Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Supports pore distribution

It is clear that the separation ratio is simply the ratio of the distribution coefficients of the two solutes, which only depend on the operating temperature and the nature of the two phases. More importantly, they are independent of the mobile phase flow rate and the phase ratio of the column. This means, for example, that the same separation ratios will be obtained for two solutes chromatographed on either a packed column or a capillary column, providing the temperature is the same and the same phase system is employed. This does, however, assume that there are no exclusion effects from the support or stationary phase. If the support or stationary phase is porous, as, for example, silica gel or silica gel based materials, and a pair of solutes differ in size, then the stationary phase available to one solute may not be available to the other. In which case, unless both stationary phases have exactly the same pore distribution, if separated on another column, the separation ratios may not be the same, even if the same phase system and temperature are employed. This will become more evident when the measurement of dead volume is discussed and the importance of pore distribution is considered. [Pg.28]

While our discussion will mainly focus on sifica, other oxide materials can also be used, and they need to be characterized with the same rigorous approach. For example, in the case of meso- and microporous materials such as zeolites, SBA-15, or MCM materials, the pore size, pore distribution, surface composition, and the inner and outer surface areas need to be measured since they can affect the grafting step (and the chemistry thereafter) [5-7]. Some oxides such as alumina or silica-alumina contain Lewis acid centres/sites, which can also participate in the reactivity of the support and the grafted species. These sites need to be characterized and quantified this is typically carried out by using molecular probes (Lewis bases) such as pyridine [8,9],... [Pg.153]

The preparation parameters during the sol-gel process are of great influence on properties like pore distribution, pore volume, strength etc. of the end product. It is possible to enlarge the pores in the gelated spheres by applying a hydrothermal treatment after the gelating step [36]. All these parameters can be controlled. So this method makes it is possible to prepare tailor-made supports for catalysts in a reproducible way. [Pg.331]

Carbon number distributions are similar on all Co catalysts. As on Ru catalysts, termination probabilities decrease with increasing chain size, leading to non-Flory product distributions. The modest effects of support and dispersion on product molecular weight and C5+ selectivity (Table III) reflect differences in readsorption site density and in support pore structure (4,5,14,40,41), which control the contributions of olefin readsorption to chain growth. Carbon number distributions obey Flory kinetics for C30+ hydrocarbons the chain growth probability reaches a constant value (a ) as olefins disappear from the product stream. This constant value reflects the intrinsic probability of chain termination to paraffins by hydrogen addition it is independent of support and metal dispersion in the crystallite size range studied. [Pg.243]

Membrane chromatography proved to be a successful tool especially for separation of macromolecules. The large-size proteins cannot enter the small pores of the particles in the packed-bed columns, while in membrane-based processes they have access to a much higher binding surface due to the macroporous nature of the supports. One problem may nevertheless appear for membranes with large pore distribution. Suen [182] reported that a variation of 12% in porosity can be responsible for a loss of 50% of adsorption capacity at the breakthrough point. For variations in the membrane thickness a three times less-sensitive behavior was found. [Pg.46]

The physical characteristics of the prepared catalysts are reported in Table. 1. The pore distribution is monomodal and the medium pore size does not change from that of the support when nitrate is used as precursor and while it increases using Ni(OH)2. [Pg.335]

The support porous structure and the rate of solvent removal from the pores as well as the nature of solvent and metal compound dissolved can considerably influence both the distribution of the active component through the support grain and the catalyst dispersion [163,170-173]. As a rule, the resulting particles size of the active component will be smaller, the more liquid-phase ruptures caused by evaporation of the solvent from the support pores are attained before the solution saturation. Therefore, supports with an optimal porous structure are needed to prepare impregnated Me/C catalysts with the finest metal particles. As a result, carbon supports appropriate for synthesis of such catalysts are very limited in number. Besides, these catalysts will strongly suffer from the blocking effect (see Section 12.1.2) because some of the metal particles are localized in fine pores. [Pg.460]

