Subject Gibbs,

When this occurs, he suggested permutting the component subscripts or using "another differential coefficient of the same general form." He noted that Eq. (1) is the criterion of the limit of stability (i.e., the spinodal surface). In an earlier discussion on that subject, Gibbs showed that all of the following partial derivatives vanish on the spinodal surface. 

The general criterion of chemical reaction equiUbria is the same as that for phase equiUbria, namely that the total Gibbs energy of a closed system be a minimum at constant, uniform T and P (eq. 212). If the T and P of a siagle-phase, chemically reactive system are constant, then the quantities capable of change are the mole numbers, n. The iadependentiy variable quantities are just the r reaction coordinates, and thus the equiUbrium state is characterized by the rnecessary derivative conditions (and subject to the material balance constraints of equation 235) where j = 1,11,.. ., r ... 

Because experimental measurements are subject to systematic error, sets of values of In y and In yg determined by experiment may not satisfy, that is, may not be consistent with, the Gibbs/Duhem equation. Thus, Eq. (4-289) applied to sets of experimental values becomes a test of the thermodynamic consistency of the data, rather than a valid general relationship. 

Worth noting is the fact that Barkers method does not require experimental yf values. Thus the correlating parameters Ot, b, and so on, can be ev uated from a P-X data subset. Common practice now is, in fact, to measure just such data. They are, of course, not subject to a test for consistency by the Gibbs/Duhem equation. The worlds store of X T.E data has been compiled by Gmehling et al. (Vapor-Liquid Lquilibiium Data Collection, Chemistiy Data Series, vol. I, parts 1-8, DECHEMA, Frankfurt am Main, 1979-1990). 

The Gibbs free energy is named for Josiah Willard Gibbs (Fig. 7.23), the nineteenth-century American physicist who was responsible for turning thermodynamics from an abstract theory into a subject of great usefulness. 

The appreciation of the importance of adsorption phenomena at liquid interfaces is probably as old as human history, since it is easily recognized in many facets of everyday life. It is not surprising that liquid interfaces have been a favorite subject of scientific interest since as early as the eighteenth century [3,4], From an experimental point of view, one obvious virtue of the liquid interfaces for studying adsorption phenomena is that we can use surface tension or interfacial tension for thermodynamic analysis of the surface properties. The interfacial tension is related to the adsorbed amount of surface active substances through the Gibbs adsorption equation. 

The structure of hydrogels that do not contain ionic moieties can be analyzed by the Flory Rehner theory (Flory and Rehner 1943a). This combination of thermodynamic and elasticity theories states that a cross-linked polymer gel which is immersed in a fluid and allowed to reach equilibrium with its surroundings is subject only to two opposing forces, the thermodynamic force of mixing and the retractive force of the polymer chains. At equilibrium, these two forces are equal. Equation (1) describes the physical situation in terms of the Gibbs free energy. 

Molecules in the surface or interfacial region are subject to attractive forces from adjacent molecules, which result in an attraction into the bulk phase. The attraction tends to reduce the number of molecules in the surface region (increase in inter-molecular distance). Hence work must be done to bring molecules from the interior to the interface. The minimum work required to create a differential increment in surface dA is ydA, where A is the interfacial area and y is the surface tension or interfacial tension. One also refers to y as the interfacial Gibbs free energy for the condition of constant temperature, T, pression, P, and composition (n = number of moles)... 

Since reaction 14 can be considered similar to reaction 13, approximations between EA and Gibbs free-energy are possible this subject has been reviewed by Kebarle and Chowdhury40. 

Here fif (T) is the Gibbs free energy per mole of an ideal gas at temperature T and standard pressure P°. Thus the condition of equilibrium for a gas phase system subject to a chemical reaction (Equation 4.36), whether at constant T and P or constant T and V, is given by... 

Many friends have asked why a new edition of a thermodynamics text is necessary, because the subject has not changed basically since the work of J. Willard Gibbs. One answer is given by the statement of Lord Rayleigh in a letter to Gibbs, ... 

Donnan equilibrium phys chem The particular eq ul 11 bri u m set up when two coexisting phases are subject to the restriction that one or more of the ionic components cannot pass from one phase into the other commonly, this restriction is caused by a membrane which is permeable to the solvent and small ions but impermeable to colloidal ions or charged particles of colloidal size. Also known as Gibbs-Donnan equilibrium. dO-non e-kwo lib-re-om ... 

The Gibbs adsorption theory (Birdi, 1989,1999, 2002, 2008 Defay et al., 1966 Chattoraj and Birdi, 1984) considers the surface of liquids to be monolayer. The surface tension of water decreases appreciably on the addition of very small quantities of soaps and detergents. The Gibbs adsorption theory relates the change in surface tension to the change in soap concentration. The experiments that analyze the spread monolayers are also based on one molecular layer. The latter data indeed conclusively verifies the Gibbs assumption (as described later). Detergents (soaps, etc.) and other similar kind of molecules are found to exhibit self-assembly characteristics. The subject related to self-assembly monolayer (SAM) structures will be treated extensively (Birdi, 1999). However, no procedure exists that can provide information by direct measurement. The composition of the surface of a solution with two components or more would require additional comments. 

Schofield Phil. Mag. March, 1926) has recently verified this relation by direct experiment. In order to appreciate the significance of this result, it is necessary to consider in more detail the electrical potential difference V and the manner in which it arises. Instead of regarding the phenomenon from the point of view of the Gibbs equation, it has been, until recently, more usual to discuss the subject of electro-capillarity from the conceptions developed by Helmholtz and Lippmann. These views, together with the theory of electrolytic solution pressure advanced by Nemst, are not in reality incompatible with the principles of adsorption at interfaces as laid down by Gibbs. 

Whilst the conditions of equilibrium for such systems were clearly enunciated by J. Willard Gibbs and Sir J. J. Thomson a great impetus was given to the subject by supplementing the formal thermodynamic treatment with a clearer visualisation of the molecular structure of surfaces by Sir W. B. Hardy and I. Langmuir. 

Gibbs Phase Rule. The goal of this section section is to predict what wiU happen to our element when it is subjected to changes in those variables that we can manipulate, usually temperature and pressure. For example, what happens when we heat a sample of pure sulfur It will probably melt at some point. What happens when we subject carbon to very high pressures We predict that diamond will form. We seek quantitative explanations of these phenomena and an ability to predict under what conditions they will occur. 

Knowing the standard molar Gibbs free energy values and giving an initial mole number vector the determination of the equilibrium composition consists of minimizing (2.72) subject to the linear constraints (2.73). The direct application of (2.69-2.70), however, would be rather complicated. In the... 

Another interpretation of the electrocapillary curve is easily obtained from Equation (89). We wish to investigate the effect of changes in the concentration of the aqueous phase on the interfacial tension at constant applied potential. Several assumptions are made at this point to simplify the desired result. More comprehensive treatments of this subject may be consulted for additional details (e.g., Overbeek 1952). We assume that (a) the aqueous phase contains only 1 1 electrolyte, (b) the solution is sufficiently dilute to neglect activity coefficients, (c) the composition of the metallic phase (and therefore jt,Hg) is constant, (d) only the potential drop at the mercury-solution interface is affected by the composition of the solution, and (e) the Gibbs dividing surface can be located in such a way as to make the surface excess equal to zero for all uncharged components (T, = 0). With these assumptions, Equation (89) becomes... 

---