Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface Wilhelmy plate

Fig. ni-19. Trough for dynamic surface measurements A, stainless-steel dish B, aluminum mantle C, inlet thermostatting water D, lower PTFE bars E, oscillating bars F, attachment lower bars G, Wilhelmy plate. (From Ref. 140.)... [Pg.90]

Neumann has adapted the pendant drop experiment (see Section II-7) to measure the surface pressure of insoluble monolayers [70]. By varying the droplet volume with a motor-driven syringe, they measure the surface pressure as a function of area in both expansion and compression. In tests with octadecanol monolayers, they found excellent agreement between axisymmetric drop shape analysis and a conventional film balance. Unlike the Wilhelmy plate and film balance, the pendant drop experiment can be readily adapted to studies in a pressure cell [70]. In studies of the rate dependence of the molecular area at collapse, Neumann and co-workers found more consistent and reproducible results with the actual area at collapse rather than that determined by conventional extrapolation to zero surface pressure [71]. The collapse pressure and shape of the pressure-area isotherm change with the compression rate [72]. [Pg.114]

Before equations such as Eqs. 6, 7 and 8 can be used, values for the surface energies have to be obtained. While surface energies of liquids may be measured relatively easily by methods such as the du Nouy ring and Wilhelmy plate, those of solids present more problems. Three approaches will be briefly described. Two involve probing the solid surface with a liquid or a gas, the third relies on very sensitive measurement of the force required to separate two surfaces of defined geometry. All involve applying judicious assumptions to the experimental results. [Pg.322]

FIG. 16 Fomation of a Langmuir lipid monolayer at the air/subphase interface and the subsequent crystallization of S-layer protein, (a) Amphiphilic lipid molecules are placed on the air/subphase interface between two barriers. Upon compression between the barriers, increase in surface pressure can be determined by a Wilhelmy plate system, (b) Depending on the final area, a liquid-expanded or liquid-condensed lipid monolayer is formed, (c) S-layer subunits injected in the subphase crystallized into a coherent S-layer lattice beneath the spread lipid monolayer and the adjacent air/subphase interface. [Pg.366]

Dynamic surface tension has also been measured by quasielastic light scattering (QELS) from interfacial capillary waves [30]. It was shown that QELS gives the same result for the surface tension as the traditional Wilhelmy plate method down to the molecular area of 70 A. QELS has recently utilized in the study of adsorption dynamics of phospholipids on water-1,2-DCE, water-nitrobenzene and water-tetrachloromethane interfaces [31]. This technique is still in its infancy in liquid-liquid systems and its true power is to be shown in the near future. [Pg.539]

The sessile drop method has several drawbacks. Several days elapse between each displacement, and total test times exceeding one month are not uncommon. It can be difficult to determine that the interface has actually advanced across the face of the crystal. Displacement frequency and distance are variable and dependent upon the operator. Tests are conducted on pure mineral surfaces, usually quartz, which does not adequately model the heterogeneous rock surfaces in reservoirs. There is a need for a simple technique that gives reproducible data and can be used to characterize various mineral surfaces. The dynamic Wilhelmy plate technique has such a potential. This paper discusses the dynamic Wilhelmy plate apparatus used to study wetting properties of liquid/liquid/solid systems important to the oil industry. [Pg.560]

The Wilhelmy hanging plate method (13) has been used for many years to measure interfacial and surface tensions, but with the advent of computer data collection and computer control of dynamic test conditions, its utility has been greatly increased. The dynamic version of the Wilhelmy plate device, in which the liquid phases are in motion relative to a solid phase, has been used in several surface chemistry studies not directly related to the oil industry (14- 16). Fleureau and Dupeyrat (17) have used this technique to study the effects of an electric field on the formation of surfactants at oil/water/rock interfaces. The work presented here is concerned with reservoir wettability. [Pg.560]

