Surface waves control

This report presents the results of investigations aimed at the creation of the surface wave transducer for the automated control. The basic attention is drawn to the analysis of the position of the front meniscus of the contact liquid when the surface waves excite through the slot gap and to the development of system for acoustic contact creation. 

Owing to the presence of surface waves upon reoxidation, anodic peak potentials are reported. Controlled potential electrolysis used to generate Ceo due to insolubility of Ceo in MeCN. 

SLM) imaged onto the sample surface in order to generate SAWs, the frequency and wavefront of which are controlled by the SLM. When the grating period matches the surface acoustic wavelength, the surface wave is strongly excited, so the wavelength, and hence the phase velocity, can be readily determined [38]. 

A quarter wave structure is used here to spread the particles across the width of the chamber, and the pressure profile is shown in the diagram. This requires the whole particle population to be input at the bottom of the channel, requiring some preconditioning of the particle distribution before the particles are introduced to this device. If the residence time in the field is too long though, all the particles will end up at the top surface. Frequency controlled fractionators can overcome this by switching between several frequencies to introduce varying resonance conditions within... 

We also indicated that this type of surface wave could be controlled in various ways. One approach is to load each element resistively. If used as an FSS, the resistors should have a low value in order not to significantly attenuate the reflected signal. In case of phased arrays a resistive loading could be obtained by simply feeding the elements from constant voltage generators with realistic generator impedances. 

However, perhaps the most noteworthy is that in spite of the fact that one of the surface waves has a peak exceeding that of the Hoquet currents peak by about 5dB, the highest value of the scattering pattern is almost 20 dB below the peak of the Floquet pattern. In other words, the radiation efficiency of the surface waves is considerably lower than that of the Floquet currents. Or we may alternatively state that the radiation resistances associated with the surface waves are considerably lower than the one associated with the Floquet mode. Inspection of Fig. 4.5e shows this statement to be correct. This observation will later prove crucial when we try to control the radiation from the surface waves without significantly attenuating the one from the Floquet mode. 

We saw earlier that surface waves radiate and can lead to a significant increase in the backscattered field. It is therefore of great interest to investigate ways to control them. We recall from Fig. 4.5d as well as Fig. 4.12 that the surface waves basically were driven by two semi-infinite arrays located on each side of the finite array. Thus, if we could somehow introduce a barrier between the two semiinfinite arrays and the finite array, we would expect a weaker excitation of the surface waves in the finite array. One such possible practical arrangement could consist of a finite number of columns between the semi-infinite and finite arrays where the column currents had been reduced by insertion of load resistors in each element. Such an arrangement could also serve as absorbers of the two surface waves as well as the Floquet waves incident upon the edges of the finite array. 

CONTROLLING SURFACE WAVES ON FINITE ARRAYS OF ACTIVE ELEMENTS WITH FSS GROUNDPLANE... 

Furthermore, one more component will complicate the situation, namely the groundplane that in our investigation is modeled in the form of a finite FSS surface. Potential surface waves on such a structure cannot be attenuated by simple resistive loading all the elements across the entire surface since such an approach would lead to excessive reflection loss as a groundplane. Thus, possible surface waves must in this case be controlled in the same manner as was done in Chapter 4, namely by resistively loading just a few columns in the edge areas. 

However, in cases where we are working with FSS s, the element loads, if there are any, will in general be entirely reactive that is, no attenuation of a potential surface wave will take place. Nor is it a good idea to place even small resistors in each element since that would lead to reflection and transmission loss of the principal mode. In that case only a small number of edge columns should be resistively loaded. This is not as effective a way to control surface waves as resistors placed in each element, but then again FSS s are more forgiving in that respect than are the active arrays. 

A major technical hurdle anticipated in tlie ultrasonic system development did not materialize when surface wave imaging was successfully applied to inspect cylindrical tensile rods (6-mm in diameter). A novel rotational stage was incorporated in the prototype specimen manipulator. Software for manipulator control, data acquisition, and image reconstruction was developed concurrently. The technical requirements included ... 

Whilst the mouse is the preferred control option of many personal computer users, touch-screens are increasingly being used in industrial and other applications including hospital patient care systems, gaming machines and computer installations in post offices and restaurants. The various control technologies are resistive, surface wave, projected and surface capacitance, and infrared. However, not all the systems invariably involve the use of polymers. Those which do include the resistive system whereby a clear acrylic, PC or glass substrate is attached to a second flexible polyester layer. 

---