The Electrified Interphase

1 Assume that an isolated preparation of cytosolic organelles has been obtained and is sitting in a test tube on your bench. Describe and discuss two methods for precipitating these organelles based on their colloidal nature. Discuss when one method might be preferred over the other. 

2 Describe a molecular model for the organization of water molecules around a cell. Include in your analysis the orientation, structure, dimensions, and composition of the region. 

3 Is tire Stern or Grahame model of the interphase to be preferred over the Gouy - Chapman or Helmholtz model in biological systems  

4 In experiments to investigate the protein structure of the nucleosome octamer, the isolated nucleosome is placed in a very high ionic strength solution. This step causes the dissociation of the DNA from the histones. Explain this in terms of the interactional energies of nucleosome formation. 

5 The voltage change across the plasma membrane in a firing neuron is -80 mV - - -1-50 mV. 

---

The ILs interact with surfaces and electrodes [23-25], and many more studies have been done that what we can cite. As one example, in situ Fourier-transform infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (FT-IRAS) has been utilized to study the molecular structure of the electrified interphase between a l-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate [C2Qlm][BF4] liquid and gold substrates [26]. Similar results have been obtained by surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) for [C4Cilm][PFg] adsorbed on silver [24,27] and quartz [28]. 

For sodium dodecanesulfonate, a classical IPR for positively charged analytes, the potential determining ion is dodecanesulfonate, while the counter ion is the sodium cation. The electrified interphase will carry a barely negative charge since... 

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is extensively employed for the investigation of SAMs because the broad range of frequencies covered by this technique (usually from 10 to 10 Hz) may allow processes with different relaxation times taking place within the electrified interphase to be detected and sorted out. Unfortunately, the various relaxation times often differ by less than 2 orders of magnitude, thus requiring a certain amount of arbitrariness and of physical intuition for their separation. In fact, it is well known that the same impedance spectrum can often be equally well fitted to different equivalent circuits, which are consequently ascribed to different relaxation processes. Impedance spectra are frequently reported on a Y /co versus Y"/co plot, where Y and Y" are the in-phase and quadrature components of the electrochemical admittance and co is the angular frequency. This plot is particularly suitable for representing a series RC network. Thus, a series connection of R and C yields... 

These, then, are some of the ultimate goals of double-layer research. They may be summarized thus From a knowledge of the bulk phases, to determine the structure of the electrified interface and finally the potential variation across the interphase region. 

The clearest introduction to the electrochemical potential (hat is given by its creator, in Chap. 8ofIv. A. Guggenheim, Thermodynamics, North-1 lollaiul, Amsterdam, 1967. [ lie issue of electric potentials near interfaces is discussed in detail in K. Faisons, Fquilihrium properties of electrified interphases. Modern Aspects Etectrochem. 1 103 (1954). 

Interphases containing free charged components, which are usually accumulated or depleted in the surface regions, are called electrified interphases. When charged components are present in the two phases, electroneu-... 

This means that a heterogeneous catalytic system where an electrified interphase is formed cannot be unambiguously treated ignoring the electrochemical parameters. 

The Role of Electrosorption (Adsorption Processes). - The adsorbed species play a central role in catalytic and electrocatalytic transformations. The knowledge of the adsorption behavior of the various species present in a given system and the clarification of their competitive adsorption processes present a fundamental requirement for the interpretation of the kinetic data and for the elaboration of appropriate synthetic methods. In the case of electrified interphases, these requirements cannot be met if we neglect the monitoring of the electrode potential. 

The state of any electrified interphase depends on the potential. It is well known from the electrochemistry that the adsorption, electrosorption processes of ions and neutral molecules are strongly influenced by the potential of the electrode. 

In the historical development of the concept of electrified interphase, the modeling preceded the strict thermodynamic description and thus for a long period, only the double-layer model served as a unique... 

During the first haF of the last century, both the theoretical and experimental work in coimection with electrified interphases were mainly centered around the mercury-water system. 

