Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Temperature programmed desorption, for

Gorte, R. J. (1996) Temperature-programmed desorption for oxide catalysts. Catalysis Today 405-414. [Pg.432]

The organization of one TPR or TPO experiment is somehow different in comparison with that one applied for temperature-programmed desorption. For example, the sample has to be purged with inactive gas, before exposure to active (reductive or oxidative) gas. These differences can be seen in Table4.1, which presents the organisation of both TPD and TPR/TPO experiments. [Pg.145]

R.J. Gorte, Temperature-programmed desorption for the characterization of oxide catalysts. Catal. Today 28,405-414 (1996). doi 10.1016/S0920-5861(96)00249-0... [Pg.173]

In a recent paper [11] this approach has been generalized to deal with reactions at surfaces, notably dissociation of molecules. A lattice gas model is employed for homonuclear molecules with both atoms and molecules present on the surface, also accounting for lateral interactions between all species. In a series of model calculations equilibrium properties, such as heats of adsorption, are discussed, and the role of dissociation disequilibrium on the time evolution of an adsorbate during temperature-programmed desorption is examined. This approach is adaptable to more complicated systems, provided the individual species remain in local equilibrium, allowing of course for dissociation and reaction disequilibria. [Pg.443]

Figure 2.27. Temperature programmed desorption (TPD) spectra of carbon monoxide (measured by Ap) as a function of temperature from nickel surfaces (a) Ni(l 11), (b) Ni(l 11) when the initially dosed surface has been subjected to an electron beam (150 pA for 10 minutes over an area of 1 mm2) and (c) a cleaved nickel surface.85 Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Science. Figure 2.27. Temperature programmed desorption (TPD) spectra of carbon monoxide (measured by Ap) as a function of temperature from nickel surfaces (a) Ni(l 11), (b) Ni(l 11) when the initially dosed surface has been subjected to an electron beam (150 pA for 10 minutes over an area of 1 mm2) and (c) a cleaved nickel surface.85 Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Science.
Several spectroscopic, microscopic and diffraction techniques are used to investigate catalysts. As Fig. 4.2 illustrates, such techniques are based on some type of excitation (in-going arrows in Fig. 4.2) to which the catalyst responds (symbolized by the outgoing arrows). For example, irradiating a catalyst with X-ray photons generates photoelectrons, which are employed in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) -one of the most useful characterization tools. One can also heat a spent catalyst and look at what temperatures reaction intermediates and products desorb from the surface (temperature-programmed desorption, TPD). [Pg.130]

Figure 7.6. Experimental set up for temperature-programmed desorption in ultrahigh vacuum. The heat dissipated in the tantalum wires resistively heats the crystal the temperature is measured by a thermocouple spot-welded to the back of the crystal. A temperature programmer heats the crystal at a rate of typically 1-5 K s b Desorption of gases... Figure 7.6. Experimental set up for temperature-programmed desorption in ultrahigh vacuum. The heat dissipated in the tantalum wires resistively heats the crystal the temperature is measured by a thermocouple spot-welded to the back of the crystal. A temperature programmer heats the crystal at a rate of typically 1-5 K s b Desorption of gases...
Elementary steps in which a bond is broken form a particularly important class of reactions in catalysis. The essence of catalytic action is often that the catalyst activates a strong bond that cannot be broken in a direct reaction, but which is effectively weakened in the interaction with the surface, as we explained in Chapter 6. To monitor a dissociation reaction we need special techniques. Temperature-programmed desorption is an excellent tool for monitoring reactions in which products desorb. However, when the reaction products remain on the surface, one needs to employ different methods such as infrared spectroscopy or secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). [Pg.282]

Figure 7.12. Dissociation of NO N + O in a temperature-programmed desorption and static SIMS experiment, along with Monte Carlo simulations, showing the effect of lateral interactions (see text for explanation). The bottom part shows representative arrangements of NO molecules (grey), and... Figure 7.12. Dissociation of NO N + O in a temperature-programmed desorption and static SIMS experiment, along with Monte Carlo simulations, showing the effect of lateral interactions (see text for explanation). The bottom part shows representative arrangements of NO molecules (grey), and...
The SCR catalyst is considerably more complex than, for example, the metal catalysts we discussed earlier. Also, it is very difficult to perform surface science studies on these oxide surfaces. The nature of the active sites in the SCR catalyst has been probed by temperature-programmed desorption of NO and NH3 and by in situ infrared studies. This has led to a set of kinetic parameters (Tab. 10.7) that can describe NO conversion and NH3 slip (Fig. 10.16). The model gives a good fit to the experimental data over a wide range, is based on the physical reality of the SCR catalyst and its interactions with the reacting gases and is, therefore, preferable to a simple power rate law in which catalysis happens in a black box . Nevertheless, several questions remain unanswered, such as what are the elementary steps and what do the active site looks like on the atomic scale ... [Pg.399]

