The Optimization of Separations

Up to this point, we have looked only at the separation of two-component mixtures. The optimization of separation becomes more complicated for samples that contain many components of widely different k values. 

The Window diagram method for the optimization of separation was developed by Laub and Purnell [73], and it has been used both for gas chromatography and HPLC. Recently it is applied in TLC and HPTLC [19,74—76]. 

Prus and Kowalska [75] dealt with the optimization of separation quality in adsorption TLC with binary mobile phases of alcohol and hydrocarbons. They used the window diagrams to show the relationships between separation selectivity a and the mobile phase eomposition (volume fraction Xj of 2-propanol) that were caleulated on the basis of equations derived using Soezewiriski and Kowalska approaehes for three solute pairs. At the same time, they eompared the efficiency of the three different approaehes for the optimization of separation selectivity in reversed-phase TLC systems, using RP-2 stationary phase and methanol and water as the binary mobile phase. The window diagrams were performed presenting plots of a vs. volume fraetion Xj derived from the retention models of Snyder, Schoen-makers, and Kowalska [76]. 

The qualitative analysis of retention behaviour in liquid chromatography has now become possible. Quantitative retention-prediction is, however, still difficult the prediction of retention time and the optimization of separation conditions based on physicochemical properties have not yet been completely successful. One reason is the lack of an ideal stationary phase material. The stationary phase material has to be stable as part of an instrument, and this is very difficult to achieve in normal-phase liquid chromatography because the moisture in organic solvents ages the silica gel. 

Subsequently four different CE modes are described in the sections Capillary Zone Electrophoresis, Capillary Gel Electrophoresis, Capillary Isoelectric Focussing, and Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography (MEKC), respectively. The fundamental principles of the specific separation modes are briefly explained, using appropriate equations where required. In Table 3 all equations are listed. In addition, the influence of both instrumental parameters and electrolytic solution parameters on the optimization of separations is described. 

The build instrument stage in figure 7.1 implies that a system should be assembled that contains the appropriate column and detector. For the optimization of separations with (capillary) GC we may also have to decide upon the type of injector to be used. However, at this stage only a workable system (one in which all relevant components can be injected and detected) and not an optimized system has to be assembled or built . 

Additional details on the comparison of the steady-state and transient methods, and on the optimization of separation speed as well as resolution, can be found in the original publication [50]. 

Two examples of the optimization of separation factor values for enantiomers are presented in Figures 2... 

As a last resort it is possible to apply neural networks (NN). NN can in principle model surfaces with any complexity. However, the number of experiments required is laige. This, together with the fact that NN is a rather specialised technique, explains that the number of applications in the literature is limited. Examples are to be found in 70-72). In the latter application two variables (pH and modifier content) are investigated for four chlorophenols and the authors found that when 15 to 20 experiments are carried out, better results are obtained with a multi-layer feed-forward NN than when using quadratic or third-order models. Although we believe that for the optimization of separations, NN will prove practical only in few cases, it seems useful to explain the first principles of the methodology here. A simple network is shown in Fig. 6.25. 

One considerable disadvantage of coated polysaccharide type CSPs, however, is the high solubility of the SO in many organic solvents, e.g. chloroform, ethylacetate, and tetrahydrofuran, restricting the choice of mobile phases that can be used. Accordingly, inflexibility in the optimization of separations and enantioselectivity is a considerable drawback this counts in particular for preparative separations, where often the solubility of the SAs in the mobile phase is limited and thus loadability and finally the productivity rate is reduced. 

The optimization of separations performed with IIC and the rationalization of analytes retention behavior are not easy tasks because they are influenced by many interdependent factors. This allows a fine modulation of their effects to achieve tailor-made separations. 

Chemometries has played two major roles in MEKC for analysis of the data collected from the separation and detection of analytes, and for efficient optimization of the separation conditions. Regarding data analysis, chemometrics can allow deconvolution of poorly resolved peaks (15,16) and quantification of the corresponding analytes. Chemometrics can also be employed for multivariate calibration (17), characterization of complex samples, and to study peak purity. Sentellas and Saurina have recently reviewed the role of chemometrics applied to data analysis in CE (18). For MEKC in particular, chemometrics has been used more widely as a tool for optimization of separation conditions. The focus of this chapter is to exemplify the utility of chemometric methods for the optimization of separation conditions in MEKC. 

One of the current trends in separation science is the development of comprehensive or multidimensional separation systems, in which CE and CE-MS are also achieving relative importance. Chemometric approaches like the ones described in this chapter will surely be of great help for the optimization of these more complicated separation systems. Current trends toward miniaturization in separation science are also well known. Ultrafast separations, extremely low sample requirements, and automation of the arrangement are some of these goals. Chemometrics will surely provide an interesting and challenging approach for the optimization of separation conditions in these miniaturized systems, including microchips for years to come. 

Fig. 12.22 Scheme of integral automated system for the optimization of separation processes in HPLC showing the essential (solid lines) and subsidiary (dashed lines) communication links. (Reproduced from [56] with permission of John Wiley Sons). 

An optimum separation is one which gives adequate sample resolution with a minimum of time and effort. This requires the optimization of separation selectivity, bed efficiency (i.e., bed plate number N), and the capacity factor (i.e., In this chapter we will examine the... 

A column-switching valve offers a valuable aid to the optimization of separations. The dead volume of such a switching valve has to be small, to avoid a significant additional peak broadening. 

Figvire 4. Flow-chart for the optimization of separation conditions in reversed-phase LC. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 9. Copyright 1984, Elsevier. 

An excellent paper by Sanz-Nebot et al. [1303] focuses on the optimization of separations for therapeutic peptide hormones (e.g., lypressin, oxytocin, bradykinin, triptorelin, buserelin, bovine insulin, salmon calcitonin, met-enkephalin and leu-enkephalin), The optimal mobile phase for a 25°C Cjg column was 35/65/0.1 acetonitrile/water/TFA. The effects of changing solution pH and percent acetonitrile on both k and resolution were plotted. The final separation took 28 min with all analytes but calcitonin eluting prior to 8 min. 

Rozylo, J., and Janicka, M. (1991b). Thermodynamic description of liquid-solid chromatography process in the optimization of separation conditions of organic compound mixture. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 14 3197-3212. 

Enantioselective HPLC has evolved in recent years to a routine method carried out on analytical, preparative, and industrial scale. The optimization of separations... 

ChromSword supports the optimization of separation for polynomial models up to a power of six. Thus, the most complex retention-concentration effects can be described and the separation optimized. AU polynomial models predict the retention of solutes rather precisely in the interpolation region of those concentrations studied. These models are less reliable in the extrapolation region. For example, if experiments were performed with 40% and 50% of organic solvent in a mobile phase, one can expect rather good prediction of retention and separation in the region between these concentrahons and less accuracy in the regions of 30-35% and 50-55%. Extrapolahon to wider hmits very often leads to substantial deviations between predicted and experimental data. 

A preliminary (basic) design of the VBER-300 has been completed in 2002. At present, the design is undergoing an expertise in the Rosatom of the Russian Federation. The phase that included the optimization of separate design features and schemes is near completion, and the development of the detailed design is underway. A land based nuclear cogeneration plant with the VBER-300 could be deployed in 2013, and a floating NPP with two VBER-300 reactors could be deployed in 2012. 

---