This same technique should be helpful in understanding wetting properties important in the oil industry since wetting is very dependent on mineral surface energies. The use of contact angle hysteresis information may allow a better understanding of the effects of surface heterogeneities of natural mineral samples. The dynamic Wilhelmy plate technique is ideally suited for such experiments ... [Pg.571]

Table 1. Air/water/surface contact angles measured using the Wilhelmy plate method on surfaces incubated with deionised water for 10 minutes. Table 1. Air/water/surface contact angles measured using the Wilhelmy plate method on surfaces incubated with deionised water for 10 minutes.
The n-A curves were measured with a trough equipped with a moving blade and a piezoelectric device (Figure 2). Both the trough (286 mm long and 70 mm wide) and blade were coated with Teflon. The subphase temperature was kept within 0.1 °C by use of a water jacket connected with a thermostated circulation system, and the environmental air temperature was kept at 18 °C. The surface tension was measured with a Wilhelmy plate made of filter paper (25 x 25 x 0.25 mm) using a piezoelectric device. The surface pressure(ji) is defined as ... [Pg.225]

This model assumes that the air/water interface from the blade to the Wilhelmy plate can be divided into a number of equal small cells. We apply a simple argument that the rate of mass transfer by diffusion is proportional to the difference in concentration between the neighboring cells, while the concentration and the surface pressure within each cell are assumed homogeneous. [Pg.235]

The LB film depositions were performed using a Joyce-Loebl Langmuir Trough IV equipped with a microbalance for measurement of the surface pressure by the Wilhelmy plate method. Filtered deionized water with a pH of 7 was used for the subphase. For the electron beam lithography study, PMMA was spread on the water surface from a dilute benzene solution ( 10 mg PMMA in 20 ml benzene). The novolac/PAC mixtures were spread from solutions ( 20 mg solids in 10 ml solvent) of isopropyl acetate. For the fluorescence studies, the PMMA/PDA mixture was spread on fee water surface from a dilute benzene solution (1.75 mg PDA and 8.33 mg PMMA in 20 ml benzene). Prior to compression, a 20 min interval was allowed for solvent evaporation. The Langmuir film was compressed to the desired transfer pressure at a rate of 50 cm2/min, followed by a 20 minute equilibration period. The Cr-coated silicon wafers and quartz wafers were immersed into fee subphase before... [Pg.351]

The Wilhelmy plate method provides an extremely simple approach that, unlike the ring detachment method, permits the measurement of continuously varying or dynamic surface tensions. If a thin plate (e.g., a microscope slide, a strip of platinum foil, or even a slip of filter paper) is attached to a microbalance and suspended so that its lower edge is just immersed in a liquid, the measured apparent weight Wj, is related to the actual weight of the plate Wp and the surface tension y by the following simple equation ... [Pg.208]

Figure 4. Automatic dynamic surface tension balance showing Wilhelmy plate suspended in surface. Photograph supplied by Cahn Instruments, Inc. Figure 4. Automatic dynamic surface tension balance showing Wilhelmy plate suspended in surface. Photograph supplied by Cahn Instruments, Inc.
If one considers a system consisting of water (with or without added electrolyte) + oil + surfactant (with or without a cosurfactant) at equilibrium, there will most likely be present more than two phases (due to the formation of emulsion or microemulsion). The determination of the interfacial tension, Yij> between the two liquid phases is, therefore, of much importance, in order to understand the forces which stabilize these emulsions or microemulsions. The interfacial tension can be measured by using a variety of methods, as described in detail in surface chemistry text-books (1-3). If the magnitude of yij is of the order of few mN/m (=dyne/ cm), then the methods generally used are Wilhelmy plate method or the drop volume (or weight) method (1-4). However, in certain systems ultra-low (or low) interfacial tensions have been reported. Since these low values are reported to be essential in order to mo-... [Pg.329]

