Measurement surfactant adsorption

Table VIIL Mineral Composition (Weight%) of Rocks Used in Surfactant Adsorption Measurements...

The colloid probe technique was first applied to the investigation of surfactant adsorption by Rutland and Senden [83]. They investigated the effect of a nonionic surfactant petakis(oxyethylene) dodecyl ether at various concentrations for a silica-silica system. In the absence of surfactant they observed a repulsive interaction at small separation, which inhibited adhesive contact. For a concentration of 2 X 10 M they found a normalized adhesive force of 19 mN/m, which is small compared to similar measurements with SEA and is probably caused by sufactant adsorption s disrupting the hydration force. The adhesive force decreased with time, suggesting that the hydrophobic attraction was being screened by further surfactant adsorption. Thus the authors concluded that adsorption occurs through... 

Two important parameters, a and pf arise which depend on the equilibrium and kinetic properties of the surfactant. First, a measures the fractional change in equilibrium surface tension with a fractional change in surfactant adsorption ... 

Figure 8 reveals that the few data available for surfactant-laden bubbles do confirm the capillary-number dependence of the proposed theory in Equation 18. Careful examination of Figure 8, however, reveals that the regular perturbation analysis carried out to the linear dependence on the elasticity number is not adequate. More significant deviations are evident that cannot be predicted using only the linear term, especially for the SDBS surfactant. Clearly, more data are needed over wide ranges of capillary number and tube radius and for several more surfactant systems. Further, it will be necessary to obtain independent measurements of the surfactant properties that constitute the elasticity number before an adequate test of theory can be made. Finally, it is quite apparent that a more general solution of Equations 6 and 7 is needed, which is not restricted to small deviations of surfactant adsorption from equilibrium. 

Results and Discussion on Dynamic Adsorption Measurements. Baker dolomite was used to study the dynamic adsorption experiment. The computed porosity of the rock was 24%. One concentration below the CMC of AEGS, one at CMC, and two concentrations above CMC were chosen to measure the adsorption of this surfactant with Baker dolomite. The mass of surfactant adsorbed per gram of rock is plotted as a function of flow rate in a semi-log plot in Figure 9. 

Surface wave, 17 422. See also S-wave Surfactant adsorption, 24 119, 133-144 at the air/liquid and liquid/liquid interfaces, 24 133-138 approaches for treating, 24 134 measurement of, 24 139 at the solid/liquid interface, 24 138-144 Surfactant blends, in oil displacement efficiency, 13 628-629 Surfactant-defoamers surface tension, <5 244t Surfactant-enhanced alkaline flooding,... 

The adsorption isotherms of various surfactants were measured on minerals with a different character of Ppis. The course of the isotherms on minerals, with H and OH on one hand and those with latice ions as PDIs on the other hand, is similar, with a maximum in a region close to the CMC. Some characteristic adsorp-... 

The nonionic surfactant, nonylphenol deca(oxyethylene glycol) monoether, NP-EO10, supplied by Berol Kemi AB, Stenungsund, Sweden, was of technical grade and used without further purification. The main impurity is free polyethylene oxide. Analysis of the sample gave a polyethylene oxide content of = 3% (4). Note, that polyethylene oxide adsorbs on polystyrene latexes ( ), but a monolayer is reached at solution concentrations that are 10 times the concentration required to obtain a monolayer coverage with NP-EO q. The free polyethylene oxide, therefore, is expected to have negligible influence on the adsorption measurements. 

Methods. The adsorption was determined by adding a surfactant mixture of known composition to the emulsifier-free latex. The solid/solution ratio was held constant at 0.17 w/w. In this way a series of adsorption measurements was performed with increasing total surfactant concentration. Note that, while the ratio of the two surfactants in such a series is constant in the whole system, it is not necessarily constant on the surface or in the solution because of the preferential adsorption of one of the surfactants. 

Analysis of NP-EO- o was made by UV-spectroscopy at 275 nm where the phenyl ring gives a strong absorption. The accuracy in the determination of the adsorption of NP-EO- o is about + 0.5 mg/g. The total surfactant concentration was determined by measuring the refractive index increment on a Jena differential refractometer. These measurements give the total surfactant adsorption with an accuracy of about 1 3 tagig. The SDS concentration was obtained from the difference (total surfactant - amount of NP-EO- o) and hence is definitely not known to an accuracy better than 3 mg/g. 

Recently, surfactant adsorption and y have been measured at C02-water and C02-organic interfaces with a tandem variable-volume tensiometer (Harrison, 1996). A pendant drop of an aqueous or organic phase, saturated with C02, may be suspended in C02 or a C02-surfactant mixture and equilibrated. From the digitized droplet shape and density difference between the phases, y may be calculated from the Laplace equation. In Figure 8.1, y of the binary C02-water (da Rocha et al., 1999), -polyethylene... 

In order to achieve the above objectives, three vinyl acrylic latexes of varying butyl acrylate content have been prepared and cleaned1 for use in the study. Several anionic and nonionic surfactants commonly usod in emulsion polymerization have been used to investigate the effects of surfactant structure and polymer composition on the solubilization process. Polarity of latex surface estimated from contact angle measurements have been used to study the effect of polymer polarity on surfactant adsorption. 

