Nonradiative deactivations

Figure 11-10. The nonradiative deactivation paths for the lowest two 1 it it state and the state of...

As a preliminary test of equations 1-3, we calculated the values of required to explain the observed nonradiative deactivation rates for 0s(phen)3 " and 0s(bpy)3 at 4.2 K.1 The resulting values, respectively, 0.29 and 0.33 are in good agreement with the value of 0.29 calculated by Byrne et al. for skeletal stretching modes in large aromatic molecules. 

Fig. 10 Energy level diagram showing the excited states involved in the main photophysical processes (excitation solid lines radiative deactivation dashed lines, nonradiative deactivation processes wavy lines) of the 2 Nd3+ [Ru(bpy)2(CN)2] three-component system. For the sake of clarity, naphthyl excimer energy level has been omitted...

The quantum yields in the amorphous state are low, and much lower than in the crystalline state, presumably because of the larger molecular degrees of freedom that favor nonradiative deactivation pathways. Naito et al. [109] reported quantum yields for different oxadiazoles in amorphous films, ranging from 2% for 17a and 29 to 16% for a methoxy-substituted starburst oxadiazole. For 17b, the quantum 17b yield in the amorphous him is still one-third of the value in the crystalline form (10 vs. 30%). 

At present it is universally acknowledged that TTA as triplet-triplet energy transfer is caused by exchange interaction of electrons in bimolecular complexes which takes place during molecular diffusion encounters in solution (in gas phase -molecular collisions are examined in crystals - triplet exciton diffusion is the responsible annihilation process (8-10)). No doubt, interaction of molecular partners in a diffusion complex may lead to the change of probabilities of fluorescent state radiative and nonradiative deactivation. Nevertheless, it is normally considered that as a result of TTA the energy of two triplet partners is accumulated in one molecule which emits the ADF (11). Interaction with the second deactivated partner is not taken into account, i.e. it is assumed that the ADF is of monomer nature and its spectrum coincides with the PF spectrum. Apparently the latter may be true when the ADF takes place from Si state the lifetime of which ( Tst 10-8 - 10-9 s) is much longer than the lifetime of diffusion encounter complex ( 10-10 - lO-H s in liquid solutions). As a matter of fact we have not observed considerable ADF and PF spectral difference when Sj metal lo-... 

Because of the fast nonradiative deactivation of low lying energy states of transition metal complexes, the activation energy for the reactions that may occur from these states must be zero to enable them to compete effectively. For transition metal complexes both 4T2S and aEs states can be photochemically active but may follow different chemical pathways. 

Photophysical processes, that is, ones not involving any change in composition of an A, have become of much interest to the inorganic photochemist, particularly in terms of excited state kinetic schemes. A brief discussion of the phenomenology and theory of radiative and nonradiative deactivations follows. 

Nitrogen trioxide in atmospheric reactions, 122 rranr-2-butene with, 122 nitrogen pentoxide as source of, 122 oxidation of alkenes by, 122 tetramethyl ethylene (TME) with, 124 Nonequilibrated excited rotamers (NEER), 141 Nonradiative deactivation of Pr and Pfr, 242... 

One solution to the problem of semiconductor photodecomposition is to modify the spectral response of a stable wide-band-gap semiconductor so that solar energy can be efficiently utilized. This can be accomplished by adding to the electrolyte a dye that has absorption features that overlap the solar spectrum. The short excited-state lifetimes of molecular systems limit the distance an excited state can be expected to diffuse prior to nonradiative deactivation. Thus,... 

The process of the nonradiating deactivation in the matrix competes with the nonradiating energy transfer process for the activation energy of an excited molecule in the matrix. With increasing temperature the decision is made for the nonradiating deactivation of the polystyrene molecules (9). 

Marginal fluorescence quantum yields (1%) are generally observed though 25 and 33 fluorescence with 8% and 14% yields, respectively. Such low quantum yields are indicative of the effective competition of radiationless processes such as the Si —> Tj ISC and fast internal conversion (Si —> S0). The rate constants for radiative decay of Si (kF) range from 8 x 106 to 1.3 x 108 s-1, and the nonradiative decay rate constants (fcNR) range from 1.9 x 108 to 3.5 x 109 s / The nonradiative deactivation pathway is thus six times faster than the radiative one for 33 (anti) and about 110 times faster for 32 (syn). 

The temperature dependent term describes the transfer of CT energy to d-d excited states and constitutes an additional nonradiative deactivation pathway. (See Fig. 2.) Caspar and Meyer185 calculated Ea for [Ru(bpy)3]2+ to be 3560 cm 1 supporting Van Houten and Watts original estimate of ca. 3600 cm 1174. ... 

Deactivation processes competing with fluorescence are mainly nonradiative deactivation to the S0 state (IC) and nonradiative transition to a triplet state (intersystem crossing, ISC). Photochemical products are often formed from this triplet state. Important photochemical reactions are the E—yZ isomerization of ethylene, the oxidation of pyrazoline to pyrazole, and the dimerization of cou-marins. 

Recently, the effect of the donor-acceptor separation has been studied.76 Both the fluorescence lifetime and quantum yield were found to decrease as the distance between the two porphyrins—Cmeso-Cmeso (cd) and CCmeso-CCmeso (ab)—decreases (Fig. 24). As the two rings get closer to each other, they interact more strongly, and hence nonradiative deactivation becomes more pronounced.75,76... 

Although the existence of the M.I.R. may have appeared counter-intuitive to many chemists, photophysicists had a different point of view, since an inverted" relationship of the rate constant of nonradiative transitions and the energy difference between the states is well established [91]. This energy gap law results from the decreasing vibrational overlap of electronic states, the so-called Franck-Condon factor. It predicts an exponential relationship of the rate constant of nonradiative deactivation of excited states with the energy gap, of the form ... 

Fig. 8. Transitions of interest for Erin and its sensitizers. Internal nonradiative deactivations are not shown for clarity. Dotted arrows represent up-conversion processes. Adapted from (Le Quang et al., 2005).

---