Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface diffusion nature

The reaction was studied for all coinage metal nanoparticles. In the case of GMEs the rate follows zero-order kinetics with IT for all the coinage metal cases. The observed IT for the Cu catalyzed reaction was maximum but its rate of reduction was found to be minimum. Just the reverse was the case for Au and an intermediate value was obtained for the Ag catalyzed reaction (Figure 7). The adsorption of substrates is driven by chemical interaction between the particle surface and the substrates. Here phe-nolate ions get adsorbed onto the particle surface when present in the aqueous medium. This caused a blue shift of the plasmon band. A strong nucleophile such as NaBH4, because of its diffusive nature and high electron injection capability, transfers electrons to the substrate via metal particles. This helps to overcome the kinetic barrier of the reaction. [Pg.424]

The interfacial zone is by definition the region between the crystallite basal surface and the beginning of isotropy. Due to the conformationally diffuse nature of this region, quantitative contents of the interphase are most often determined by indirect measures. For example, they have been computed as a balance from one of the sum of the fractional contents of pure crystalline and amorphous regions. The analysis of the internal modes region of the Raman spectrum of polyethylene, as detailed in the previous section of this chapter, was used to quantify the content of the interphase region (ab). [Pg.271]

One of the authors (MH) showed that the formation of an ECSC or an FCC is related to the order of the crystalline phase [20,33,34], that is, an ECSC and an FCC are formed from the melt into a disordered hexagonal and an ordered orthorhombic phase, respectively. It is natural to consider that the surface diffusion process should be controlled by the order of the crystalline phase. This is the reason why H shows a significant difference between ECSC and FCC. [Pg.171]

It should be noted that the critical nucleation process does not depend on M. This can be explained by our model of surface diffusion (Fig. 27). In the model a nucleus will be formed from the absorbed chains. We can estimate the number of repeating units within a critical nucleus (N ) using parameters a, ae, and Ah given in [14]. N is the order of 102-103 for the range of AT in our experiment, which is much smaller than the number of repeating units within a molecule (103-104). This indicates that a critical nucleus should be formed by a part of a molecular chain. Therefore, the nucleation process of the critical nucleus will not depend on M. Thus, it is a natural result that B does not depend on M in this study. This is consistent with the discussion by Hoffman et al. [28] on FCC. They showed that the nucleation process of an FCC does not depend on Mn in the case of Mn > 104. On the contrary they showed that it depends on Mn for Mn < 104, because ae depends on Mn due to the effect of chain ends on the end surface of the critical nucleus. [Pg.171]

The intermediates generated at the surface diffuse into the bulk solution. Owing to their high reactivity, the intermediates react in a fairly thin reaction layer that adheres to the electrode, and thus their concentration is higher than in homogeneous reactions where they spread uniformly over the medium. This can influence the nature of the product and its distribution. [Pg.95]

Several similar experiments of scratch healing on polycrystalline Au had been published by Geguzin et al. [33,34]. They noted that the healing rate depended on the orientation of the imposed scratch relative to the "natural roughness steps" of the surface. When surface diffusion was mainly perpendicular to these, a substantial retardation was observed. In a later paper [34] the azimuthal dependence was measured and a plot similar to that in Fig. 2 was shown. Since the "natural roughness steps" may well have the same... [Pg.47]

The amount of adsorption is limited by the available surface and pore volume, and depends also on the chemical natures of the fluid and solid. The rate of adsorption also depends on the amount of exposed surface but, in addition, on the rate of diffusion to the external surface and through the pores of the solid for accessing the internal surface which comprises the bulk of the surface. Diffusion rates depend on temperature and differences in concentration or partial pressures. The smaller the particle size, the greater is the utilization of the internal surface, but also the greater the pressure drop for flow of bulk fluid through a mass of the particles. [Pg.495]

