Surface characterization, nanostructured

In this chapter, attention is focused on in-situ STM and AFM, and recent advances of in-situ SPM in surface electrochemistry and nanoelectrochemistry are introduced, with applications that include surface characterization, nanostructuring, and molecular electronics. First, a brief discussion of the principles and features of STM and AFM is provided, and this is followed by some selected examples of the capabilities of both techniques in the study of surface and nanoelectrochemistry, mostly acquired in recent studies conducted by the present author s group. Emphasis is placed on the roles of in-situ STM and AFM from a methodological point of view. Finally, the prospects for the further development of in-situ SPM are reviewed. 

Characterization of the surface impurities on the catalyst is also essential, and photoreactivity data should be analyzed in terms of active and accessible surface area. The defect state of the surface and nanostructure are also important aspects to understand. Current advances in the synthesis allow preparing Titania or titanate nanorods with different diameter and aspect ratio, and different surface nanostructure as well. Limiting the discussion here to only preparations by hydrothermal treatment (for reasons of conciseness), various mechanisms of growing of the nanorods has been reported. The differences in the mechanism of formation would imply differences in the surface characteristics of the nanorods, but there is no literature available on this topic. 

In nanosized particle film electrodes, photogenerated holes can be rapidly transferred to the semiconductor/electrolyte interface and there be captured by the redox species in the electrolyte. In this way, the recombination losses can be diminished. This is of great importance for semiconductors like hematite with a very short hole diffusion length (2-4 nm). Another advantage is the large internal surface area, which characterize nanostructured semiconductor film electrodes. The latter decreases the current density per unit area of semiconductor / electrolyte interface. 

Application of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy to Nanostructured Materials Surface Characterization... 

As a conclusion to this study, it must be kept in mind that all the properties involving the surface of nanostructured powders require a specific characterization and a thorough understanding of the first atomic layer. 

We would like to thank Dr. Komber for the NMR analysis. Dr. GrafstrOm for XPS measurements, as well as Dr. K.-J. Eichhom and Dr. K. Grundke for help with the surface characterization techniques. Financial support by the DFG (Forschergruppe "Nanostructured functional elements in macroscopic systems ) is gratefully acknowledged. 

Okubo T., Nagamoto H. Low temperature preparation of nanostructured zirconia and YSZ by sol-gel processing. J. Mater. Sci. 1995 30 749-757 Okubo T., Takahashi T., Sadakata M., Nagamoto H. Crack-free porous YSZ membrane via controlled synthesis of zirconia sol. J. Membr. Sci. 1996 118 151-157 Palinko L, Torok B., Surya Prakash G.K., Olah G.A. Surface characterization of variously treated Nafion-H, Nafion-H supported on silica and Nafion-H silica nanocomposite catalysts by infrared microscopy. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1998 174 147-153 Schmidt H., Wolter H. Organically modified ceramics and their applications. J. Non-Cryst. SoUds 1990 121 428 35... 

Pig. 10.13 Future directions of hot electron studies, including (a) development of hybrid nanoparticle-nanodiode systems, and (b) in situ surface characterization. The cartoon depicts the conductive atomic force microscopy experiments on Au/liOj nanostructures under exothermic catalytic reactions or photon irradiation... 

Section 7.3 will describe tools we developed to synthesize and characterize soft dendritic nanostructured TPE biomaterials via living carbocationic polymerization, and decorate their surfaces with tissue-friendly groups. 

In conclusion, nanorods are a potentially interesting material, but present results still do not allow understanding of whether the nanostructure leads to an improvement of the intrinsic photocatalytic behaviour, or whether other factors (accessible surface area, enhanced adsorption, etc) are responsible for the observed differences. In ZnO nanorods have been shown quite recently by surface photovoltage spectroscopy that the built-in electrical field is the main driving force for the separation of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs.191 This indicates that the nano-order influences the photophysical surface processes after photogeneration of the electron-hole pairs. A similar effect could be expected for Titania nanorods. However, present data do not support this suggestion, mainly due to the absence of adequate photo-physical and -chemical characterization of the materials and surface processes. 

Nanocarbon structures such as fullerenes, carbon nanotubes and graphene, are characterized by their weak interphase interaction with host matrices (polymer, ceramic, metals) when fabricating composites [99,100]. In addition to their characteristic high surface area and high chemical inertness, this fact turns these carbon nanostructures into materials that are very difficult to disperse in a given matrix. However, uniform dispersion and improved nanotube/matrix interactions are necessary to increase the mechanical, physical and chemical properties as well as biocompatibility of the composites [101,102]. 

---