Electronic effects 3-substituents

A familiar feature of the electronic theory is the classification of substituents, in terms of the inductive and conjugative or resonance effects, which it provides. Examples from substituents discussed in this book are given in table 7.2. The effects upon orientation and reactivity indicated are only the dominant ones, and one of our tasks is to examine in closer detail how descriptions of substituent effects of this kind meet the facts of nitration. In general, such descriptions find wide acceptance, the more so since they are now known to correspond to parallel descriptions in terms of molecular orbital theory ( 7.2.2, 7.2.3). Only in respect of the interpretation to be placed upon the inductive effect is there still serious disagreement. It will be seen that recent results of nitration studies have produced evidence on this point ( 9.1.1). 

The applicability of the two-parameter equation and the constants devised by Brown to electrophilic aromatic substitutions was tested by plotting values of the partial rate factors for a reaction against the appropriate substituent constants. It was maintained that such comparisons yielded satisfactory linear correlations for the results of many electrophilic substitutions, the slopes of the correlations giving the values of the reaction constants. If the existence of linear free energy relationships in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were not in dispute, the above procedure would suffice, and the precision of the correlation would measure the usefulness of the p+cr+ equation. However, a point at issue was whether the effect of a substituent could be represented by a constant, or whether its nature depended on the specific reaction. To investigate the effect of a particular substituent in different reactions, the values for the various reactions of the logarithms of the partial rate factors for the substituent were plotted against the p+ values of the reactions. This procedure should show more readily whether the effect of a substituent depends on the reaction, in which case deviations from a hnear relationship would occur. It was concluded that any variation in substituent effects was random, and not a function of electron demand by the electrophile. ... 

Fig. 1. Trends in effects of 4- and 5-substituenls (expressed as an a variation of R) on the proiomeric equilibrium calculated using the HMO method. When curves do not cross no inversion of protomeric equilibrium is expected to be induced by electronic substituent effects, 4-R-(----) 5-R-(-----). F,E formation energy (see Table 1).

A vinyl group is an extremely effective electron releasing substituent Resonance of the type shown delocalizes the rr electrons of the double bond and disperses the pos itive charge... 

Table 19 3 lists the ionization constants of some substituted benzoic acids The largest effects are observed when strongly electron withdrawing substituents are ortho to the carboxyl group An o nitro substituent for example increases the acidity of benzoic acid 100 fold Substituent effects are small at positions meta and para to the carboxyl group In those cases the values are clustered m the range 3 5-4 5... 

A nitro group behaves the same way m both reactions it attracts electrons Reaction is retarded when electrons flow from the aromatic ring to the attacking species (electrophilic aromatic substitution) Reaction is facilitated when electrons flow from the attacking species to the aromatic ring (nucleophilic aromatic substitution) By being aware of the connection between reactivity and substituent effects you will sharpen your appreciation of how chemical reactions occur... 

A tertiary carbonium ion is more stable than a secondary carbonium ion, which is in turn more stable than a primary carbonium ion. Therefore, the alkylation of ben2ene with isobutylene is much easier than is alkylation with ethylene. The reactivity of substituted aromatics for electrophilic substitution is affected by the inductive and resonance effects of a substituent. An electron-donating group, such as the hydroxyl and methyl groups, activates the alkylation and an electron-withdrawing group, such as chloride, deactivates it. 

Hydrolysis reactions involving tetrahedral intermediates are subject to steric and electronic effects. Electron-withdrawing substituents faciUtate, but electron-donating and bulky substituents retard basic hydrolysis. Steric effects in acid-cataly2ed hydrolysis are similar to those in base-cataly2ed hydrolysis, but electronic effects are much less important in acid-cataly2ed reactions. Higher temperatures also accelerate the reaction. 

Substituent effects are often considerable, particularly when strongly electron-donating effects (to the aza-nitrogen) are present, when upheld shifts of up to 60 p.p.m. (2-NH2) may be observed. 