Model 1-6 is a new hydrodearomatization (HDA) catalyst developed by ICERP to be used in aromatics hydrogenation of gas oil blends. The catalyst has been obtained by a highly improved NiO dispersion on the promoted alumina support having a bimodale pore distribution with a total pore volume of minimum 45 cmVg. 1-6 has a good HDA activity under rather moderate hydrotreating conditions i.e. 60 bar total pressure and a remarkable sulphur resistance. [Pg.222]

Brinker and coworkers [49] reported the synthesis of microporous silica membranes on commercial (membralox) y-alumina supports with pore diameters of 4.0 nm. Ageing of the silica sols was shown to be effective to form discrete membrane layers with an estimated thickness of 35 nm on top of the support and to inhibit pore penetration of the silica. Sols with gyration radii Rg < (radius of support pores) penetrate the support to a depth of about 3 im, which is the thickness of the y-alumina support layer. Minimization of the condensation rate during film formation was considered to decrease the width of the pore size distribution without changing the average pore radius, which was estimated to be 0.35 < Tp < 0.5 nm. The porosity of films deposited on dense supports was about 10% as calculated from refractive index measurements. [Pg.309]

Table 3 presents the main textural properties of the supports. It can be seen that the influence of operating conditions is important. Surface areas (sbet) actually vary from 15 to 82 m /g and even if porous volumes are less scattered, the pore distributions are really diversified. [Pg.484]

Titania and titania containing mixed oxides are extensively used as catalysts and supports. Recently, many preparation techniques have been developed to control their pore structure. However, some of them are not suitable for a systematic control of the pore distributions. In addition, pores usually disappear after calcination at high temperature [1]. To avoid this problem, catalysts were calcined at relatively low temperature [2-4] or an extraction method was used to remove organic residues [2]. Under such mild conditions, it is impossible to remove completely the organic residues which are bonded to a titania precursor. [Pg.723]

The fresh catalysts were analysed by BET, XRD and TPR techniques. BET analyses show clear differences in the surface area, pore volume and pore size distribution between cerium catalysts (A and B) (Fig. 1). Pore distribution and morphological parameters of catalyst B are similar to those of pure Zr02 (23 m /g for Zr02 and 22 m /g for support B), whereas the surface area of catalyst A is markedly higher (71 mVg). [Pg.909]

The properties and requirements of activated carbon supports are closely related to the requirements of the catalyst. There are a series of parameters that are important for the selectivity and activity of a catalyst for example, the surface area of the support, the distribution of the pores, and the pore volume, the purity of the activated carbon, and the number and functionality of the surface groups. In regard to engineering aspects, particle size distribution plays an important role for the filtration of the catalyst, and the mechanical stability needs to be considered for the recyclability of the catalyst. [Pg.536]

The objective was the production of enriched uranium-235 from natural uranium by differential diffusion of highly reactive uranium hexafluoride through a porous membrane. A number of surface chemistry problems related to catalysis had to be solved. The work at Princeton was in support of the main effort at the SAM Laboratories of Columbia University. Aside from production of the diffusion barrier, the task was to characterize its pore distribution and stabilize it from corrosion. Taylor was associate director of the SAM Laboratories, spending his days in New York and evenings and weekends at Princeton. Turkevich, in addition to teaching both at Princeton... [Pg.469]

Concerning the preparation of thin membranes directly on porous supports, a lower thickness limit seemingly exists for which a dense metal layer can be obtained. This thickness limit increases with increasing surfaee roughness and pore size in the support s top layer." " Clearly, this relation puts strong demands on the support quality in terms of narrow pore size distribution, and the amount of surface defects. Therefore both pore size and roughness of the support surface are often reduced by the application of meso-porous intermediate layers prior to deposition of the permselective metal layer. This procedure facilitates the preparation of thin defect-free membranes beeause it is relatively easier to cover small pores by filling them with metal. It is therefore conceivable that for a certain low Pd-alloy thickness and support pore size, the H2 flux becomes limited by the support resistance. ... [Pg.46]


See other pages where Supports pore distribution is mentioned: [Pg.785]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.723]    [Pg.723]    [Pg.729]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.734]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.329]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.157 ]




SEARCH



Pore distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info