The Breakthrough Experiments

As mentioned in Section 5.2.1, the two-photon absorption phenomenon was theoretically predicted in 1932 by M. Goppert-Mayer [19] but was demonstrated experimentally only 30 years later thanks to the development of laser sources. Interestingly, the first observation of two-photon absorption induced fluorescence phenomenon was reported in 1961 by 

---

Table 2 Molecular dimensions (nm) of the solvent and probe molecules used for the breakthrough experiments.

Cu(NH3)2BTC2/3 and finally copper hydroxide in the presence of water. The formation of the BTC salts was supported by the collapse of the structure after interaction of ammonia with unsaturated copper centers. The release of BTC and copper oxide centers provides sites for reactive adsorption of ammonia during the course of the breakthrough experiments. Interestingly, even though the structure collapses, some evidence of the structural breathing of the resulting materials caused by reactions with ammonia was found, based on the ammonia adsorption at equilibrium and the analysis of the heat of interactions [51]. 

Another feature of the breakthrough method is that the uniform geometry of the packed column permits fairly straightforward analysis of the thermal waves produced due to heats of adsorption, and of their effect on the shape of the sorption fronts. The most obvious advantage of this method, however, is the fact that the results of the breakthrough experiments can be applied rather directly to the design of commercial adsorbers, with relatively little analysis of the data. 

Pure component loadings for CO2, N2 and O2 on commercial pelleted forms of Linde type 4A, 5A and 13X molecular sieve zeolites were derived from various gravimetric and volumetric measurements. The range of pressures and temperatures over which these measurements were made were at least as broad as those encountered in the breakthrough experiments described here, to permit accurate estimations of heats of adsorption in the manner described by equation (6) above. As mentioned above, the pure component data were correlated to the LRC model, and the CO2 loadings predicted by the multicomponent LRC model compared to actual loadings in the breakthrough runs at bed saturation. 

Tert-butylbenzene (BDH Chemicals Ltd Poole, England) and cyclohexane (POCH, Poland) were used as probe organic compounds in the breakthrough experiments. 

Comparing the log-scaled TBB breakthrough plots vs time for mixed M and separated S beds of activated carbon and molecular sieve without or with water vapour, it can be affirmed that separated activated carbon/molecular sieve bed ( S ) is more effective than mixed ( M ). In the case of cyclohexane breakthrough a negative effect caused by mixing of activated carbon with molecular sieve is observed. This effect is probably caused by the different linear flow rates for TBB and CHX on the breakthrough experiments. 

Breakthrough Experiments. For the breakthrough experiments the sorbents were packed in 100-mg beds, 4 mm in diameter, and inserted into the six ports in the manifold. The effluent ends of the tubes were connected to a common line leading to the flame ionization detector. While the flame ionization detector, calibrated with the challenge atmosphere, monitored the concentration of vinyl acetate in the combined bed effluents, the pump in the detector drew the challenge atmosphere through each bed at approximately 0.2 L/min. The output from the detector, the breakthrough curve, was recorded with a strip-chart recorder. Most of the porous polymer sorbents tested were first washed with acetone and dried. 

Example 8.8 A wastewater containing 25 mg/L of phenol and having the characteristic breakthrough of the previous example is to be treated by adsorption onto an activated carbon bed. The flow rate during the breakthrough experiment is 0.11 mVs this is equivalent to a surficial velocity of 0.0088 m/s. The XIM ratio of the bed for the desired effluent of 0.06 mg/L is 0.02 kg solute per kg carbon. If the flow rate for design is also 0.11 mVs, design the absorption column. Assume the influent is introduced at the top of the bed. The packed density of the carbon bed is 721.58 kg/ml... 

As mentioned before, the unit operation of bed adsorption may be carried out in a moving-bed mode, either co-currently or countercurrently. When the breakthrough experiment is carried out, the superficial velocity should also be recorded. The reason is that adsorption is a function of the time of contact between the liquid phase containing the solute to be adsorbed and solid-phase carbon bed. Thus, for the breakthrough data to be applicable to an actual prototype adsorption column, the relative velocities that transpired during the test must be maintained in the actual column. When the relative velocities between the flowing water and the carbon bed are maintained, it is immaterial whether or not the bed is moving. 

