Supercritical fluid extraction applications

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) has been widely used to the extraction processes in pharmaceutical industries. Besides application of SFE in phannaceuticals, it has been applied on a wide spectmm of natural products and food industries such as natural pesticides, antioxidants, vegetable oil, flavors, perfumes and etc [1-2]. 

In order to reduce or eliminate off-line sample preparation, multidimensional chromatographic techniques have been employed in these difficult analyses. LC-GC has been employed in numerous applications that involve the analysis of poisonous compounds or metabolites from biological matrices such as fats and tissues, while GC-GC has been employed for complex samples, such as arson propellants and for samples in which special selectivity, such as chiral recognition, is required. Other techniques include on-line sample preparation methods, such as supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)-GC and LC-GC-GC. In many of these applications, the chromatographic method is coupled to mass spectrometry or another spectrometiic detector for final confirmation of the analyte identity, as required by many courts of law. 

The coupling of supercritical fluid extraction (SEE) with gas chromatography (SEE-GC) provides an excellent example of the application of multidimensional chromatography principles to a sample preparation method. In SEE, the analytical matrix is packed into an extraction vessel and a supercritical fluid, usually carbon dioxide, is passed through it. The analyte matrix may be viewed as the stationary phase, while the supercritical fluid can be viewed as the mobile phase. In order to obtain an effective extraction, the solubility of the analyte in the supercritical fluid mobile phase must be considered, along with its affinity to the matrix stationary phase. The effluent from the extraction is then collected and transferred to a gas chromatograph. In his comprehensive text, Taylor provides an excellent description of the principles and applications of SEE (44), while Pawliszyn presents a description of the supercritical fluid as the mobile phase in his development of a kinetic model for the extraction process (45). 

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been by far the most important method for separating chlorophylls. Open column chromatography and thin layer chromatography are still used for clean-up procedures to isolate and separate carotenoids and other lipids from chlorophylls and for preparative applications, but both are losing importance for analytical purposes due to their low resolution and have been replaced by more effective techniques like solid phase, supercritical fluid extraction and counter current chromatography. The whole analysis should be as brief as possible, since each additional step is a potential source of epimers and allomers. 

Supercritical fluid extraction (SEE) is another modern separation technology usually employed to extract lipophilic compounds such as cranberry seed oil, lycopene, coumarins, and other seed oils. Anthocyanins generally and glycosylated anthocyanins in particular were considered unsuitable for SEE due to their hydrophilic properties, since SEE is applicable for non-polar analytes. However, a small amount of methanol was applied as co-solvent to increase CO2 polarity in anthocyanin extraction from grape pomace. New applications of SEE for anthocyanin purification have been reported for cosmetic applications from red fruits. ... 

Cajthaml T, V Sasek (2005) Application of supercritical fluid extraction (SEE) to predict bioremediation efficiency of long-term composting of PAH-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol 39 8448-8452. 

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is a technique in which a supercritical fluid [formed when the critical temperature Tf) and critical pressure Pf) for the fluid are exceeded simultaneously] is used as an extraction solvent instead of an organic solvent. By far the most common choice of a supercritical fluid is carbon dioxide (CO2) because CO2 has a low critical temperature (re = 31.1 °C), is inexpensive, and is safe." SFE has the advantage of lower viscosity and improved diffusion coefficients relative to traditional organic solvents. Also, if supercritical CO2 is used as the extraction solvent, the solvent (CO2) can easily be removed by bringing the extract to atmospheric pressure. Supercritical CO2 itself is a very nonpolar solvent that may not have broad applicability as an extraction solvent. To overcome this problem, modifiers such as methanol can be used to increase the polarity of the SFE extraction solvent. Another problem associated with SFE using CO2 is the co-extraction of lipids and other nonpolar interferents. To overcome this problem, a combination of SFE with SPE can be used. Stolker et al." provided a review of several SFE/SPE methods described in the literature. 

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is generally used for the extraction of selected analytes from solid sample matrices, but applications have been reported for aqueous samples. In one study, recoveries of 87-100% were obtained for simazine, propazine, and trietazine at the 0.05 ug mL concentration level using methanol-modified CO2 (10%, v/v) to extract the analytes, previously preconcentrated on a C-18 Empore extraction disk. The analysis was performed using LC/UV detection. Freeze-dried water samples were subjected to SFE for atrazine and simazine, and the optimum recoveries were obtained using the mildest conditions studied (50 °C, 20 MPa, and 30 mL of CO2). In some cases when using LEE and LC analysis, co-extracted humic substances created interference for the more polar metabolites when compared with SFE for the preparation of the same water sample. ... 