Describe the experimental set-up for temperature-programmed desorption from a single crystal surface. [Pg.409]

Derive the rate expression for temperature-programmed desorption (i.e. the rate versus temperature at a constant heating rate). [Pg.409]

The scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) was used to directly observe nm size crystallites of supported platinum, palladium and first row transition metals. The objective of these studies was to determine the uniformity of size and mass of these crystallites and when feasible structural features. STEM analysis and temperature programmed desorption (TPD) of hydrogen Indicate that the 2 nm platinum crystallites supported on alumina are uniform In size and mass while platinum crystallites 3 to 4 nm in size vary by a factor of three-fold In mass. Analysis by STEM of platinum-palladium dn alumina established the segregation of platinum and palladium for the majority of crystallites analyzed even after exposure to elevated temperatures. Direct observation of nickel, cobalt, or iron crystallites on alumina was very difficult, however, the use of direct elemental analysis of 4-6 nm areas and real time Imaging capabilities of up to 20 Mx enabled direct analyses of these transition metals to be made. Additional analyses by TPD of hydrogen and photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS) were made to support the STEM observations. [Pg.374]

Specific surface areas of the catalysts used were determined by nitrogen adsorption (77.4 K) employing BET method via Sorptomatic 1900 (Carlo-Erba). X-ray difiraction (XRD) patterns of powdered catalysts were carried out on a Siemens D500 (0 / 20) dififactometer with Cu K monochromatic radiation. For the temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) experiments the catalyst (0.3 g) was pre-treated at diflferent temperatures (100-700 °C) under helium flow (5-20 Nml min ) in a micro-catalytic tubular reactor for 3 hours. The treated sample was exposed to methanol vapor (0.01-0.10 kPa) for 2 hours at 260 °C. The system was cooled at room temperature under helium for 30 minutes and then heated at the rate of 4 °C min . Effluents were continuously analyzed using a quadruple mass spectrometer (type QMG420, Balzers AG). [Pg.173]

This study presents kinetic data obtained with a microreactor set-up both at atmospheric pressure and at high pressures up to 50 bar as a function of temperature and of the partial pressures from which power-law expressions and apparent activation energies are derived. An additional microreactor set-up equipped with a calibrated mass spectrometer was used for the isotopic exchange reaction (DER) N2 + N2 = 2 N2 and the transient kinetic experiments. The transient experiments comprised the temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of N2 and H2. Furthermore, the interaction of N2 with Ru surfaces was monitored by means of temperature-programmed adsorption (TPA) using a dilute mixture of N2 in He. The kinetic data set is intended to serve as basis for a detailed microkinetic analysis of NH3 synthesis kinetics [10] following the concepts by Dumesic et al. [11]. [Pg.318]

Accessibility to Cu sites was determined by temperature programmed desorption of NO (NO TPD), using an experimental setup similar to that used for TPR, except the detector was a quadrupole mass spectrometer (Balzers QMS421) calibrated on standard mixtures. The samples were first activated in air at 673 K, cooled to room temperature in air, and saturated with NO (NO/He 1/99, vol/vol). They were then flushed with He until no NO could be detected in the effluent, and TPD was started up to 873 K at a heating rate of 10 K/min with an helium flow of 50 cm min. The amount of NO held on the surface was determined from the peak area of the TPD curves. [Pg.622]

Temperature-programmed desorption of mesitylene shows a marked difference to the catalysts prepared on MgCl2 surfaces. The spectrum contains only one desorption peak at aroimd 250 K. Due to the similar desorption temperature to the peak observed for MgCl2-based films, this peak was assigned to desorption from low coordinated or defect sites [118]. [Pg.137]


See other pages where Temperature programmed desorption, for is mentioned: [Pg.361]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.712]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.133]   


SEARCH



Desorption programmed

Desorption temperature

Desorption temperature-programmed

Temperature program

Temperature programmed

Temperature programming

Temperature-programed desorption

© 2024 chempedia.info