The smooth interface

We have a mixture of ions of density pi, charge e and diameter tr. /)j(z)is the number density profile of i at a distance z from the electrode, which is always assumed to be flat and perfectly smooth. The singlet distribution function is 

This equation can be integrated to obtain the alternate relation between the charge and potential profiles 

The total potential drop N4s is obtained from Eq.(1.46) by either letting = 0 or z CX3, depending on the reference potential of the model. In general the latter choice is adopted. An important quantity is the differential capacitance Cj which defined by 

Consider the Poisson equation Eq.(1.45). If we approximate the density of the ions by Boltzmann distribution formula [62, 63] 

A first integral of this differential equation can be obtained multiplying both sides by 74 z]. For the planar electrode this yields 

---

The reflectivity R is oi oi oi he complex conjugate of roi hence for the smooth interface the Fresnel reflectivity is given by... 

The it "zero neutral stability boundary predicted by Equation 33.2 has been denoted as ZNS lines while the stability boundary predicted by Equation 33.1 has been denoted by ZNS. The interplay between the stability of the smooth interface and the flow regime transition in the upper phase is elucidated with reference to Figure 7, which represents air-water flow in various conduit sizes. 

Consider Figure 7a for relatively large diameter tube, D = 9.5cm. For demonstration, maintaining the liquid flow rate at = 0.4cm/s, while increasing the gas rate, the latter becomes turbulent at point 1 (Re > 2,100). However Equation 33.1 is not yet fulfilled, and, therefore, at point 1, the smooth interface is still stable with turbulent flow in the upper phase. With further increase of the air flow rate. Equation 33.1 is met at point T , which represents a transitional point from stratified-smooth to stratified-wavy. The locus of all transitional points as obtained by Equation 33.1 (represented by the solid line) constitutes the predicted stratified-smooth boundary. Note that Equation 33.2 as represented by a dashed line is irrelevant in this case since it assumes laminar conditions. 

We start with the simplest model of the interface, which consists of a smooth charged hard wall near a ionic solution that is represented by a collection of charged hard spheres, all embedded in a continuum of dielectric constant c. This system is fairly well understood when the density and coupling parameters are low. Then we replace the continuum solvent by a molecular model of the solvent. The simplest of these is the hard sphere with a point dipole[32], which can be treated analytically in some simple cases. More elaborate models of the solvent introduce complications in the numerical discussions. A recently proposed model of ionic solutions uses a solvent model with tetrahedrally coordinated sticky sites. This model is still analytically solvable. More realistic models of the solvent, typically water, can be studied by computer simulations, which however is very difficult for charged interfaces. The full quantum mechanical treatment of the metal surface does not seem feasible at present. The jellium model is a simple alternative for the discussion of the thermodynamic and also kinetic properties of the smooth interface [33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. 

In the sticky sites model (SSM), the excess properties of the interface depend only on the correlation functions of the smooth interface. Introducing the potentials of mean force tJ (Ri, Rj,R )... 

On short length scales the coarse-grained description breaks down, because the fluctuations which build up the (smooth) intrinsic profile and the fluctuations of the local interface position are strongly coupled and camiot be distinguished. The effective interface Flamiltonian can describe the properties only on length scales large compared with the width w of the intrinsic profile. The absolute value of the cut-off is difficult... 

Figure 3.28 shows 3D-SIMS distributions of the elements Si, Al,Ti, and Cr. The Cr distribution is shown from the bottom, to illustrate the rough interface. It is apparent that the interfaces are not smooth. This is the reason for the slowly decreasing Cr signal in the depth profile. As is apparent in the 3D-distribution, the different depth profiles of Si,Ti, and A1 in the layer are a result of respective particulate inclusions. 

The above discussion has tacitly assumed that it is only molecular interactions which lead to adhesion, and these have been assumed to occur across relatively smooth interfaces between materials in intimate contact. As described in typical textbooks, however, there are a number of disparate mechanisms that may be responsible for adhesion [9-11,32]. The list includes (1) the adsorption mechanism (2) the diffusion mechanism (3) the mechanical interlocking mechanism and (4) the electrostatic mechanism. These are pictured schematically in Fig. 6 and described briefly below, because the various semi-empirical prediction schemes apply differently depending on which mechanisms are relevant in a given case. Any given real case often entails a combination of mechanisms. 

A high modulus gradient at the interface is also be avoided in materials Joined as a result of the interdiffusion of materials to form a fractal surface [32]. The effect is to produce an interfacial composite region. This strengthens the interface and leads to a more gradual change in modulus and avoids the sharp concentrations of stress which would occur at a smooth interface. 

The simulated free surface of liquid water is relatively stable for several nanoseconds [68-72] because of the strong hydrogen bonds formed by liquid water. The density decrease near the interface is smooth it is possible to describe it by a hyperbolic tangent function [70]. The width of the interface, measured by the distance between the positions where the density equals 90% and 10% of the bulk density, is about 5 A at room temperature [70,71]. The left side of Fig. 3 shows a typical density profile of the free interface for the TIP4P water model [73]. 

The SEM pictures were shown in Fig. 3 were scale layers stripped flnm different sections of quartz rod. Fig. 3(a) was a cross sectional profile of scale from the severe scaled point. Level (1) was quartz rod substrate scale tightly appressed to level (1) was named level (2). It could be seen from Fig. 3(a) that there was no obvious interface between the scale and quartz substrate. The positive face of this scale block was shown in Fig. 3(b) and the scale stripped from the smooth scaled point was shown in Fig. 3(c). Compared with Fig. 3(b), there were less agglomerations and shorter whisker columns in Fig. 3(c). The XRD patterns were shown... 

In conclusion, ET is a polyfunctional cytokine that affects monocytes as well as vascular smooth muscle cells, anterior pituitary cells, and renal mesangial cells. In the biologic interface between ischemic or injured endothelium and monocytes, neutrophils, or lymphocytes, ET may play a significant role. 

Annular flow, smooth interface (Henry et al., 1969) Since the interface is relatively small compared to dispersed flow and assumed to be smooth, there is no significant momentum transfer or mass transfer between phases. Under such conditions, the change of slip ratio with pressure is... 

The study of metal ion/metal(s) interfaces has been limited because of the excessive adsorption of the reactants and impurities at the electrode surface and due to the inseparability of the faradaic and nonfaradaic impedances. For obtaining reproducible results with solid electrodes, the important factors to be considered are the fabrication, the smoothness of the surface (by polishing), and the pretreatment of the electrodes, the treatment of the solution with activated charcoal, the use of an inert atmosphere, and the constancy of the equilibrium potential for the duration of the experiment. It is appropriate to deal with some of these details from a practical point of view. 

---