Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sulfite reaction scheme

Another arylation reaction which uses arenediazonium salts as reagents and is catalyzed by copper should be discussed in this section on Meerwein reactions. It is the Beech reaction (Scheme 10-49) in which ketoximes such as formaldoxime (10.13, R=H), acetaldoxime (10.13, R=CH3), and other ketoximes with aliphatic residues R are arylated (Beech, 1954). The primary products are arylated oximes (10.14) yielding a-arylated aldehydes (10.15, R=H) or ketones (10.15, R=alkyl). Obviously the C=N group of these oximes reacts like a C = C group in classical Meerwein reactions. It is interesting that the addition of some sodium sulfite is necessary for the Beech reaction (0.1 to 0.2 equivalent of CuS04 and 0.03 equivalent of Na2S03). [Pg.246]

In the 1,2,3-trithiole series, 1,2,3-trithiole 2-oxide (29) was obtained in 39% yield from the reaction of 2,2-dimethyl-1,3,2-dithiagermole (112) with thionyl chloride (Equation (25)) <88RTC440>. 1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2-oxide (8) is conveniently prepared by reaction of 1,2-dihydroxyethane with either thionyl chloride <66HC(2l-l)l> or dimethyl sulfite <76CRV747> (Scheme 26). An alternative method. [Pg.573]

With respect to the molybdenum center, it appears that a spectator 0x0 ligand see Spectator Ligand (Ion)) controls the electronic structure allowing the second 0x0 ligand to participate in OAT reactions with the substrate see Substrate), X = for sulfite oxidase (Scheme 3, a - b) the substrate enters the enzyme via a substrate (solvent) access channel directed toward the exchangeable 0x0 group. Egress of the oxidized substrate, XO = S04, permits the... [Pg.2785]

Both these reagents will react with alkyl halides in aqueous media to give the corresponding sulfonic acids (21). This procedure has been used extensively for the preparation of aliphatic sulfonic acids in good yields (see Chapter 7, p. 100). Sodium hydrogen sulfite will also form sulfonic acids by addition to alkenes in the presence of peroxide catalysts (anti-Markownikoff reaction) (Scheme 19). [Pg.29]

The extent to which these three different paths will contribute to the system depends on the pH, temperature, and concentration of nitrite and sulfite species. It is believed that process 1 is favored by a neutral or mildly acidic solution processes 2 and 3 are expected to become increasingly important as the pH of the solution decreases. A summary of reactions that can take place as a result of interactions between sulfite and nitrite ions is shown in the following reaction scheme ... [Pg.129]

We have measured the rate of oxidation of sodium and calcium sulfite to sulfate in a solution containing an organic buffer and the catalysts manganese and iron. The work was carried out in order to develop kinetic rate expressions rather than to explore the fundamentals of the reaction scheme. [Pg.187]

The higjily water-soluble dienophiles 2.4f and2.4g have been synthesised as outlined in Scheme 2.5. Both compounds were prepared from p-(bromomethyl)benzaldehyde (2.8) which was synthesised by reducing p-(bromomethyl)benzonitrile (2.7) with diisobutyl aluminium hydride following a literature procedure2.4f was obtained in two steps by conversion of 2.8 to the corresponding sodium sulfonate (2.9), followed by an aldol reaction with 2-acetylpyridine. In the preparation of 2.4g the sequence of steps had to be reversed Here, the aldol condensation of 2.8 with 2-acetylpyridine was followed by nucleophilic substitution of the bromide of 2.10 by trimethylamine. Attempts to prepare 2.4f from 2.10 by treatment with sodium sulfite failed, due to decomposition of 2.10 under the conditions required for the substitution by sulfite anion. [Pg.50]

Regenerable absorption processes have also been developed. In these processes, the solvent releases the sulfur dioxide in a regenerator and then is reused in the absorber. The WelLman-Lord process is typical of a regenerable process. Figure 11 illustrates the process flow scheme. Sulfur dioxide removal efficiency is from 95—98%. The gas is prescmbbed with water, then contacts a sodium sulfite solution in an absorber. The sulfur dioxide is absorbed into solution by the following reaction ... [Pg.216]

Neither the reaction to the intermediate maleic acid monoester nor the subsequent sulfation to the sulfosuccinic acid monoester sodium salt is fully complete (Scheme 2). Around 80% of the solid material is estimated to be true sulfosuccinate. Whether the unreacted material or possible side products are beneficial to the finished product has not yet been evaluated. Due to the necessity of dissolving the sodium sulfite (or bisulfite) in water, the product obtained is not normally more highly concentrated than 40% active matter. The consistency of the material varies from clear, low viscous liquids to pastes. Some substance can be spray-dried to obtain concentrated powders. [Pg.511]

A common reaction sequence is shown in the schemes printed above. The sulfosuccinate monoesters are produced by a two-step reaction. In the first step 1 mol of maleic anhydride is reacted with a hydroxyl group-bearing component. In the second step the monoester is reacted with sodium sulfite (or sodium bisulfite) to form the disodium alkyl sulfosuccinate. At the so-called halfester stage, there are two possibilities for an electrophilic attack [61] (Michael-type reaction) at the double bond (Scheme 6). Reactivity differences between the two vinylic carbons should be very small, so that probably an exclusive formation of one single regioisomer can be excluded. [Pg.514]

