Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

System peaks Selectivity

As stated in Section I, columns should be selected so the low molar mass portions of the samples in question can be sufficiently separated from the elution interval of the system peaks. This task cannot always be accomplished, e.g., dimethylacetamide often replaces dimethylformamide as a GPC eluent the analyzed, mostly polar, samples require a neutral salt (e.g., FiBr) (7). The calibration is usually carried out with poly(methylmethacrylate) standards... [Pg.439]

As a consequence of the development of extraction methods for STA based on mixed-mode SPE columns, as well as of the recent introduction of instruments for the automated sample preparation allowing efficient evaporation and derivatization of the extracts, full automation of STA methods based on GC-MS analysis is also available. It needs GC-MS instalments equipped with an HP PrepStation System. The samples directly injected by the PrepStation are analyzed by full scan GC-MS. Using macrocommands, peak identification and reporting of the results are also automated. Each ion of interest is automatically selected, retention time is calculated, and the peak area is determined. All data are checked for interference, peak selection, and baseline determination. [Pg.315]

Certain SEC applications solicit specific experimental conditions. The most common reason is the limited sample solubility. In this case, special solvents or increased temperature are inavoid-able. A possibility to improve sample solubility and quality of eluent offer multicomponent solvents (Sections 16.2.2 and 16.8.2). The selectivity of polymer separation by SEC drops with the deteriorating eluent quality due to decreasing differences in the hydrodynamic volume of macromolecules with different molar masses. The system peaks appear on the chromatograms obtained with mixed eluents due to preferential solvation of sample molecules (Sections 16.3.2 and 16.3.3). The multicomponent eluents may create system peaks also as a result of the (preferential) sorption of their components within column packing [144,145]. The extent of preferential sorption is often sensitive toward pressure variations [69,70,146-149]. Even if the specific detectors are used, which do not see the eluent composition changes, it is necessary to discriminate the bulk sample solvent from the SEC separated macromolecules otherwise the determined molecular characteristics can be affected. This is especially important if the analyzed polymer contains a tail of fractions possessing lower molar masses (Sections 16.4.4 and 16.4.5). [Pg.474]

As preferably one user should be able to operate the whole system, it becomes clear that a highly integrated system is needed. Even if the peak selection is carried out by the user, the positioning of the sample, followed by the start of the NMR and MS experiments, must take place automatically. An integrated LC-NMR/MS system therefore has to contain the following components ... [Pg.43]

Fig. 19. Schematic design of a flow injection analysis (FIA) system. A selection valve (top) allows a selection between sample stream and standard(s). The selected specimen is pumped through an injection loop. Repeatedly, the injection valve is switched for a short while so that the contents of the loop are transported by the carrier stream into the dispersion/reaction manifold. In this manifold, any type of chemical or physical reaction can be implemented (e.g. by addition of other chemicals, passing through an enzyme column, dilution by another injection, diffusion through a membrane, liquid-liquid extraction, etc. not shown). On its way through the manifold, the original plug undergoes axial dispersion which results in the typical shape of the finally detected signal peak... Fig. 19. Schematic design of a flow injection analysis (FIA) system. A selection valve (top) allows a selection between sample stream and standard(s). The selected specimen is pumped through an injection loop. Repeatedly, the injection valve is switched for a short while so that the contents of the loop are transported by the carrier stream into the dispersion/reaction manifold. In this manifold, any type of chemical or physical reaction can be implemented (e.g. by addition of other chemicals, passing through an enzyme column, dilution by another injection, diffusion through a membrane, liquid-liquid extraction, etc. not shown). On its way through the manifold, the original plug undergoes axial dispersion which results in the typical shape of the finally detected signal peak...
From the view point of the assessment, the quality of an HPLC separation in response to changes in different system variables, such as the stationary phase particle diameter, the column configuration, the flow rate, or mobile phase composition, or alternatively, changes in a solute variable such as the molecular size, net charge, charge anisotropy, or hydrophobic cluster distribution of a protein, can be based on evaluation of the system peak capacity (PC) in the analytical modes of HPLC separations and the system productivity (Peff) parameters in terms of bioactive mass recovered throughput per unit time at a specified purity level and operational cost structure. The system peak capacity PC depends on the relative selectivity and the bandwidth, and can be defined as... [Pg.160]