In a breakthrough experiment, the superficial velocity may be obtained by dividing the volume V of water collected in t time by the superficial area of the experimental column. Breakthrough experiments are invariably conducted in stationary beds. Thus, from the previous equations this superficial velocity is actually the relative velocity of the flowing water with respect to the bed, with Vj equal to zero. This relative velocity must be maintained in the actual column design, if the data collected in the breakthrough experiment are to be applicable. 

The results from the breakthrough experiments are collected in Table 1. As expected, the samples differ in HjS adsorption whereas the adsorption of SOj is comparable [12, 13]. Much higher HjS breakthrough capacity is obtained for SC-2 than for SC-1 (three fold difference). It is worth to mention that the obtained capacities are slightly smaller than those reported previously [12, 13]. This is likely the result of fertilizer oxidation during its exposure to air. After exhaustion in SOj breakthrough tests still some capacity for HjS exists and, especially on the SC-2 sample. 

All the samples collected during the breakthrough experiments were analyzed using a Shimadzu GC (Gas Chromatography) unit equipped with a polar column, an automatic multi-sampler, and a FID detector. The minimum thiophene concentration detection was around 10 ppmw or 4 ppmw on a sulfur basis. 

The breakthrough experiments were performed through the adsorption pressure of 5 to 9 atm, and feed flow rate of 4.5 to 9.1 LSTP/min. And the desorption experiments were performed through 2 to 4 LSTP/min at constant pressure of 1.5 atm. 

Once a mechanism for isolation and an elution solvent are selected, it is necessary to perform a simple breakthrough experiment (in Chapter 4 there will be a more detailed explanation of breakthrough experiments). The breakthrough experiment is simply a measure of the volume of sample that may be passed through the sorbent before the analyte is no longer retained. 

The breakthrough experiment was carried out by Whitham et al. [39,40] in France. They used a Smalley-type laser vaporization source (Fig. 4) to provide a molecular beam of Ca atoms entrained in He or Ar gas. The second harmonic (532 nm) from a pulsed Nd YAG laser was focused (Fig. 4) on a rotating calcium rod. About 500 jus prior to this, a pulsed valve (left side of Fig. 4) is opened and the plume of vaporized metal is entrained in Ar or He gas. The carrier gas is seeded with a few percent of the oxidant such as H20. The plume of excited- and ground-state metal atoms are carried down a short channel and react with the oxidant. At the end of the channel, the product molecules such as CaOH expand into the vacuum chamber and cool. After a short expansion, the pressure has dropped so low that the molecules are effectively in a collisionless, ultracold (<10K) environment. 

Plasma comprises the majority of the universe the solar corona, solar wind, nebula, and Earth s ionosphere are all plasmas. The best known natural plasma phenomenon in Earth s atmosphere is lightning. The breakthrough experiments with this natural form of plasma were performed long ago by Benjamin Franklin (Fig. 1-1), which probably explains the special interest in plasma research in Philadelphia, where the author of the book works at the Drexel Plasma Institute (Drexel University). 

In the desorption expoiment (Hgure S), the effect of the feed flow rate had similar effect with the breakthrough experiment. 

Until now, the reports of adsorptive separation of CO2 and other gases in a mixture by using MOFs, conducted by experimental separation process, are limited. Among various characterization methods in separation, the breakthrough experiment and gas chromatographic separation are simple and straightforward in the evaluation of the separation performance of a MOF toward a gas mixture. On the other hand, as previously mentioned, reported CO2 separation in MOFs mainly includes CO2/N2 separation for post-combustion capture, CO2/H2 from synthesis gas for pre-combustion capture, and O2/N2 and CO2/CO separation for oxy-combustion capture, which will be detailed as following. 

The breakthrough experiment came in 1906, although hardly anyone noticed until decades later—and then, as they say, the rest is history. At that time, the Italian-Russian botanist, Mikhail Tsvet (1872-1919), was trying to separate the plant pigments, chlorophylls and carotenoids, by adsorbing them from a petroleum ether solution onto a solid material. Let us read his own words as he describes his discovery [14] ... 

---