Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface pressure dynamic behavior

The above studies show that the chemisorptions on metals could often alter the composition and structure of metal surfaces. To bridge the pressure gap, in situ STM has played a critical role in observing the dynamic behavior of catalytic surfaces from UHV to atmospheric pressures. [Pg.81]

The rheological properties of a fluid interface may be characterized by four parameters surface shear viscosity and elasticity, and surface dilational viscosity and elasticity. When polymer monolayers are present at such interfaces, viscoelastic behavior has been observed (1,2), but theoretical progress has been slow. The adsorption of amphiphilic polymers at the interface in liquid emulsions stabilizes the particles mainly through osmotic pressure developed upon close approach. This has become known as steric stabilization (3,4.5). In this paper, the dynamic behavior of amphiphilic, hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl celluloses (HM-HEC), was studied. In previous studies HM-HEC s were found to greatly reduce liquid/liquid interfacial tensions even at very low polymer concentrations, and were extremely effective emulsifiers for organic liquids in water (6). [Pg.185]

Contrary to the accumulated knowledge on the static or quasi-static characteristics of thin lipid films at air/water interface, less attention has been paid to the dynamical or nonequilibrium behavior of the film. Studies on the dynamical characteristics of thin lipid films may be quite important, because the life phenomena are maintained under nonequilibrium conditions. According to the modern biochemistry [11,12], thin lipid membrane in living cells is not a rigid wall but a thermally fluctuating barrier with high fluidity. In the present section, we will show that thin lipid film exhibits the various interesting dynamical tc-A characteristics, such as the "overshoot hump", the "zero surface pressure", and the "flat plateau". [Pg.223]

From such microbubble-dissolution measurements, Bemd (ref. 16,17) outlined a physical model to explain much of the dynamic behavior of film-stabilized microbubbles.- One problematic aspect of this dynamic behavior involved the question of how a gas nucleus can be surrounded by a relatively impermeable film and yet subsequently act to produce cavitation when a gas/water interface is needed to initiate cavitation. Bernd (ref. 16) explains that if the stabilized gas microbubble enters a low-pressure area, the gas within the microbubble will attempt to expand. The surfactant film may also elastically attempt to expand. The surfactant film will then be expanded until essentially the surface tension of the water alone acts to contract the microbubble, since the protective shell no longer acts. The film has either been ruptured upon expansion, or it has expanded until it is ineffectual. Thus the microbubble (i.e., gas nucleus) should be capable of expanding to form a cavitation void or acquire additional gas in the form of water vapor or from surrounding dissolved gas. In addition, Bernd points out that it is reasonable to expect a gas microbubble to acquire such an effective... [Pg.21]

A dynamic technique is described for obtaining surface elasticity (e0) vs. surface pressure (tt) curves which can be transformed into accurate tt—A curves for soluble monolayers. Small amplitude periodic area variations are used with a sufficiently high frequency to make monolayers effectively insoluble in the time of the experiment even though they behave as soluble in equilibrium measurements. plots are given for some nonionic surfactants. Straight line portions in these plots illustrate that surface interactions are too complex to be described by a Frumkin isotherm. In the limit of very low surface pressures there is no trace of an ideal gaseous region. Some examples show the implications of particular e0—rr curves for equilibrium and dynamic surface behavior. [Pg.281]

Elementary steps and their dynamic behavior have been observed on surfaces of a wide variety of crystals. However, no one has so far succeeded in directly visualizing growing elementary steps of ice crystals, besides our recent works [16, 19]. The difficulty in visualization is mainly due to (i) the small height of elementary steps of ice crystals, (ii) high equilibrium vapor pressure of ice, and (iii) QLLs that appear on ice crystal surfaces at temperatures near the melting point... [Pg.312]

Recently, Vigil and Willmore [67] have reported mean field and lattice gas studies of the oscillatory dynamics of a variant of the ZGB model. In this example oscillations are also introduced, allowing the reversible adsorption of inert species. Furthermore, Sander and Ghaisas [69] have very recently reported simulations for the oxidation of CO on Pt in the presence of two forms of oxygen, namely chemisorbed atomic O and oxidized metal surface. These species, which are expected to be present for reaction under atmospheric pressure, are relevant for the onset of oscillatory behavior [69]. [Pg.406]

Such quenching behavior suggests that dynamic quenching, whereby quencher molecules interact with the emitting sites in their excited state to give nonradiative deactivation pathways, is the principal cause of the quenching that occurs with butenes. As a result, the quenching efficiency depends on the amount of surface quencher molecules and in turn on the equilibrium pressure of the added molecules 33, 34). [Pg.229]

Our ultimate goal is the simulation of alloys and their behavior under conditions of elevated temperature. Accordingly, empirical multibody potentials present an attractive combination of physical accuracy and computational efficiency. To facilitate simulation under the widest possible variety of conditions of temperature, pressure, and surface tension, we decided to incorporate a multibody potential function for copper into a widely used, commercially available molecular dynamics program. We chose CHARMM [35], because of its widespread use, constant pressure/ temperature/surface tension capabilities, and reliability. [Pg.705]


See other pages where Surface pressure dynamic behavior is mentioned: [Pg.196]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.3086]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.770]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.936]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.1295]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.718]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.937]   


SEARCH



Dynamic behavior

Dynamic pressurization

Surface behavior

Surface pressure

© 2024 chempedia.info