Polarity of Vinyl Acrylic Latex and Surfactant Adsorption Contact angle measurements, dispersion and polar contribution to latex film surface tension and polarity of polymer calculated according to the method of Kaelble (10) of the three latex films are whown in Table V. It is seen that the polarity of the latex film decreases with increase in butyl acrylate content of the vinyl acrylic co-polymer. The polarity of the 70/30 (VA/BA) latex is very similar to that of the polybutyl acrylate homopolymer estimated to be about 0.21 (1). ... 

The polarity and adsorption data discussed above reveal some interesting aspects of the surface chemistry of vinyl acrylic latex surfaces. It is quite likely that the polarity of the latex films, expecially of the two co-polymers, determined by contact angle measurements may not correspond exactly with their respective latex surfaces in the dispersed state due to reorientation of polymer chains during film formation. But the surfactant adsorption data shows clearly that the three latex surfaces in their dispersed state do exhibit varying polarity paralleling the trend found from contact angle measurements. The result also shows that the surface of the co-polymer latex surface is a mixture of vinyl acetate and acrylate units. This result is somewhat unexpected in a vinyl acrylic latex, prepared by a batch... 

A direct determination of the adsorption density of surfactants as dependent on Na+, Ca+, and Fe3+ concentrations was performed by Dobias179). His results are shown in Fig. 17. To interpret the results of adsorption measurement, he used the Stem-Graham equation (Eq. 51). Under the assumption that Na+, Cl-, Br- and cetyltrimethylam-monium ion (the surfactant used) are not the PDI, he modified the equation to get the form... 

Adsorption can be measured by direct or indirect methods. Direct methods include surface microtome method [46], foam generation method [47] and radio-labelled surfactant adsorption method [48]. These direct methods have several disadvantages. Hence, the amount of surfactant adsorbed per unit area of interface (T) at surface saturation is mostly determined by indirect methods namely surface and interfacial tension measurements along with the application of Gibbs adsorption equations (see Section 2.2.3 and Figure 2.1). Surfactant structure, presence of electrolyte, nature of non-polar liquid and temperature significantly affect the T value. The T values and the area occupied per surfactant molecule at water-air and water-hydrocarbon interfaces for several anionic, cationic, non-ionic and amphoteric surfactants can be found in Chapter 2 of [2]. 

Ellipsometric measurements with processed photoresists showed a long-time swelling over several days. Attempts to investigate the adsorption after addition of surfactant delivered only an continued swelling. It could not be distinguished between the effects of swelling and of the surfactant adsorption. 

It can be summarized that ellipsometric measurements proved the formation of a surfactant adsorption layer on the photoresist surface. At ceg- it is assumed to form a monolayer. To get more information about the adsorption layer and its influence on the surface properties of the photoresist, an electrokinetic characterization of unexposed and processed photoresist in solutions of the cationic surfactant was carried out. The zeta potential of the photoresist layers is given in Fig. 8 as a function of the surfactant concentration. The measurement was performed at pH = 6 in a background electrolyte (KC1) concentration of 10-5 M to ensure the minimum conductivity of the solution necessary for the measurement. 

To estimate the influence of the surfactant adsorption on the capillary forces, the wetting tension yiv cos was calculated from the values given in Fig. 10a. The results drawn in Fig. 10b show for both measurement series a minimum of the capillary forces exactly at the concentration ceff. The capillary forces are reduced by about 20% compared to water. This confirms the hypothesis that the reduction of the pattern collapse is caused by a hydropho-bizing of photoresist processed with the threshold dose by cationic surfactant adsorption. Unfortunately the inverse ADS A method could not be applied at relative surfactant concentrations >0.2 since the bubbles became unstable due to the lower surface tension. Thus it cannot be estimated how the wetting tension evolves at higher concentrations. 

Although only approximate, it is sufficient to describe the thin monolayer observed in surfactant absorption, and this is the essence of the measurement of surfactant adsorption. 

The more recent neutron reflectivity studies have established that flattened surface micelle or fragmented bilayer structure in more detail and with more certainty, using contrast variation in the surfactant and the solvent [24, 31]. However, the extent of the lateral dimension (in the plane of the surface) and the detailed structure in that direction is less certain. From those neutron reflectivity measurements [24, 31] and related SANS data on the adsorption of surfactants onto colloidal particles [5], it is known that the lateral dimension is small compared with the neutron coherence length, such that averaging in the plane is adequate to describe the data. The advent of the AFM technique and its application to surfactant adsorption [15] has provided data that suggest that there is more structure and ordering in the lateral direction than implied from other measurements. This will be discussed in more detail in a later section of the chapter. At the hydrophobic interface, although the thickness of the adsorbed layer is now consistent with a monolayer, the same uncertainties about lateral structure exist. 

Much of the early studies of surfactant adsorption at the solid-solution interface were based on classical experimental techniques, such as solution depletion [1, 32], fluorescence spectroscopy [2], and measurements of the differential enthalpy of adsorption [2], Such methods have provided much of the basic initial understanding. However, they provide no direct structural information and are difficult to apply to mixtures [23, 34], However, when combined with other techniques, such as NMR and flow microcalorimetry, they provide some insight into the behaviour of mixtures. This was demonstrated by Thibaut et al. [33] on SDS/C10E5 mixtures adsorbed onto silica and by Colombie et al. [34] on the adsorption of SLS/Triton X-405 mixtures onto polystyrene particles. 

---