Figures 1 and 3 show that although the modulations of the three-pulse, or stimulated echo are less intense than those of its two-pulse counterpart, the resolution is much higher and the spectrum is simplified because combination peaks only enter into the data through the presence of multiple ESEEM-active nuclei. Equation (8) shows that for an S = 1 /2, 7 = 1/2 spin system, judicious selection of the r-value can control the ESEEM amplitudes of the hyperfine frequencies from a and electron spin manifolds allowing them to be optimized or suppressed. For weakly coupled protons, where the modulation frequencies from both electron spin manifolds are centered at the proton Larmor frequency, x can be set at an integer multiple of the proton Earmor frequency to suppress the contributions of this family of coupled nuclei from the three-pulse ESEEM spectrum. It is common for three-pulse ESEEM data to be collected at several r-values, including integer multiples of the proton Larmor period, to accentuate the other low frequency modulations present in the data and to make sure that ESEEM components were not missed because of T-suppression. Figures 1 and 3 show that although the modulations of the three-pulse, or stimulated echo are less intense than those of its two-pulse counterpart, the resolution is much higher and the spectrum is simplified because combination peaks only enter into the data through the presence of multiple ESEEM-active nuclei. Equation (8) shows that for an S = 1 /2, 7 = 1/2 spin system, judicious selection of the r-value can control the ESEEM amplitudes of the hyperfine frequencies from a and electron spin manifolds allowing them to be optimized or suppressed. For weakly coupled protons, where the modulation frequencies from both electron spin manifolds are centered at the proton Larmor frequency, x can be set at an integer multiple of the proton Earmor frequency to suppress the contributions of this family of coupled nuclei from the three-pulse ESEEM spectrum. It is common for three-pulse ESEEM data to be collected at several r-values, including integer multiples of the proton Larmor period, to accentuate the other low frequency modulations present in the data and to make sure that ESEEM components were not missed because of T-suppression.
In this case, the system of equations of a model of chromatography (Chapter 2) must be solved numerically. These models are very general. They apply to all modes of chromatography, independently of the model of competitive isotherms selected. Most theoretical studies used the equUibrium-dispersive model of chromatography because the mass transfer kinetics are fast xmder the experimental conditions employed in the study of system peaks. These theoretical studies also used the Langmuir competitive model because it is both general and convenient. [Pg.628]

In Figure 13.13b, the compound has a bimodal profile the signal obtained with a selective detector suggests strongly that there are two partially resolved isomers. The signal of a nonselective detector exhibits a trough behind a major peak, features that are difficult to explain for an analyst who is not well aware of the riddles that system peaks may present occasionally. [Pg.630]

Indirect detection is an alternative to derivatization for the detection of analytes with a weak detector response. It is commonly used in ion exchange (particularly ion chromatography) and ion-pair chromatography with absorbance, fluorescence or amperometric detection [168,254,255]. This requires the selection of an eluent ion with favorable detection properties to regulate the separation process and provide a constant detector signal. Detector transparent analyte ions cause displacement of eluent ions from the eluted band and a decrease in the detector response compared with the steady state signal for the mobile phase. The detected ion concentration is coupled to the retention mechanism, which can result in the appearance of additional system peaks in the chromatogram (section 4.3.3.2). These applications should be... [Pg.490]

In contrast to other studies, oxidation carried out in this department on a Pt/7-Al203 catalyst has not uncovered any oscillatory behaviour in the temperature range of 100-185 °C. Addition of a hydrocarbon like but-l-ene, but-2-ene, or propene induces sinusoidal or relaxation type oscillations at temperatures above 150 °C. The experimental set-up used consists of a continuous recycle reactor system. The catalyst is packed in the cylindrical tubes. The gas flow rates are precisely measured with a bubble flow-meter. The reactor outlet is connected to a magnetic deflection mass spectrometer. An electronic peak select unit allows up to four mass numbers to be continuously monitored. The output data are connected to a PDP 11/45 computer for automatic and fast data logging. The data thus stored in the computer can be analysed later. The line diagram of the experimental set up is given in Figure 1. [Pg.4]

Ideally, an internal marker should be a polymeric species under the same influences as the samples. In practice, since the elution volume range available in SEC is very limited, the internal markers used normally have low molecular mass, either added solvents or system peaks, for instance those due to antioxidant [11]. However, some care is required, as these solvent or system peaks can shift as a consequence of non-size exclusion effects, for instance moisture content of solvent encouraging selective adsorption. An internal marker is run at the same time as the calibrants, and when samples are run, the elution times of the internal marker are compared and the elution times of the sample are adjusted to correspond to the calibration. [Pg.48]

Our initial objective was to evaluate the amylose component of different genetic varieties of starch. The exclusion volume of the particular column system was selected to end at 13 to 14 minutes the early peak in the chromatogram is actually excluded material. This peak represents higher molecular weight materials and probably contains amylopectin Molecular weight approximations were limited to the highest pullulan molecular weight of 853 000 at a retention time of about 18 minutes. [Pg.207]

The point is that if this particular chromatographic system is selective for these two compounds, then in principle they are separable. Selectivity, in simplest terms, is the distance between two peaks, from the top of one peak to the top of the other. This is different from the resolution in that for the determination of the selectivity the form of the peak (plate number) is not considered, because a is only the quotient of two (retention) times. The separation factor depends only on the chemistry see below on the subject of retention factor. [Pg.11]


See other pages where System peaks Selectivity is mentioned: [Pg.477]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.929]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.773]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.740]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.1575]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.741]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.86]   


SEARCH



Peak selectivity

System peaks

© 2024 chempedia.info