Applications The majority of SFE applications involves the extraction of dry solid matrices. Supercritical fluid extraction has demonstrated great utility for the extraction of organic analytes from a wide variety of solid matrices. The combination of fast extractions and easy solvent evaporation has resulted in numerous applications for SFE. Important areas of analytical SFE are environmental analysis (41 %), food analysis (38 %) and polymer characterisation (11%) [292], Determination of additives in polymers is considered attractive by SFE because (i) the SCF can more quickly permeate throughout the polymer matrix compared to conventional solvents, resulting in a rapid extraction (ii) the polymer matrix is (generally) not soluble in SCFs, so that polymer dissolution and subsequent precipitation are not necessary and (iii) organic solvents are not required, or are used only in very small quantities, reducing preparation time and disposal costs [359]. 

B.A. Charpentier and M.R. Sevenants (eds), Supercritical Fluid Extraction and Chromatography Techniques and Applications, ACS Symposium Series 366, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1988). 

On-line SFE-GC finds use especially in petroleum-related applications [54], but has also been applied to polymer additives [47,55]. PBT polymers were extracted at 200 bar and 55 °C for the determination of carbonic acid diphenyl esters and other volatiles, using on-line SFE-GC-MS [47]. Extraction of entrained volatiles is a quality test for some polymers. SFE-GC-FTIR-MS has been employed to reveal the cause of odour of a smelly hose (a plasticiser) [56]. SFE-GC can also profitably be used for the determination of residual solvents in polymers such as benzene, toluene and o-xylene [57]. Oligomers of PE (up to 1000 Da) were determined by GC after supercritical fluid extraction [58]. 

V. Lopez-Avila, C. Charan, and J. van Emon, Supercritical fluid extraction-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay applications for determination of pesticides in soil and food, in Immunoassays for Residue Analysis Food Safety (R.C. Beier and L.H. Stanker eds), ACS Symposium Series 621, American Chemical Society, Washington (1996). 

For the underlying science of supercritical fluids, try Steve Howdle s short article Supercritical solutions in Chemistry in Britain, August 2000, p. 23, which represents a useful introduction to the topic. For more applications of such fluids, try the short review article Some applications of supercritical fluid extraction , by D. P. Ndiomu and C. F. Simpson in Analytica ChimicaActa, 1988,213,237. The article is somewhat dated now but readable. A look at the contents list of The Journal of Supercritical Fluids will be more up-to-date go to http //www.umecheme. maine.edu/jsf. 

Foreign uranium resources, 17 522 Foreman and Veatch cell, 9 664 Forensic analysts, certification of, 12 95 Forensic biology, 12 102-104 Forensic chemistry, 12 89-104 physical evidence in, 12 90-95 Forensic laboratories, local and state, 12 98 Forensics, liquid chromatography applications, 6 465 Forensic science laboratories, 12 95 Forensic science, supercritical fluid extraction in, 24 14 Forensic testing, 12 95-104 Forensic toxicology, interpretation of results in, 12 98... 

The microwave assisted extraction for organic compounds including polyaromatic hydrocarbons, phenols and organochlorine insecticides, described in section 11.1.8 [25] has been applied to sediments. The application of supercritical fluid extraction to the determination of various insecticides in soils described in section 11.1.7 [23] has been applied to river sediments. 

Lopez-Avila V, Dodhiwala NS, Becker WF. 1990. Supercritical fluid extraction and its application to environmental analysis. J Chromatographic Sci 28 468-476. 

King JW. 1989. Fundamentals and applications of supercritical fluid extraction in chromatographic science. J Chromatogr Sci 27 355-364. 

Supercritical fluid extraction (EPA 3540, for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons EPA 3561 for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons) is applicable to the extraction of semivolatile constituents. Supercritical fluid extraction involves heating and pressuring a mobile phase to supercritical conditions (where the solvent has the properties of a gas and a liquid). The supercritical fluid is passed through the soil sample, and the analytes are concentrated on a sorbent or trapped cryogenically. The analytes are eluted with a solvent and analyzed using conventional techniques. Carbon dioxide is the most popular mobile phase. 

Supercritical fluids were soon found to be highly efficient extraction media, chiefly because of their high solvating power, their low viscosities (intermediate between a gas and a liquid), and their low surface tensions that enable their penetration deep into the extraction matrix. Supercritical fluid extraction (SEE) used in isolation is generally not selective enough to separate specific solutes from the matrix without further cleanup or resolution from coextracted species prior to qualitative and quantitative analysis. Consequently, for analytical applications, SFE is usually used in combination with chromatographic techniques to improve the overall selectivity in the isolation of specific solutes. The combined use of SFE with chromatographic techniques is quite recent. 

---