The rigoroiis analysis of the effect of temperature variations on interfacial properties is a key tool to provide new and valuable information on the structure and reactivity of the metal solution interphase. The entropy of the components that form the interphase is a unique probe of their stmctural properties. Therefore, this experimental data is particularly useful for the validation of molecular models of electrified interphases. In addition, the use of fast temperature perturbations is especially suitable for the selective characterization of different inter-facial components, based on their different response time towards the temperature change. In this way, the entropic properties of doublelayer phenomena and charge-transfer adsorption processes can be evaluated separately. It will be shown in this chapter that the combina-... 

Considering the low intensity of the electric field imposed to the sample as well as the peak-characteristics, we believe this oriented entity be the electrified interface between the dispersed water and the continuous oily phase. For the above reasons the peak recorded at T = - 20°C was labeled the interphase peak (16). 

The system of distinctions and terminology of the thermodynamic and electric potentials introduced by Lange is still very useful and recommended for describing all electrified phases and interphases. Therefore these potentials can be assigned to metal/solution (M/s), as well as the liquid/liquid boundaries created at the interfaces of two immiscible electrolyte solutions water (w) and an organic solvent (s). 

Every liquid interface is usually electrified by ion separation, dipole orientation, or both (Section II). It is convenient to distinguish two groups of immiscible liquid-liquid interfaces water-polar solvent, such as nitrobenzene and 1,2-dichloroethane, and water-nonpolar solvent, e.g., octane or decane interfaces. For the second group it is impossible to investigate the interphase electrochemical equilibria and the Galvani potentials, whereas it is normal practice for the first group (Section III). On the other hand, these systems are very important as parts of the voltaic cells. They make it possible to measure the surface potential differences and the adsorption potentials (Section IV). 

There is a functional relationship between the charge on each phase (or the potential difference across the interface) and the structure of the interphase region. The fundamental problem of double-layer studies is to unravel this functional relationship. One has understood a particular electrified interface if, on the basis of a model (i.e., an assumed type of arrangement of the particles in the interphase), one can predict the distribution of charge (or variation of potential) across the interphase. 

It is clear that the adsorption of species in the metal-solution interphase region needs a subtle analysis. The unraveling of the complex situation and the building up of a basic picture of the accumulation and depletion of species at an electrified interface is one of the principal achievements of the new electrochemistry and is largely due to the American electrochemist, Grahame. 

At the instant of immersion of the electrode in the electrolyte (i.e., at time t = 0), the graph for some species i, say, the positive ions M+, would show that the concentration was independent of x and equal to the bulk concentration c9 (Fig. 6.47). This is because at / = 0, the double layer has not yet been formed, i.e., the interface has not yet become electrified. For t > 0, the anisotropic forces at the boundary begin to operate, and the separation and sorting out of the various charges in the interphase take place. 

What next One must seek knowledge of the distribution of particles in the interphase region—the structure. One must also seek the variation of potential with distance and the interatomic forces that make up the interphasial structure. One seeks to develop the atomic theory of the interface. To achieve these tasks, one must learn to intuit models, for these are the crutches that can aid one in acquiring an atomic view of an electrified interface. A preview of these models will be presented in the next sections. 

The thermodynamic description of an electrified solid-liquid interphase is similar to that of nonionic systems with one important difference—the description requires the introduction of electrochemical parameters the thermodynamic charge and the electrical potential difference between the solid phase considered and a reference electrode. 

This two-step profile of the potential across the interphase is also characteristic for certain types of modified electrodes in which the metal surface is coated with a film, whose thickness significantly exceeds the atomic scale. Such systems represent a much more complicated type of electrified interfaces, since the distribution of charged species depends crucially on the specific properties of the film. In most cases of sufficiently thick films, the profile of the Galvani potential across the interphase possesses a plateau inside the bulk film separating two potential drops at its interfaces with the electrode and the solution [16]. 

Figure 4.3 The concept of an interphase to describe the surface properties between two electrified phases, a-phase and jS-phase.

---