The flux calculation

Having solved for the concentration profile(s), how do we obtain the current flowing This reduces, of course, to obtaining each species concentration gradient G at X 0. We could simply use a two-point approximation and let it be, for example. 

---

In Illustrative Example 19.2 we discussed the flux of trichloroethene (TCE) from a contaminated aquifer through the unsaturated zone into the atmosphere. The example was based on a real case of a polluted aquifer in New Jersey (Smith et al., 1996). These authors compared the diffusive fluxes, calculated from measured TCE vapor concentration gradients, with total fluxes measured with a vertical flux chamber. They found that the measured fluxes were often several orders of magnitude larger than the fluxes calculated from Fick s first law. In these situations the vapor profiles across the unsaturated zone were not always linear. The authors attributed this to the influence of advective transport through the unsaturated zone. In order to test this hypothesis you are asked to make the following checks ... 

In DMS flux calculations it is assumed that DMS in air is negligible compared to that in seawater and therefore the concentration difference used in the flux calculation is essentially equal to DMS concentration in seawater. Figure 10 depicts variations in surface DMS flux in the coastal and open ocean areas of the Indian Ocean. The DMS fluxes from the coastal waters of India are lower than that from the open Ocean. Higher DMS fluxes in the central Indian Ocean are associated with higher DMS abundance and high wind speeds in winter of 1999. In the coastal areas the DMS flux varied between 0.04 pmol m-2 d 1 and... 

The computation of the fluxes from either of Eqs. 8.3.24 necessarily involves an iterative procedure (except for the special cases discussed above), partly because the themselves are needed for the evaluation of the matrix of correction factors and also because an explicit relation for the matrix [0] cannot be derived as a generalization of Eq. 8.2.16 for binary mass transfer there is no requirement in matrix algebra for the matrices [FFq] be equal to each other even though the fluxes calculated from both parts of these equations must be equal. Indeed, these two matrices will be equal only in the case of vanishingly small mole fraction differences (yg Tg) and vanishingly small mass transfer rates. In almost all cases of interest these two matrices are quite different. An explicit solution was possible for binary systems only because all matrices reduce to scalar quantities. 

Run 7 of the simulations of Modine s experiments is particularly sensitive to the mass transfer model used. This experiment was used as the basis for the flux calculation in Example 10.4.1. For this experiment none of the models does well at predicting the total amount of acetone transfer. The Krishna-Standart method, the linearized theory and the effective diffusivity model predict the wrong direction of mass transfer while the experimental data show that there is net vaporization of acetone, the models predict net condensation. This erroneous prediction comes about in part because of the extremely small magnitude of the acetone flux relative to the total flux. 

Repeat Example 8.3.1 (equimolar diffusion in a ternary system) using an effective diffusivity method for determining the fluxes and composition profiles. Compare the fluxes calculated with the effective diffusivity model to those obtained in Example... 

The two latter equalities in eq.(9.115) tell us that the fluxes calculated in the fluid film and at the outer surface of the particle should be equal. 

So far we have assumed that x has no bound state components or they have been projected out from x if any. This is actually not necessary as long as the distance R, is chosen to be large enough such that the bound state components of x vanish for R > R,. The flux calculation can be carried out without the need to project out bound state components from x-... 

Figure 6 compares the experimentally measured metabolite profiles resulting from the oxidation of a pulse of [ C]-indene by steady state chemostat cells with the kinetic profiles predicted by Eqs. (7)-(12) using flux values independently determined for the same steady state. The excellent agreement between the actual tracer data and the predicted oxidation profiles provides an additional validation of the fluxes calculated for the KYI network. 

We have dealt with Knudsen flow in a straight capillary and in a converging/diverging pore, and we see that the shape of a pore can contribute to the flux calculation. Now we turn to dealing with practical solids where pore orientation is rather random. 

Calculate the permeate flow rate of this module at an inlet pressure of 1.5 bar and calculate the pressure drop (For the flux calculation the gel layer model may be... 

Since the above-core calculations represented an infinite array of fuel channels, they did not include those parts of the pressure vessel in the vicinity of the hot gas duct penetration and therefore no account was taken in the above-core calculation of the neutrons wMch scatter around the top comer of the graphite stack and enter the hot gas duct penetration area. The neutron fluxes in the vicinity of the hot duct entrances were therefore takai to be equal to the fluxes calculated for the side shield model with a contribution added to account for the top-core leakage component. This component was scaled fi om the sub-core results and is considered to probably result in pessimistically high flux values for the hot gas duct pen ration since the neutron flux levels below the core are generally higher than those above. 

Eq. 4.41 could be used here (see below for the flux calculations) but here the situation is simpler the corresponding current equation... 

The two latter equalities in Equation 5.48 imply that the fluxes calculated in the fluid film and at the outer surface of the particle should be equal. If the reaction proceeds everywhere in the particle with the same velocity, r/ (c ), the molar flow at the surface of the particle would be... 

The flux calculated at the top of the tube is quite small, but must be that small to allow the temperature to drop from the measured convection section feed/steam preheat exchanger outlet temperature to the upper most measured catalyst temperature. The small flux is insufficient to supply all the net endothermic heat of reaction, so the temperature drops several degrees. Further down the tube the flux is sufficient to supply the reaction plus sensible heat, and the temperature rises. The flux profile is sensitive to the specified catalyst temperatures. Small discrepancies in the catalyst temperatures (or their position) require that the flux profile change significantly, if all the model and measured temperatures are required to match. Reconciliation of the measured temperatures, with shape constraints (rate of change or inflection point restrictions) on the flux profile can be used to assure a reasonable flux profile. 

More recently it has been suggested that if the isotopic flux of water appears to be smaller than the flux calculated from a volume-change measurement, this is due to the existence of a poorly stirred layer of water on either side of the cellular membrane. A stagnant layer obviously does not disturb appreciably the results obtained when measuring an osmotic flow but has a profound influence on the tracer results. 

The thermal insulation was treated as air in the flux calculations Concrete 86.92 vol%, Reinforcing bars 13.08 vol%... 

In Table 28.3 are listed the constants of each detector mate rial needed for the flux calculations. The thermal activation cross... 

Calculations based on energy. The above analysis is all based on current transfer to the surface. However, another analysis approach has been to use the energy of the substrate in the flux calculation. Energy calculations are most useful when trying to determine the efficiency of the system for energy recovery. However, they do imply assumptions that cannot be met in an MFC, as shown in the example below. 

---