Subsurface cleaning

To assess the well construction materials compatibility versus the subsurface environment and the pesticide of interest, manufacturers can provide data about the various well construction materials or samples can be acquired for laboratory analysis. Also, QC samples of each material can be collected during installation and preserved for laboratory analysis for potential sample bias, if necessary. In addition to well construction materials, the potable water used to clean drilling equipment and to prepare the grout and hydrate bentonite should also be collected for laboratory analysis (see Section 3.2.6). 

For practitioners of in situ technologies, note that U.S. EPA has issued a policy statement that reinjection of contaminated groundwater is allowed under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)35 36 as long as certain conditions are met. This policy is intended to apply to remedies involving in situ bioremediation and other forms of in situ treatment. Under this policy, groundwater may be reinjected if it is treated aboveground prior to reinjection. Treatment may be by a pump-and-treat system or by the addition of amendments meant to facilitate subsurface treatment. Also, the treatment must be intended to substantially reduce hazardous constituents in the groundwater (either before or after reinjection) the cleanup must be protective of human health and the environment and the injection must be part of a response action intended to clean up the environment.37... 

In simple cases, the mobility in the subsurface of a sorbing contaminant can be described by a retardation factor. Where contaminated water passes into a clean aquifer, a reaction front develops. The front separates clean, or nearly clean water downstream from fully contaminated water upstream. Along the front, the sorption reaction removes the contaminant from solution. The retardation factor describes how rapidly the front moves through the aquifer, relative to the groundwater. A retardation factor of two means the front, and hence the contamination, will take twice as long as the groundwater to traverse a given distance. 

Those federal regulations of interest and importance for addressing subsurface environmental issues in chronological order of establishment include the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC), the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), the Resource, Conservation, and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FTFRA), and the Petroleum Safety Act (PSA). These regulations are discussed below. 

Free-phase NAPL refers to NAPL that exists as an independent phase, not as a dissolved component in the pore water or pore atmosphere. The environmental concerns associated with sites affected with free-phase NAPLs revolve around hydrocarbon-impacted soil (residual hydrocarbon), the NAPL itself (which can serve as a continued source for groundwater contamination), dissolved hydrocarbon constituents in groundwater, and hydrocarbon vapors. The detection of free-phase NAPLs in the subsurface presents many challenges. Two questions frequently arise at sites impacted by NAPLs how much is there and how long will it take to clean up. Before one can address these two questions, assessments of the type and subsurface distri-... 

There exist several methods or lines of evidence to demonstrate whether or not natural attenuation is occurring. Because sites can vary dramatically in their complexity and amount of effort required, the level of documentation that can be reasonably obtained will vary. What is important is that because many impacted sites will be or are difficult to clean up completely to the satisfaction of all parties, the use of natural attenuation will likely be at minimum considered at some stage of the project or remedial action. It is thus prudent to generate evidence and documentation to assess the suitability of natural attenuation as part of the site subsurface characterization process. 

Without appropriate cleanup measures, BTEX often persist in subsurface environments, endangering groundwater resources and public health. Bioremediation, in conjunction with free product recovery, is one of the most cost-effective approaches to clean up BTEX-contaminated sites [326]. However, while all BTEX compounds are biodegradable, there are several factors that can limit the success of BTEX bioremediation, such as pollutant concentration, active biomass concentration, temperature, pH, presence of other substrates or toxicants, availability of nutrients and electron acceptors, mass transfer limitations, and microbial adaptation. These factors have been recognized in various attempts to optimize clean-up operations. Yet, limited attention has been given to the exploitation of favorable substrate interactions to enhance in situ BTEX biodegradation. 

It is interesting to compare our results on single crystal surfaces with those of Turner and coworkers for Pt, Pd, and Ir. In this study wires of Pt formed less than one layer of oxide under CO oxidation conditions. Considering that the Pt wires were known to have substantial Si impurities, which form subsurface oxides , it is not surprising that some oxide was formed. The absence of impurities on the rigorously cleaned, Pt single crystal surface used in this study precluded the formation of any oxides during CO oxidation. 

Indeed phenomena typical of clean fee surfaces as surface and subsurface relaxation are observedThe (110) face exhibits larger effects than the (111) face because of its lower density. 