The most useful method of measuring surface tension is by the well-known Wilhelmy plate method. If a plate-shaped metal is dipped in a liquid, the surface tension forces will be found to produce a tangential force (Figure 2.13). This is because a new contact phase is created between the plate and the liquid. [Pg.27]

The Wilhelmy plate is placed at the surface of the water, and the oil phase is added until the whole plate is covered by the latter. The apparatus must be calibrated with known IFT data such as water-hexadecane (52 mN/m 25°C) (Table 2.4). [Pg.37]

Monolayer films were studied by using a Teflon trough with a barrier (also of Teflon) that could move across the surface (Figure 4.1). The change in y was monitored using a Wilhelmy plate attached to a sensor. The accuracy could be as high as mmN/m (m dyne/cm). [Pg.71]

Another common method used to measure the surface tension of liquids is called the Wilhelmy plate . These methods use the force (or... [Pg.25]

Figure 2.14 Diagram of the Wilhelmy plate method for measuring the surface tension of liquids. Figure 2.14 Diagram of the Wilhelmy plate method for measuring the surface tension of liquids.
The surface tension measurement was done at 25 C by a modified Wilhelmy plate method(Shimadzu ST-1). [Pg.62]

The situation shown in Figure 6.2b is one in which surface tension and contact angle considerations pull a liquid upward in opposition to gravity. A mass of liquid is drawn up as if it were suspended by the surface from the supporting walls. At equilibrium the upward pull of the surface and the downward pull of gravity on the elevated mass must balance. This elementary statement of force balance applies to two techniques by which 7 can be measured if 6 is known the Wilhelmy plate and capillary rise. [Pg.253]

FIG. 6.3 Surface tension and capillary rise (a) the Wilhelmy plate method for measuring 7 (b) schematic illustration of capillary rise in a cylindrical tube of radius Rc. [Pg.253]

Strictly speaking, Equation (2) allows the vertical component of surface tension to be measured. Since this equals 7 cos 0, we are actually making a single measurement that involves two parameters. If 7 were independently known, the Wilhelmy plate method could also be used to determine 0. Whether we seek to evaluate 7, 0, or both, two experiments are needed, and these may not both involve the factor cos 0. In Section 6.8a we discuss a second type of measurement that can be made with the Wilhelmy apparatus that supplies a complementary observation so both 7 and 0 can be determined on a single instrument. [Pg.254]

We saw in Section 6.2 that the Wilhelmy plate offers an accurate method for measuring 7 cos 6. We thus have one experiment with two unknowns. The Wilhelmy balance measures the weight of the meniscus in this section we examine the height to which the meniscus climbs on the same surface. We shall see that this distance — which may be accurately measured with a traveling microscope or cathetometer — also depends on 7 and 6. The functional relationship between these parameters and the experimental variables is different from the case of the meniscus weight. Therefore we have two experiments with two unknowns that can be solved for 7 and 6. [Pg.276]

Next, an experiment such as that shown in Figure 7.2b could be conducted. The apparatus consists of a pair of Wilhelmy plates attached to two arms of a balance. One plate contacts the clean surface and the other the surface with the monolayer. Note that the barrier separates the two portions of surface. The surface tension will be different in the two regions, and the weight (and volume) of the meniscus entrained by the plate will be larger for the clean surface... [Pg.302]

FIG. 7.2 Schematic illustrations of a monolayer and a Wilhelmy plate arrangement for surface tension measurement (a) schematic illustration of a barrier delineating the area of a monolayer and (b) a Wilhelmy plate arrangement for measuring the difference in 7 on opposite sides of barrier. [Pg.303]


See other pages where Surface Wilhelmy plate is mentioned: [Pg.115]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.2581]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.573]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.302]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.63 ]




SEARCH



Surface force Wilhelmy plate method

Surface tension Wilhelmy plate method

Surface tension Wilhelmy plate technique

Surfaces plates

Wilhelmy

Wilhelmy plate

Wilhelmy plate technique, surface tension measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info