Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The marker method

Relatively small fractionating volumes are associated with HDC systems. Therefore, the Rf market method (27) typically is used to compensate for possible variations in the operating parameters during the separation. Figure 13 shows a HDC calibration plot that was obtained by the marker method. The arbitrary log sol diameter versus Rf plot produced a linear relationship for this series of 40-600-nm SdFFF-characterized sols as standards. With this particular HDC system, silica sols can be routinely measured with precisions of about 15% (relative) with the peak-position calibration method. This precision level is a direct result of the relatively poor resolution of HDC separations. [Pg.294]

An interesting data is one that presents information about the direction of layer formation of the sohd formed. It can be noted, indeed, that a layer of solid B, which grows thicker on the surface of another sohd A, can grow either by inward development (the new sohd gets inserted in the initial sohd) or by outward development (the new sohd grows onto the surface of the iriihal sohd). Two direct experimental methods exist that examine the direchon of layer development the marker method and the cavity method. [Pg.16]

It has been shown using the marker method that the scale like that on pure molybdenum grows by the inward diffusion of sulfur and consequently... [Pg.623]

Analytical results of distilled spidts are expressed either by chemical class or by individual constituent. When these results are expressed by chemical class, the most prevalent constituent within that class is used as the marker, eg, acetic acid for acids, acetaldehyde for aldehydes, and ethyl acetate for esters. Wet chemical methods are employed in the deterrnination of results by chemical class, while more advanced and refined techniques are employed in the deterrnination of individual chemical constituents. [Pg.88]

Short (2-6 bp), inherited, tandem repeat units of DNA occur about 50,000-100,000 times in the human genome (Chapter 36). Because they occur more frequently—and in view of the routine application of sensitive PCR methods—they are replacing RFLPs as the marker loci for various genome searches. [Pg.411]

The final chapter (Chapter 16) shows how PLC can be used to isolate and identify unknown terpenoic compounds from the frankincense resin (olibanum) and to find marker diterpenes. The novel development at low temperamres is included in the PLC methods described. [Pg.9]

NADA methods should be capable of reliably measuring an analyte (i.e., the marker residue) that has a defined quantifative relationship to the total residues of toxicological concern in the tissues of interest, namely the target tissue and muscle. The target tissue is generally the last tissue in which total residues deplete to the permitted maximum safe concentration. When the marker residue is at the tolerance, a defined unique concentration, the total residues have depleted to the respectively established safe concentrations in the target tissue and muscle. [Pg.79]

The final difference is that the FDA analyst alone makes the recommendation based on the data for the acceptance of the confirmatory procedure. The conclusion of the analyst stating the suitability of the procedure for confirming the presence of the marker residue is sent directly to the CVM method trial coordinator in the Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation (ONADE) and not back to the sponsor as with the determinative procedure. [Pg.92]

For confirmatory methods, the confirmatory procedure criteria described previously should be met. All negative control samples should fail to meet the confirmation standard established in the procedure. All samples fortified at or above the tolerance and all incurred residue samples at or above the tolerance should meet the confirmation standard (to confirm) described in the SOP. It has been argued that it is not necessary for incurred samples containing the marker residue at a concentration below the tolerance to meet established confirmatory criteria. However, failure to confirm the marker residue in these samples may indicate a lack of robusmess of the procedure. Any procedure that had this problem would be closely examined to ensure that the method would meet the needs of the Agency. [Pg.93]

However, there is no general requirement that enforcement methods need to monitor all metabolites of an active ingredient. The primary purpose of enforcement methods is to detect violations of good agricultural practice. For this purpose, residue levels found in samples from the market (so-called Market Basket Surveys) have to be compared with MRLs, which are derived from residue concentrations found in supervised trials. It is not necessary for this comparison to be based on the total pesticide residue. Most often the choice of a single compound (e.g., parent or primary metabolite) as a marker of the total pesticide residue is more feasible. Method development and the later method application are much easier in that case. Only for intake calculation purposes, e.g., when the daily intake of pesticide residues (calculated from the results... [Pg.97]