As alluded to before, the adsorption of atoms and molecules may also induce segregation in alloys. Upon revisiting the thermodynamic behavior of the improved Cu-Ag alloy catalysts for ethylene epoxidation synthesized by Linic et al, (section 2.1) Piccinin et al. calculated that, while in the absence of oxygen Cu prefers to stay in the subsurface layers, oxygen adsorption causes it to segregate to the surface which then phase-separates into clean Ag(lll) and various Cu surface oxides under typical industrial conditions (Fig. 7). This casts doubt on the active state of the previous Cu-Ag catalysts being a well-mixed surface Ag-Cu alloy. 

Floor vegetation (weeds or cover crops) can be managed in orchards where its presence for all or part of the year is desirable, particularly if a clean strip down the tree row is maintained (Figure 17.1). Beneficial effects of the floor vegetation in these crops include the prevention of erosion, especially for orchards or vineyards on sloping terrain during periods of heavy rain. Weeds and vegetation also help improve water penetration in soils likely to surface seal or where subsurface impervious layers are a problem (Day et al, 1968 Foshee et al, 1997). 

Ambient air monitoring in the vicinity of a Superfund clean-up site detected 2,3,7,8-TCDD levels on the order of 1 pg/m3 (0.08 ppq) (Fairless et al. 1987). The surface and subsurface soils at the site were tested and found to contain 2,3,7,8-TCDD at concentrations above 1 ppb at most locations within the site. 

Surface relaxation is also important for the 011 surface (see Table 5). As for the clean surface, the relaxations are associated with a columnar displacement of the Zr ions [31] i.e. the surface Zr ions are inwardly relaxed, while the subsurface Zr ions relax outwardly along the z-direction. The oxygens show a negligible surface relaxation. The largest displacement (> 0.2 A) is observed when the metals are deposited on top of Zr, while when adsorbed on top of the sites denoted O and Zrjs, the outermost Zr ions are inwardly relaxed by 0.1 A. 

Table 8 Mullikcn charges, dipole moments, and quadrupole moments ealeuiated for the Pd and Pt/Zrf) OI I) intetfaces, employing the Hatiree-Foek Hamiltonian, Values refer to the geometry optimised structure at the GGA level, Mulliken charges for the relaxed clean surface arc 0,(1,37 e) Zr (+2,76 e) and Zr, /, (+2,9,6 e). The quadrupole moment corresponds to the operator /, -x72 72, Zr refer to the Zr ion in the subsurface, while O, represents the surface oxygen on W hieh no metal atom is adsorbed.

Recently Koutecky (23) has shown that localized subsurface states may also occur if the perturbing potential due to the existence of the surface is large enough. These states would have wave functions localized about subsurface atoms and their energy in the forbidden zone would be between the surface states and the band out of which the states had been perturbed. These treatments have all assumed that the potential depends only on the direction into the crystal a one-dimensional potential. The discussion above of the cleaned germanium surface has shown that a three-dimensional potential may be necessary. A second failing of these treatments is their lack of consistency the effect on the potential of the filling of the surface states with... 

The amount of CO adsorbed on the palladium particles can be deduced from CO-TDS (Fig. 3 Id). The CO-TDS spectrum was identical to that observed after dosing of the same amount of CO on the clean particles, demonstrating that the particles were fully covered with CO and that Ft was replaced from the palladium surface. FFowever, FF had not desorbed because the FF2-TDS experiment (Fig. 3Id) indicated that the overall amount of hydrogen was unchanged. Apparently, CO had displaced surface FF to the subsurface and bulk of the palladium nanoparticles (see schematics in Fig. 31 partial Ft spillover to the support is unlikely because no OFF groups or H2O were detected). 

This equation was first derived by Ward and Tordai, but in sec. I.6.5e we gave a more general derivation without involving the notion of a subsurface. In the integral u is a dummy variable of dimension ItlmeJ and c,(0,u) is the concentration of 1 on the surface. So, c,(0.u) = 0 at the beginning of adsorption on a pristine adsorbent. Hence, for the initial part of the adsorption on such a clean... 

In our lit, the subsurface (n = 1) peak of the clean sample falls approximately halfway between the surface and bulk resonances. This is in very good agreement with a five-layer slab calculation (70) and shows that more than half of the spectrum contains information from the surface region. It should be noted that NMR layer model considers directly the layer-to-layer variation of the NMR shift, whereas it would perhaps be more reasonable physically to start from a hypothesis concerning the variation of the density of states (Section VI.C). 

Fig.. 5.5. The LDOS variation with layer number (cf. Fig. 48) derived from NMR data for Pt/Ti02 with clean and hydrogen-ajvered surfaces. For the clean sample, the sub-subsurface layer ( 2) is already bulk-like, but the perturbation by the hydrogen reaches...

---