Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Substitution models choosing

There were two schools of thought concerning attempts to extend Hammett s treatment of substituent effects to electrophilic substitutions. It was felt by some that the effects of substituents in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were particularly susceptible to the specific demands of the reagent, and that the variability of the polarizibility effects, or direct resonance interactions, would render impossible any attempted correlation using a two-parameter equation. - o This view was not universally accepted, for Pearson, Baxter and Martin suggested that, by choosing a different model reaction, in which the direct resonance effects of substituents participated, an equation, formally similar to Hammett s equation, might be devised to correlate the rates of electrophilic aromatic and electrophilic side chain reactions. We shall now consider attempts which have been made to do this. [Pg.137]

During this process of designing sequence changes, models were built and assessed to ensure that there were no obvious steric clashes and that the hydrophobic core was well packed. Furthermore, secondary structure prediction was also used to monitor the progress of change and to choose among different possible substitutions. The final sequence (see Table 17.3) contains 28 changes it had 50% identity to B1 and the similarity to Rop had increased from 5.4% identity to 41%. [Pg.370]

A Hammett plot of the pK values of p-substituted phenols against the Op values shows serious deviations for the members of the series at the extremes of the o scale, that is, for substituents that are strongly electron donating or electron withdrawing. It was recognized very early that such deviations could be rectified by choosing an appropriate o value for such substituents in effect, this means a different model reaction was adopted. The chemical basis of the procedure can be illustrated with the p-nitro substituent. The p-nitrophenolate ion is stabilized by through resonance as shown in 2. [Pg.320]

Now substitute a CH3 group for one hydrogen. We must first decide which conformation we want to consider, and we will choose 9, in which Hc lies in the molecular plane, and Ha and H are above and below. Next, we need a bonding model for the CH3 group. An obvious choice is the set of a MO s obtained from spa hybrids on C2 and lr orbitals on Ha, H , and Hc. The bonding members of this set are shown in 10. (For this particular problem we shall not need the... [Pg.549]

Another more arbitrary but equally reasonable technique is to choose a single reaction as a model typical of the processes under consideration. The results from study of this reference reaction then could be employed to define the parameters for the substituent groups in other similar reactions. Thus, Hammett (1940) selected the ionization equilibria for substituted benzoic acids in water as a reference reaction and Taft (1956) employed the ionization equilibria of 4-substituted bicyclo[2.2.2]octane-l-carboxylic acids (Roberts and Moreland, 1953) for evaluating the inductive e-constants. The constants so defined are invariant. The validity of this scheme is measured by the agreement between the predictions of the reference reaction and the actual systems under study. [Pg.83]

In the reactive case, r is not equal to zero. Then, Eq. (3) represents a nonhmoge-neous system of first-order quasilinear partial differential equations and the theory is becoming more involved. However, the chemical reactions are often rather fast, so that chemical equilibrium in addition to phase equilibrium can be assumed. The chemical equilibrium conditions represent Nr algebraic constraints which reduce the dynamic degrees of freedom of the system in Eq. (3) to N - Nr. In the limit of reaction equilibrium the kinetic rate expressions for the reaction rates become indeterminate and must be eliminated from the balance equations (Eq. (3)). Since the model Eqs. (3) are linear in the reaction rates, this is always possible. Following the ideas in Ref. [41], this is achieved by choosing the first Nr equations of Eq. (3) as reference. The reference equations are solved for the unknown reaction rates and afterwards substituted into the remaining N - Nr equations. [Pg.156]

The larger we choose Dm, the smaller is Ax and the better is the model hence Dm is usually set at a high constant value such as 0.45. Substituting for At, one obtains... [Pg.791]

With PHYLIP, DnaDist computes a distance matrix from nucleotide sequences. Phylogenetic trees are generated by any one of the available tools utilizing the distance matrix programs (Neighbor, Fitch or Kitsch). DnaDist allows the user to choose between three models of nucleotide substitution. [Pg.694]

Now we can compare calculated amount of unreacted cresol, degree of 2,4-substitution, resin composition, and resin DPn with experiment. These comparisons allow us to choose exact values of the relative reactivities from within the ranges specified by measurement error in the experiments, and they allow us to check the validity of the model upon which the calculations are based. The results are shown in Figures 1-4. [Pg.314]

Li and Lee [98] propose a model of market competition in which a customer values cost and quality as well as speed of delivery. In their model, there are two firms in the market providing substitutable goods or services in a make-to-order fashion. When demand arises, a customer chooses the firm that maximizes its expected utility of price, quality and response time. They study the relationships between price and processing speed (capacity) and show that the rapid response does give a competitor the advantage of price premium and market share. They assume that customers can observe the congestion levels of the firms, and their choices are dynamic. [Pg.371]


See other pages where Substitution models choosing is mentioned: [Pg.545]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.312]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.339 ]




SEARCH



Choosing

© 2024 chempedia.info