The Distribution of Standard Free Energy

The standard free energy can be divided up in two ways to explain the mechanism of retention. First, the portions of free energy can be allotted to specific types of molecular interaction that can occur between the solute molecules and the two phases. This approach will be considered later after the subject of molecular interactions has been discussed. The second requires that the molecule is divided into different parts and each part allotted a portion of the standard free energy. With this approach, the contributions made by different parts of the solvent molecule to retention can often be explained. This concept was suggested by Martin [4] many years ago, and can be used to relate molecular structure to solute retention. Initially, it is necessary to choose a molecular group that would be fairly ubiquitous and that could be used as the first building block to develop the correlation. The methylene group (CH2) is the 

---

The Distribution of Standard Free Energy Between Different Types of Molecular Interactions... 

The Plate Theory shows that retention volume of a solute is directly proportional to its distribution coefficient between the two phases. Classical thermodynamics provides an expression that relates the equilibrium constant which, in the case of chromatographic retention, will be the distribution coefficient to the change in standard free energy of the solute, when transferring from one phase to the other. 

Simulations on the effect of step free energy on grain growth behaviour have also been made. Figure 15.11 shows the result of a Monte Carlo simulation made by Cho. For the simulation, Cho assumed that the grain network was a set of grains with a Gaussian size distribution (standard deviation of 0.1) located on vertices of a two-dimensional square lattice. Deterministic rate equations, Eq. (15.15) for v/> and Eq. (15.29) for v j, were... 

FIGURE 3 19 Distribution of two products at equilibrium at 25 C as a function of the standard free energy difference (AG ) between them... 

The distribution coefficient is an equilibrium constant and, therefore, is subject to the usual thermodynamic treatment of equilibrium systems. By expressing the distribution coefficient in terms of the standard free energy of solute exchange between the phases, the nature of the distribution can be understood and the influence of temperature on the coefficient revealed. However, the distribution of a solute between two phases can also be considered at the molecular level. It is clear that if a solute is distributed more extensively in one phase than the other, then the interactive forces that occur between the solute molecules and the molecules of that phase will be greater than the complementary forces between the solute molecules and those of the other phase. Thus, distribution can be considered to be as a result of differential molecular forces and the magnitude and nature of those intermolecular forces will determine the magnitude of the respective distribution coefficients. Both these explanations of solute distribution will be considered in this chapter, but the classical thermodynamic explanation of distribution will be treated first. 

Different portions of the standard free energy of distribution can he allotted to different parts of a molecule and, thus, their contribution to solute retention can be disclosed. In addition, from the relative values of the standard enthalpy and standard entropy of each portion or group, the nianner in which the different groups interact with the stationary phase may also be revealed. 

In contrast to apportioning the standard free energy between different groups in the solute molecule, the standard free energy can also be dispensed between the different types of forces involved in the solute/phase-phase distribution. This approach has been elegantly developed by Martire et al. [13]. In a simplified form, the standard free energy can be divided into portions that result from the different types of interaction, e.g.,... 

If one introduces an overpotential into a distribution law such as that given by Morrison, one obtains for the current density of a cathodic reaction at an overpotential, TJ, in a reaction the standard free energy of which AG°,... 

Chromatography and thermodynamics. Thermodynamic relationships can be applied to the distribution equilibria defined in chromatography. /C(= Cs/Cm), the equilibrium constant defining the concentration C of analyte in the mobile phase (M) and stationary phase (S) can be determined from chromatographic experiments. If the temperature of the experiment is known, it is possible to determine the variation of the standard free energy AG° for this transformation ... 

In these cases, the standard free energy of adsorption can be obtained from the equilibrium condition and is a simple exponential function of the potential which does not depend significantly on the charge distribution at the interface for an uncharged adsorbate. The chemisorption thus corresponds to a vertical shift in the free energy curves as depicted in Fig. 12 and affects the energy of activation [76]. 

In this last equation AF0,lntisthe standard free energy of reaction AF°f in the prevailing medium, corrected for the translational free energy loss when the oriented center, in which the electron formerly resided, disappears during the formation of product from the centered distribution on the hypersurface. This corrected AF° constitutes the driving force for reaction at the mean separation distance R ... 

We have used the phase distribution data shown in Figures 1-4 to calculate the standard free energies of the ion exchange reaction using a simplified version of the equation of Gaines and Thomas (12). 

The values of the CMC or CMT collected as a function of temperature or concentration can be used to extract the enthalpic and entropic contributions to the association process. For a closed association mechanism with relatively large aggregation number and a narrow distribution, the standard free energy and standard enthalpy of micelle formaMi nd AH°, per mole of the solute in the micelle) are related to the CMC and its temperature dependence in the form (Lindman and V fennerstrom, 1980 Zhou and Chu, 1994). 

Recent studies showed that amphiphilic properties have to be taken into account for most water-soluble monomer units when their behavior in water solutions is considered. The amphiphilic properties of monomer units lead to an anisotropic shape of the polymer structures formed under appropriate conditions, which is confirmed both by computer simulation and experimental investigations. The concept of amphiphilicity applied to the monomer units leads to a new classification based on the interfacial and partitioning properties of the monomers. The classification in question opens a broad prospective for predicting properties of polymer systems with developed interfaces (i.e., micelles, polymer globules, fine dispersions of polymer aggregates). The relation between the standard free energy of adsorption and partition makes it possible to estimate semiquantitatively the distribution between the bulk and the interface of monomers and monomer units in complex polymer systems. 

---