted the attention of theoretical chemists to an extensive use of quantum mechanical calculations. 

Quantum mechanics was the dominant theory in chemistry even before the advent of electronic computers. The conventional date for the beginning of this period may be fixed at 1927 with the publications of the Heitler and London paper on hydrogen molecule [3]. The growth of theoretical chemistry (or better, theoretical quantum chemistry) between 1930 and 1960 (thirty years, again, as for the last period) has followed a research programme different from that accepted in the most recent period. 

I think that the majority of my colleagues will agree with this statement Coulson s worries are not become a reality, theoretical chemistry has survived to the impact with computerized quantum mechanics and has grown in a complex discipline, rich of different facets, and with an increasing weight in chemistry. 

Despite the availability of fast computers and efficient codes for accurate quantum chemistry calculations, it is not likely in the near future that we will be able to study chemical reactions in proteins taking all the proteins atoms into quantum mechanical calculations. Hybrid methods in which different parts of large molecular systems are treated by different theoretical levels of methods are likely to play a key role in such studies for the coming decade or more. The ONIOM method we have developed is a versatile hybrid method that allows combining different quantum mechanical methods as well as molecular mechanics method in multiple layers, some features of... 

---