Homogeneous surfaces

Fig. 7.5. Nucleation in solids. Heterogeneous nucleotion con take place at defects like dislocations, grain boundaries, interphase interfaces and free surfaces. Homogeneous nucleation, in defect-free regions, is rare.

The friction coefficient is expected to depend on the normal pressure which is quite high (of order hundreds of kilobars) surface roughness surface homogeneity and humidity (or other environmental factors). As a result, a is not known, so a quantitative model is not possible, but the expected qualitative behavior is clear. 

Figures la and lb are typical curves found for the heat of immersion of polar solids in water (and are also foimd for polar and nonpolar solids in organic liquids). An example of Fig. la is found in the immersion of chrysotile asbestos having known and increasing amounts of physically adsorbed water on its surface (S ). The linear relationship between the heat of wetting and the volume adsorbed up to about a monolayer is significant and indicates surface homogeneity since the heat evolved is proportional to the amount of bare surface present. In accord with this finding, the isosteric heat values calculated from adsorption isotherms increased with coverage to a maximum near the monolayer as expected for adsorption on a surface possessing nearly uniform sites.

Few such techniques are applicable in the case of trace gas exchange instead, micrometeorological methods have risen in popularity. In concept, such methods evaluate the flux across a plane above the surface rather than the deposition at the surface itself. Considerable care is necessary to ensure that the flux evaluated above the surface is the same as that at the surface. This constraint is the reason for the widely acknowledged micrometeorological requirements for uniform conditions, surface homogeneity, and terrain simplicity. The most common micrometeorological methods are eddy-correlation and the interpretation of gradients (2). Of these... 

Many of the disadvantages of ram extrusion are eliminated in hydrostatic extruaon, where the piston is replaced by high pressure fluid. As shown in Fig. 15, the billet stands clear of the cylinder walls, so that this element of friction is eliminated. The pressure transmitting fluid also lubricates the interface between the die and the billet, so that the deformation is essentially plug-flow (i.e. an extensional deformation, identical to drawing polymer with a free surface). Homogeneous oriented sections are therefore produced. A small haul-off force is applied to provide control of the extrusion process, and this also serves to ensure that the extrudates are straight. 

Before looking at the reconstituted membranes in more detail, we shall first discuss a simpler question concerning the distribution of ions in the aqueous phase of bilayer structures. Is the ion distribution in the water phase of typically 15 A width between the lipid surfaces homogenous, or is there a preferential binding to the polar head groups of the lipids These studies have been started in collaboration with G. Biildt and some preliminary results from dipalmitoyl phosphatidyl cholin (DPPC) membranes will be reported here. ... 

Equation [1.5.38] is still fairly general. Except for the premises of localization, surface homogeneity and absence of lateral interaction, we only have the restriction that at given J there is only one type of subsystem, l.e. only one q(J). This generality implies that, for instance, [1.5.38] also applies to the three-dimensional analogue, like water sorption on a non-expanding gel. Furthermore, a number of models are compatible with this expression. 

Equations of this type appear to fit Isotherms of type II (fig. 1.13) quite well, sometimes better than BET theory does. The exponent -1/3 stems from 11.5.51). In practice, values between -1/3 and -1/2 are usually found. From the viewpoint of dispersion forces this is difficult to account for. Retardation does not play a role and. even if it did, this would further reduce the exponent. Rather, the sum effect of all "hand-waving" approximations (including the assumption of surface homogeneity) leads to a semi-empirical Isotherm of the form j 1.5.54] in which the constants and exponent are, within certain limits, adjustable. Because of this, the equation is often written in the more general form... 

The matter discussed in sec. 2.3 concerned the phenomenology of adsorption from solution. To make further progress, model assumptions have to be made to arrive at isotherm equations for the individual components. These assumptions are similar to those for gas adsorption secs. 1.4-1.7) and Include issues such as is the adsorption mono- or multlmolecular. localized or mobile is the surface homogeneous or heterogeneous, porous or non-porous is the adsorbate ideal or non-ideal and is the molecular cross-section constant over the entire composition range In addition to all of this the solution can be ideal or nonideal, the molecules may be monomers or oligomers and their interactions simple (as in liquid krypton) or strongly associative (as in water). 

I) then a steep, almost vertical, rise Just below the c.m.c. (regime 11). The final, slower Increase in 111 would, on a linear plot, almost look like a plateau. Other Investigators have essentially confirmed these three regimes, with certain modifications. In isotherms reported In the literature, data In region 1 are not always available and the rise in 11 may be less steep, depending on the natures of surfactant and surface, including surfactant heterodlsperslty and surface homogeneity, respectively. 

J. P. Coulomb, Original Properties of Thin Adsorbed Films on an Ionic Surface of Square Symmetry and High Surface Homogeneity MgO (100) in Phase Transitions in Surface Films 2, ed. H. Taub, G. Torzo, H. J. Lauter and S. C. Fain, Jr., NATO ASI 267, Plenum Press, New York (1991), 113-134. 

Here, K denotes the r.h.s. of Eq. (79) and A = Uo/kT is an heterogeneity factor which increases with increasing heterogeneity of the adsorbing surface. Homogeneous surfaces correspond to A = 0. At patchwise surfaces Eq. (80) should be solved numerically with respect to 0, and the total adsorption isotherm is determined again numerically from Eqs. (81) and (82). 

---