Table 36 summarizes the known annular tautomerism data for azoles. The tautomeric preferences of substituted pyrazoles and imidazoles can be rationalized in terms of the differential substituent effect on the acidity of the two NFI groups in the conjugate acid, e.g. in (138 EWS = electron-withdrawing substituent) the 2-NFI is more acidic than 1-NFI and hence for the neutral form the 3-substituted pyrazole is the more stable. 

Representative chemical shifts from the large amount of available data on isothiazoles are included in Table 4. The chemical shifts of the ring hydrogens depend on electron density, ring currents and substituent anisotropies, and substituent effects can usually be predicted, at least qualitatively, by comparison with other aromatic systems. The resonance of H(5) is usually at a lower field than that of H(3) but in some cases this order is reversed. As is discussed later (Section 4.17.3.4) the chemical shift of H(5) is more sensitive to substitution in the 4-position than is that of H(3), and it is also worth noting that the resonance of H(5) is shifted downfield (typically 0.5 p.p.m.) when DMSO is used as solvent, a reflection of the ability of this hydrogen atom to interact with proton acceptors. This matter is discussed again in Section 4.17.3.7. 

Substituent effects (substituent increments) tabulated in more detail in the literature demonstrate that C chemical shifts of individual carbon nuclei in alkenes and aromatic as well as heteroaromatic compounds can be predicted approximately by means of mesomeric effects (resonance effects). Thus, an electron donor substituent D [D = OC//j, SC//j, N(C//j)2] attached to a C=C double bond shields the (l-C atom and the -proton (+M effect, smaller shift), whereas the a-position is deshielded (larger shift) as a result of substituent electronegativity (-/ effect). 

Substituent effects on intermediates can also be analyzed by MO methods. Take, for example, methyl cations where adjacent substituents with lone pairs of electrons can form 71 bonds, as can be expressed in either valence bond or MO terminology. 

Notice that the MO picture gives the same qualitative picture of the substituent effects as described by resonance structures. The amino group is pictured by resonance as an electron donor which causes a buildup of electron density at the /3 carbon, whereas the formyl group is an electron acceptor which diminishes electron density at the /3 carbon. 

This is opposite from the order in solution as revealed by the pK data in water and DMSO shown in Table 4.14. These changes in relative acidity can again be traced to solvation effects. In the gas phase, any substituent effect can be analyzed directly in terms of its stabilizing or destabilizing effect on the anion. Replacement of hydrogen by alkyl substituents normally increases electron density at the site of substitution, but this effect cannot be the dominant one, because it would lead to an ordering of gas-phase acidity opposite to that observed. The dominant effect is believed to be polarizability. The methyl... 

There are two opposing substituent effects on this reaction. Electron-attracting aiyl substituents favor the deprotonation but disfavor the elimination step. The observed substituent effects are small, and under some conditions the Hammett plot is nonlinear. 

The transition state involves six partially delocalized electrons being transformed from one 1,5-diene system to another. The transition state could range in character from a 1,4-diradical to two nearly independent allyl radicals, depending on whether bond making or bond breaking is more advanced. The general framework for understanding the substituent effects is that the reactions are concerted with a relatively late transition state with well-developed C(l)—C(6) bonds. 

It has long been known that the Diels-Alder reaction is particularly efficient and rapid when the dienophile contains one or more electron-attracting groups. These substituent effects are illustrated by the data in Table 11.3. In the case of the diene, reactivity is increased by electron-releasing substituents. Some illustrative data are given in Table 11.4. 

More complete interpretations of Diels-Alder regioselectivity have been developed. MO results can be analyzed from an electrostatic perspective by calculating potentials at the various atoms in the diene and dienophile. These results give a more quantitatively accurate estimate of the substituent effects. Diels-Alder regioselectivity can also be accounted for in terms of HSAB theory (see Section 1.2.3). The expectation would be that the most polarizable (softest) atoms would lead to bond formation and that regioselectivity would reflect the best mateh between the diene and dienophile termini. These ideas have been applied using 3-2IG computations. The results are in agreement with the ortho rule for normal-electron-demand Diels-Alder reactions. ... 

---