D. Effect of Buffer Cation and Buffer Anion The electroosmotic flow is proportional to the potential drop across the diffuse layer of counterions associated with the capillary wall. Because the potential drop is formed by counterions in the buffer attracted to the charged silica surface, the nature of the counterions will affect the zeta potential and therefore the EOF. Figure 4.5 shows the effect of the buffer cation on the mobility of both the EOF (using mesityl oxide as the marker) and a solute (dansylalanine).16 The highest mobility is obtained with the smallest cations however, high mobility may decrease solute resolution, so care must be taken in choosing the cation. The buffer anion also affects the mobility of the EOF, although trends are less apparent. Therefore, the effect of the EOF on a separation can be altered by careful selection of both the buffer anion and cation. [Pg.141]

Catalyst selection involves two features productivity and selectivity. The process rate is a subtle combination of four limiting steps adsorption/desorption of reac-tants/product, surface reaction between species, diffusion through pores and diffusion through external film. Pore structure, surface area, nature and distribution of active sites play a crucial role in forming the process rate at the level of catalyst... [Pg.46]

Table V shows the results for oxygen. The adsorption or permeation process is apparently very strongly affected by the pressure used in pretreating the tube with oxygen. The apparent leak rate is roughly proportional to the square root of the pressure. One explanation of this law may be that the adsorption or surface diffusion of the gas is atomic in nature. Table V shows the results for oxygen. The adsorption or permeation process is apparently very strongly affected by the pressure used in pretreating the tube with oxygen. The apparent leak rate is roughly proportional to the square root of the pressure. One explanation of this law may be that the adsorption or surface diffusion of the gas is atomic in nature.
So how can one handle situations where the steps are far apart One answer lies in the pioneering work of Burton et al. (1951), also known as the BCF model. The BCF model is a continuum PDE that describes adsorption of atoms to and desorption from terraces along with surface diffusion on terraces [see Eq. (2) below for a simplified version of the BCF model]. When the concentration of adatoms is relatively large, nucleation between distant steps is most likely to occur, because the probability of a diffusing adatom to reach steps before encountering another adatom is low. Under these conditions, the BCF model is inadequate since it does not account for nucleation. Furthermore, the boundary conditions in the BCF model ignore the discrete nature of steps and treat them... [Pg.21]

Governed by the nature of the surface species, diffusion may be categorized as diffusion of physically adsorbed molecules and of chemisorbed species, and self-diffusion. The latter refers to the diffusion of atoms, ions, and clusters on the surface of their own crystal lattices and has been studied mostly for metals. All three categories of surface diffusion are of importance in catalysis. A review concerning all categories is available [20]. [Pg.47]

The next question is how the migration process of oxygen into the snbsnrfaee may be altered by the presence of other metals. We fonnd that depending on the nature of the element added to pure Pt, transition metals (Co, Ni, Ru, Rh, Pd, and Ir) can influence the magnitndes of the O surface diffusion, absorption, and reverse... [Pg.389]

To localize the RGD residues on the Ad penton base, a cryo-EM reconstruction was performed of adenovirus type 2 (Ad2) complexed with an RGD-specific Eab fragment from an mAb directed against the penton base (Stewart et al, 1997). This structural analysis revealed that the RGD regions are at the top of protrusions on the pentameric penton base protein. In addition, it was deduced from the diffuse nature of the Fab density that the RGD residues were in a structurally variable surface loop. Comparison of the knovra sequences of the penton base protein from various adenovirus serotypes suggested that type 12 adenovirus (Adl2) would have the least structurally variable RGD loop, as Ad 12 has 45 fewer residues in the variable region flanking the conserved RGD residues than are found in Ad2 (Chiu et al, 1999). [Pg.479]

Thus Eq. (4-13) implies that Knudsen diffusion is practical only when those gases with large differences in their molecular weights are to be separated. For applications where this mechanism poses as a severe limitation, other more effective separation mechanisms would be necessary. Two such possibilities are surface diffusion (and multi-layer diffusion) and capillary condensation, both of which are dependent on the chemical nature of both the membrane material and pore size and the species to be separated. [Pg.125]


See other pages where Surface diffusion nature is mentioned: [Pg.560]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.818]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.683]    [Pg.203]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.401 , Pg.419 ]




SEARCH



Diffuse surface

Diffusion nature

Non-equilibrium surface forces of diffusion-electrical nature in

Surface diffusion

Surface diffusion Diffusivity

Surface diffusivity

Surface nature

© 2024 chempedia.info