The most critical decision to be made is the choice of the best solvent to facilitate extraction of the drug residue while minimizing interference. A review of available solubility, logP, and pK /pKb data for the marker residue can become an important first step in the selection of the best extraction solvents to try. A selected list of solvents from the literature methods include individual solvents (n-hexane, " dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, acetone, acetonitrile, methanol, and water ) mixtures of solvents (dichloromethane-methanol-acetic acid, isooctane-ethyl acetate, methanol-water, and acetonitrile-water ), and aqueous buffer solutions (phosphate and sodium sulfate ). Hexane is a very nonpolar solvent and could be chosen as an extraction solvent if the analyte is also very nonpolar. For example, Serrano et al used n-hexane to extract the very nonpolar polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from fat, liver, and kidney of whale. One advantage of using n-hexane as an extraction solvent for fat tissue is that the fat itself will be completely dissolved, but this will necessitate an additional cleanup step to remove the substantial fat matrix. The choice of chlorinated hydrocarbons such as methylene chloride, chloroform, and carbon tetrachloride should be avoided owing to safety and environmental concerns with these solvents. Diethyl ether and ethyl acetate are other relatively nonpolar solvents that are appropriate for extraction of nonpolar analytes. Diethyl ether or ethyl acetate may also be combined with hexane (or other hydrocarbon solvent) to create an extraction solvent that has a polarity intermediate between the two solvents. For example, Gerhardt et a/. used a combination of isooctane and ethyl acetate for the extraction of several ionophores from various animal tissues. [Pg.305]

Another subset of SPE is immunoaffinity extraction, in which an antibody specific to the analyte is incorporated into the SPE sorbent. This technique is very selective to the analyte and would be very effective in separating the marker residue from tissue-related matrix components. Disadvantages of immunoaffinity extraction are the need to develop a specific antibody-based SPE for each analyte. This approach holds promise for the future as the development of antibody-based methods becomes more commonplace. [Pg.309]

Specificity is a measure of how selectively the analytical method measures the marker compound in the presence of other compounds. The descriptors used to establish specificity differ depending upon the guideline (see Table 3), but the purpose behind them is the same. In all cases, the method must be demonstrated to have no interference from several (at least five) confrol animals that represent variation in sex, age, and breed. Further, incurred residue samples or authentic metabolite standards must demonstrate no interference with the marker residue detection. The method must be tested with other approved dmgs for the target species to show that no interference exists if these compounds are also present. [Pg.319]

DNA construct will often contain an effect gene and a selectable marker gene (such as antibiotic or herbicide resistance), both of which are bracketed by promoter and terminator sequences. A plasmid vector carries this cassette of genetic information into the plant genome by one of the above methods. [Pg.655]

Radiotracer techniques involving lsO in the anodization process are used with subsequent neutron activation analysis84 or SIMS.85 Another method involves implantation of inert ion markers into the surface layer of the sample prior to anodization and examination of the position of the markers after the oxide film has grown to a certain thickness.86 Assuming immobility of the inert species, the ratio of the cation to the anion transport number, t+/, should be equal to the ratio of the outer to the inner layer thickness. Numerous experimental determinations72,87 suggest t+ and f to be 0.4 and 0.6, respectively. [Pg.428]

Many statistical methods have been developed for association studies [52, 53] that mostly consist of testing each polymorphism separately with the disease. It has been shown that the power of such methods decreases rapidly when the markers are in low or even moderate LD with the risk-conferring polymorphism [54]. One way to overcome this defect is to use haplotype-based tests [47, 55, 56] that combine different alleles of different markers. Haplotypes are likely to capture... [Pg.68]

Marking crayons and inks/paints are some of the oldest methods of applying identification to slabs of rubber whilst being stored prior to incorporation into products or during factory operations. Care must be taken to ensure that the materials used for such identification are compatible with the rubbers on which they are being used. Coloured markers can also contain pigments which may contain active metal ions which could conceivably cause activation of oxidative degradation of the rubber if used extensively. [Pg.193]


See other pages where The marker method is mentioned: [Pg.47]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.826]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.784]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.255]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info