Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Temperature dependence phase boundary

Because the reaction takes place in the Hquid, the amount of Hquid held in the contacting vessel is important, as are the Hquid physical properties such as viscosity, density, and surface tension. These properties affect gas bubble size and therefore phase boundary area and diffusion properties for rate considerations. Chemically, the oxidation rate is also dependent on the concentration of the anthrahydroquinone, the actual oxygen concentration in the Hquid, and the system temperature (64). The oxidation reaction is also exothermic, releasing the remaining 45% of the heat of formation from the elements. Temperature can be controUed by the various options described under hydrogenation. Added heat release can result from decomposition of hydrogen peroxide or direct reaction of H2O2 and hydroquinone (HQ) at a catalytic site (eq. 19). [Pg.476]

The precise positions of the various phase boundaries depend on the temperature of formation. [Pg.357]

In sulphur dioxide linear kinetics are generally observed due to control by phase boundary reactions, i.e. adsorption of SOj. RahmeF suggested that this is one of the conditions which favours simultaneous nucleation of sulphide and oxide at the gas/scale interface. The main reaction products are NiO, NijSj, Ni-S,j, and NiS04, depending on the temperature and gas pressure for example, according to the following reaction ... [Pg.1058]

The temperature dependence of lower phases boundary compositions needs to be established. [Pg.125]

Fujiwara et al. studied the precipitation phase boundary diagrams of the sodium salts of a-sulfonated myristic and palmitic acid methyl esters in the presence of calcium ions [61]. The time dependency of the precipitation showed that the calcium salts have an extremely slow crystallization rate at room temperatures. This is the reason for the good hardness tolerance of the a-sulfonated fatty acid methyl esters. [Pg.481]

Sato et al.11 realized that for these lyotropic systems, whose phase boundaries have little temperature dependence, an investigation of the handedness in the widest possible temperature interval should be carried out. As the cholesteric handedness in a few cases is opposite at different temperatures, the data at a single temperature are meaningless. Using a simple thermodynamic analysis, they proposed a plot of the cholesteric wavenumber qc (the reciprocal pitch) as a function of the reciprocal temperature 1 IT [Eq. (1)]... [Pg.437]

Reid et al. [ 1.12] described the effect of 1 % addition certain polymers on the heterogeneous nucleation rate at-18 °C the rate was 30 times greater than in distilled, microfiltered water and at -15 °C, the factor was still 10 fold hogher. All added polymers (1 %) influenced the nucleation rate in a more or less temperature-dependent manner. However, the authors could not identify a connection between the polymer structure and nucleation rate. None the less it became clear that the growth of dendritic ice crystals depended on to factors (i) the concentration of the solution (5 % to 30 % sucrose) and (ii) the rate at which the phase boundary water - ice crystals moved. However, the growth was found to be independent of the freezing rate. (Note of the author the freezing rate influences the boundary rate). [Pg.21]

For phase diagrams, a phase boundary is one end of a tie-line and, therefore, is dependent on the phase which exists at the other end of the tie-line. In a binary system, two independent measurements are therefore needed to define the tie-line in the case of a liquid/solid phase boundary this would be and Xg at temperature T. Ideally it would be desirable to have these two compositions as independent variables giving rise to two independent equations of error. The Lukas programme does this by making two equations but where the dependence of error on one of the measurements is weak. This is important if the two concentrations have different accuracies. For some types of experimental values newer versions of the Lukas programme offer different kinds of equations of error (Lukas and Fries 1992). [Pg.308]

When the enzyme is incubated at 4 °C with aqueous buffer, a very small deactivation constant is found. In the presence of a second phase of MTBE, deactivation is 30% higher (4 °C). The highest increase in enzyme deactivation is due to the temperature the deactivation constants are 22-fold (1.3 x 17) or 255-fold (15 X 17) higher when incubating the enzyme at 20 °C in pure buffer or in a two-phase system respectively. In the presence of the substrate benzaldehyde almost the entire enzyme is deactivated within 1 h. This deactivation in a two-phase system is to some extent dependent on the size of the phase boundary and can... [Pg.423]

The value of sj v is almost constant (6-7 kcal mol" ) in the measured temperature range and the positive value means that the vacancy-vacancy interaction is repulsive. On the other hand, the value of (/iNis + ) changes sign from minus to plus with increasing temperature. Upon substituting eqns (1.145) for (jUnjs + fi ) and, from eqns (1.146) and (1.147), eqn (1.145) can be rewritten as the relation between y, Uj, and T, as shown in Fig. 1.36. The curves for phase boundaries (thicker curves), i.e. the upper curve for coexistent condensed phases (Ni. S phase + adjacent sulfur rich phase) and the lower curve for coexistent condensed phases (Ni. S phase + adjacent sulfur poor phase), were taken from Refs 26 and 27, in which the temperature dependence of Ps. for coexistent samples was investigated in detail. (As mentioned in Section 1.2, the relationship between the equilibrium sulfur pressure for coexistent condensed phases and temperature must show one to one correspondence. Rau calculated <5 in Nij S for the coexistent phases by substitution of the data from refs 26 and 27 for Os and T into eqn (1.145).)... [Pg.57]

The temperature dependence of the water-phase exchange velocity, v,w, is stronger for the boundary layer model than for the film model. Why ... [Pg.940]


See other pages where Temperature dependence phase boundary is mentioned: [Pg.236]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.1897]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.93]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.309 ]




SEARCH



Phase Dependence

Phase boundaries

Phase dependency

Temperature dependence, phase

© 2024 chempedia.info