Teams redesigning

Defining Process Barriers. If a business process does not exist or simply doesn t work, the redesign team needs to know why. In some cases, the reason maybe simply that no one recognized the need for a given system similarly, a system may remain "broken" because no one realized it needed fixing, or knew how to go about it. In others, the team may... 

A key advantage of the business process redesign approach is that while it draws on past experience (in the form of the team s collective expertise) it is not bound by it. This helps minimize the risk that inadequate practices may become institutionalized through habit or neglect, and forces the team to take a fresh look at the critical processes under review. At the same time, this approach requires more concentrated effort than either TQM or model programs and may not be necessary in cases where incremental improvement is all that s required to address PSM gaps. 

What Is the Expected Process for Their Work. This requires a clear presentation of the approach (TQM, process redesign, model programs, other), which will to some extent dictate the working process. In addition, specifics about team leadership, the role (if any) of facilitators or advisors. 

Industrial scientists, therefore, hold a very high public trust. There is a need to go beyond the requirements of scientific canons and demonstrate to the lay public that its trust has been upheld. A number of industrial firms have recognized and responded to this need. Wilder, of Eastman Chemical, for example, describes a proactive pollution prevention policy developed in partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency.112 This work describes the key role of analytics in helping chemical manufacturers take leadership roles in redesigning processes for waste prevention. Since the analytical laboratory is a principal referee in the production process, there is always a risk that time pressures will tempt some members of the production team to "work the referee". An important function of the chain of command of the analytical laboratory, therefore, is establishing a clear operational policy to ensure that any such pressure does not reach the bench level ... 

Motivational Job Design 2.2.1. Historical Background 2.2.2. Design 874 874 875 Design of Jobs or Teams 4.2.2. Procedures for Redesigning Existing Jobs or Teams 884 885... 

IMPLEMENTATION ADVICE FOR JOB AND TEAM DESIGN 4.1. When to Consider Design and Redesign of Work... 

Individual vs. group designs for work. A key initial decision is to either enrich individual jobs or create self-managing work teams. This also includes consideration of whether any redesign should be undertaken and its likelihood of success. 

Use by a redesign effort of a maintenance crew (at Texas Instruments) to determine that the team-based approach they had envisioned needed several important improvements prior to startup. 

Initially, a cross-functional team was formed to redesign the process and implement the changes. The customer service manager was appointed as the head of this team. Customer interviews and internal studies were conducted to target inefficiencies and determine their root causes. The resulting information was shared with aU of the 1200 employees at CAV. 

The team s success was successful because they had planned prior to redesigning the procedures within the facility. Relevant data on the products were first gathered, such as ... 

Armed with the facts collected in the first stage, reengineering teams identify areas for improvement. They analyze where value was added for the final customer, with particular emphasis on customer contact points and product information transfers that are currently ineffective or inefficient. After identification of improvement points the creative phase of redesigning business process and information flow begins. The outcomes of the creative phase will fundamentally change both the nature of the work and how it is performed. 

Individual differences in job design/redesign, 886-888 and team design, 886-888 Individualism (in national cultures), 957 Individual learning, 1250, 1400 Individual measurement, control charts for, 1841-1844... 

---