Technology transfer and scale

MacLennan Troll, E. Technology transfer and scale-up. In Preparing for FDA Preapproval Inspections, (M. D. Hynes, ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 215-231, 1998. 

The Conference s purpose is to improve technology transfer and exchange, thereby leading to a better understanding and solving of both small-scale and large-scale environmental problems. 

MORRIS N, VAN DER REIS A p (1980). The transferability of rating scale techniques to an African population. Technology Transfer and Res 11 417 36. 

Contract companies can provide more than simply additional capacity. They can provide translation of bench-scale operations to cGMP compliant manufacturing, technology transfer, and process validation [104]. Contract services also are provided by equipment suppliers to optimize/develop processes using their equipment [90]. These services can be more cost-effective than third-party laboratories, contract manufacturing, or in-house. 

Williamson, Bess. 2008. Small Scale Technology for the Developing World Volunteers for International Technical Assistance, 1959-1971. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society 6, no. 3 (December) 236-58. 

An improved ability to address the key issues of technology transfer and manufacture scale-up. 

V. Reyes, Comparison between TraditionalandModem Automatic Controllers on Eull-scale Precipitators, Seventh Symposium on Transfer and Utilization of Particulate Control Technology, Nashville, Term., March 1988, F. L. Smidth Co., Valby, Denmark. 

The external-loop slurry airlift reactor was used in a pilot plant (3000 t/a) for one-step synthesis of dimethyl ether (DME) from syngas. Specially designed internals were used to intensify mass transfer and heat removal. This new technology is highly efficient and easy to scale-up to industrial. 

Facihties and administrative costs (F A), in technology transfer, 24 376-377 Facihties design, safety of, 21 846-852 Facihties operation, safe, 21 853—854 Facihfy control hierarchy, 20 673—676 Facility erection, nondestructive evaluation during, 17 414 Facility-siting checklist, 19 532—535t FAC scale, 10 827... 

The possibilities afforded by SAM-controlled electrochemical metal deposition were already demonstrated some time ago by Sondag-Huethorst et al. [36] who used patterned SAMs as templates to deposit metal structures with line widths below 100 nm. While this initial work illustrated the potential of SAM-controlled deposition on the nanometer scale further activities towards technological exploitation have been surprisingly moderate and mostly concerned with basic studies on metal deposition on uniform, alkane thiol-based SAMs [37-40] that have been extended in more recent years to aromatic thiols [41-43]. A major reason for the slow development of this area is that electrochemical metal deposition with, in principle, the advantage of better control via the electrochemical potential compared to none-lectrochemical methods such as electroless metal deposition or evaporation, is quite critical in conjunction with SAMs. Relying on their ability to act as barriers for charge transfer and particle diffusion, the minimization of defects in and control of the structural quality of SAMs are key to their performance and set the limits for their nanotechnological applications. 

---