For many years phenol was made on a large industrial scale from the substitution reaction of benzene sulfonic acid with sodium hydroxide. This produced sodium sulfite as a by-product. Production and disposal of this material, contaminated with aromatic compounds, on a large scale contributed to the poor economics of the process, which has now been replaced by the much more atom economic cumene route (see Chapter 2, Schemes 2.2 and 2.3). [Pg.27]

Arenesulfinate esters are usually prepared from an arenesulfinyl chloride and an alcohol in ether and pyridine. The arenesulfinyl chloride is usually prepared from the sodium arenesulfinate which is made by reduction of the arenesulfonyl chloride, preferably by aqueous sodium sulfite. After the crystalline sulfinate epimer has been removed by filtration, the equilibrium between the epimers remaining in the mother liquor may be reestablished by the addition of hydrogen chloride as shown by Herbrandson and Cusano . In this way the yield of the least soluble diastereomer may be increased beyond that which exists in the original reaction mixture (Scheme 1). Solladie prepared sulfinate ester 19 in 90% yield using this technique and published the details of his procedure. Estep and Tavares also published a convenient recipe for this method, although their yields were somewhat lower than Solladie s. [Pg.61]

Scheme 7.11 shows the product structures resulting from the dithionite reduction of a simplified version of WV-15. The symmetric sulfite diester was extracted from the reaction mixture with methylene chloride. The isolation and characterization of the sulfite diester confirmed that this species can form in dithionite reductive activation reactions and provided the chemical shift for the 10a-13C center of a mitosene sulfite ester (49.37 ppm). The aqueous fraction of the reaction contained the mitosene sulfonate and trace amounts of Bunte salt, based on their 13C chemical shifts. [Pg.231]

Dithionite reduction of 13C-labeled WV-15 (structure in Scheme 7.6) was carried out in anaerobic D20 and the resulting products evaluated by quantitative 13C-NMR spectroscopy immediately after the reduction (Fig. 7.8).45 The spectrum indicates that both the sulfite ester and the sulfonate are formed in a 60 40 ratio. Also, no long-lived methide species are observed in this reaction. [Pg.231]

The 1,2-cyclic sulfites are readily obtained from anomeric mixtures of 1,2-diols by reaction with sulfinyl diimidazolide as mixtures of exo- and endo-isomers at sulfur (Scheme 4.34) [312-314],... [Pg.251]

The cyclic sulfites were first found to react with lithium phenoxides as nucleophiles in DMF in a one-pot procedure commencing from the unprotected diol [357]. Subsequent work opened up this class of donor to alcohol nucleophiles in conjunction with the use of a Lewis add, such as Yb(OTf)3 or Ho(OTf)3, to activate the donor in refluxing toluene (Scheme 4.57) [314,358,359]. The very high degree of P-selec-tivity observed in these reactions is consistent with an SN2-like displacement of the sulfite oxygen. [Pg.260]

Uzan et al. have reported an alternative route to 1,2-fused thionocarbamates from 1,2-carbohydrate sulfites.49 The reaction proceeded via formation of a -configured thiocyanate, which further epimerizes to the ot-anomer, ready to undergo cyclisation into the fused OZT (Scheme 36). [Pg.145]

Sulfite is an extremely good nucleophile for activated aromatic systems and reaction with l-substituted-2,4,6-trinitrobenzenes (1) may result in cr-adduct formation or in displacement of the 1-substiment as shown in Scheme 1. When X = OEt or SEt, adducts (2) and (3) formed by reaction at unsubstituted positions are long-lived. [Pg.275]

If the snlfate anion-radical is bonnd to the snrface of a catalyst (sulfated zirconia), it is capable of generating the cation-radicals of benzene and tolnene (Timoshok et al. 1996). Conversion of benzene on snlfated zirconia was narrowly stndied in a batch reactor under mild conditions (100°C, 30 min contact) (Farcasiu et al. 1996, Ghencin and Farcasin 1996a, 1996b). The proven mechanism consists of a one-electron transfer from benzene to the catalyst, with the formation of the benzene cation-radical and the sulfate radical on the catalytic snrface. This ion-radical pair combines to give a snrface combination of sulfite phenyl ester with rednced snlfated zirconia. The ester eventually gives rise to phenol (Scheme 1.45). Coking is not essential for the reaction shown in Scheme 1.45. Oxidation completely resumes the activity of the worked-out catalyst. [Pg.63]

Consideration of reasonable mechanisms for producing formic acid from an aldose led to the hypothesis that the sugar forms an addition product with the hydroperoxide anion, comparable with an aldehyde sulfite or the addition product of aldoses with chlorous acid (52). The intermediate product (12) could decompose by a free-radical or an ionic mechanism. In the absence of a free-radical catalyst, the ionic mechanism of Scheme VIII seems probable. By either mechanism the products are formic acid and the next lower sugar. The lower sugar then repeats the process, with the result that the aldose is degraded stepwise to formic acid. Addition of the hydroperoxide anion to the carbonyl carbon is in accord with its strong nucleophilic character (53) and with certain reaction mechanisms suggested in the literature (54) for related substances. [Pg.89]


See other pages where Sulfite reaction scheme is mentioned: [Pg.366]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.1191]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.69]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.129 , Pg.130 ]




SEARCH



Reaction scheme

© 2024 chempedia.info