Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Temperature static headspace extraction

There are many factors involved in optimizing static headspace extraction for extraction efficiency, sensitivity, quantitation, and reproducibility. These include vial and sample volume, temperature, pressure, and the form of the matrix itself, as described above. The appropriate choice of physical conditions may be both analyte and matrix dependent, and when there are multiple analytes, compromises may be necessary. [Pg.187]

The equipment for static headspace extraction consists of a container, where equilibrium takes place, a device that heats the container at a constant temperature and an injection device, which transfers a portion of the headspace gas to the gas chromatograph. The container is a glass vial of between 5 ml and 25 ml capacity, which is sealed with a septum coated with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and an aluminum cap, using a crimp. Injection... [Pg.199]

Several factors must be optimized in a static headspace extraction in order to obtain a method with the desired extraction sensitivity, reproducibility and efficiency. These factors include the volume of the used vial, the temperature and pressure levels, and how the sample is to be prepared. [Pg.201]

Where A is the area of the chromatographic peak obtained for the analyte, is the concentration of analyte in the headspace, C° is the concentration of analyte in the liquid sample, K is the partition coefficient, and P is the ratio volume of the phases. The partition coefficient depends on the extraction temperature, while P is determined by the relative volume between the two phases In static headspace extraction the sensitivity depends on the solubility of the analyte in the matrix for analytes with a high partition coefficient, the most important parameter is the extraction temperature, since most of the analyte is in the liquid phase and it can only be passed into the headspace by heating the vial on the other hand, for analj es with low partition coefficients, they are already present in the headsp>aoe even without any heating, so in this case, the most important parameter is the volume relation between the phases. That is, increasing the extraction temperature is only effective in polar volatile analytes, while the sensitivity of non-pelar analytes remains essentially unchanged by the increase of the extraction temperature (Slack, et aL, 2003). [Pg.201]

A substantial amount of information on volatiles can be obtained with less than 30 g of each of these samples in a direct DHS/GC/MS analysis. DHS operation sweeps volatile flavors from the surface of food samples in a similar way as we sniff for the volatile flavors of a food. DHS does not require high sampling temperature or solvent for extraction and may be considered as a lcw-artifact arcma sampling technique. The concentrating effect of DHS provides better sensitivity than static headspace sampling. Techniques such as GC-coupled aroma perception and GC/MS identification can be used to complement other approaches in improvement of flavor quality of a variety of products. [Pg.393]

This term can be applied to a number of techniques including static headspace, purge and trap, and thermal desorption. All of these techniques involve the extraction of a gaseous component from a solid or liquid sample. Static headspace is usually a one step technique where the componait of interest is extracted from the sample held in a closed vessel usually at elevated temperatures and then injected onto the GC. Purge and trap is a multistep technique where the compound of interest is extracted into a matrix and then thermally desorbed onto the GC for analysis. SPME used in conjunction with GC analysis could be considered a purge and trap technique. In thermal desorption, the sample is heated r idly and isolated using a cryogenic trap with the compounds isolated thermally desorbed. [Pg.2078]

In the static mode, the sample is placed into an extraction vessel, filled with a supercritical fluid at the appropriated temperature and pressure, and allowed to stand for a period. When the extraction is complete, the supercritical fluid is released through a trap to collect the analytes. Static extraction allows analytes with slow mass transfer time to be solvated by the SF. In addition, the use of a known concentration of modifier is possible by direct addition of the modifier to the extraction cell. The main limitation of static extraction is its inability to perform an exhaustive extraction. As in static headspace GC, and the traditional liqnid-liquid extraction, as a result of the equilibrium of the analyte between the matrix and SF, one extraction can not exhaustively extract the analyte from the matrix. Consequently, it is often necessary to perform multiple static extraction. The use of SFE has been decreasing over the years in part due to the growth of accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), which employs much of the same instrumentation and methodology of Sra. [Pg.593]

Heat extraction techniques for solid sample preparation in GC are static and dynamic headspace analysis (SHS, DHS, HS-SPME and HSSE), thermal desorption (TD-GC, TD-GC-MS), pyrolysis and thermochromatography. Nomenclature is not unambiguous as to DHS, TD and PT. The terminology purge-and-trap is usually preferred for the simplest dynamic technique in which it is not necessary to subject the sample to either solvents or elevated temperatures. Scheme 2.7 shows the family of headspace sampling techniques. Headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE) and HS-SPME represent high capacity static headspace. [Pg.282]

The static headspace method is therefore an indirect analysis procedure, requiring special care in performing quantitative determinations. The position of the equilibrium depends on the analysis parameters (e.g. temperature) and also on the sample matrix itself. The matrix dependence of the procedure can be counteracted in various ways. The matrix can be standardized, for example, by addition of Na2S04 or NajCOj. Other possibilities include the standard addition method, internal standardization or the multiple headspace extraction procedure (MHE) as published by (Kolb and Ettre, 1991 Zhu et al., 2005) (Figure 2.11). [Pg.28]

Static headsp>ace extraction, also known as equilibrium headsp>ace extraction, is one of the techniques used for qualitative and quantitative analysis of volatile substances in the forensic field, in this technique the sample is placed in a closed vial, the volatile analytes disseminate into the headspace of the vial (figure 1), once equilibrium is reached between the analyte concentration in the headspace and the analyte concentration in the sample, a portion of the headspace is taken and injected into the gas chromatograph this can be done manually or with an autosampler, this process will be usually carried out at a pressure and temperature above ambient conditions (Slack et al., 2003). [Pg.199]


See other pages where Temperature static headspace extraction is mentioned: [Pg.188]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.1052]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.828]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.249]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.188 ]




SEARCH



Headspace

Headspace extraction

Headspace static

Static extraction

Static temperature

© 2024 chempedia.info