Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Structure refinement, basic models

The first half of this chapter concentrates on the mechanisms of ion conduction. A basic model of ion transport is presented which contains the essential features necessary to describe conduction in the different classes of solid electrolyte. The model is based on the isolated hopping of the mobile ions in addition, brief mention is made of the influence of ion interactions between both the mobile ions and the immobile ions of the solid lattice (ion hopping) and between different mobile ions. The latter leads to either ion ordering or the formation of a more dynamic structure, the ion atmosphere. It is likely that in solid electrolytes, such ion interactions and cooperative ion movements are important and must be taken into account if a quantitative description of ionic conductivity is to be attempted. In this chapter, the emphasis is on presenting the basic elements of ion transport and comparing ionic conductivity in different classes of solid electrolyte which possess different gross structural features. Refinements of the basic model presented here are then described in Chapter 3. [Pg.7]

The model that we have developed for the structure of atoms has been further refined. This more sophisticated model, known as the quantum mechanical model, retains most of the general features that we have deduced for atomic structure. Within this model, the electrons in atoms occupy specific regions of space known as orbitals, with a maximum of two electrons occupying each orbital. There are three orbitals in a/ subshell and one orbital in each s subshell. The idea that the two electrons in a given orbital must have opposite spins was first proposed by Wolfgang Pauli in 1925, and is known as the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Most general chemistry texts have some discussion of these ideas. An interesting introduction to the ideas of quantum mechanics can be found in Sections 3.13 and 3.15 of Chemistry Structure Dynamics, by J. N. Spencer, G. M. Bodner, and L. H. Rickard (Fourth Edition). You should read the appropriate sections of your text to become familiar with the terms and basic ideas of this model. [Pg.67]

In conclusion, one could say that despite the lack of experimental data with which the copolymer model predictive powers could be tested, its trends when applied to the VCM/VAc system were very reasonable and in agreement with general experience from systems of this type. There are certain aspects of the model (e.g. the expression for the xc of the system) that should be refined in the near future, but at least the basic structure... [Pg.229]

Before data from the Galileo mission became available, the interior structure of the moon was still basically unknown. Hie data obtained during two encounters of the probe with Europa (E4 and E6) on December 19, 1996, and February 20, 1997 (Anderson et al., 1997), indicated the presence of an inner core with a density of 4,000 kg/m3. This could be a metal core with a radius of about 40% of that of the moon, surrounded by a rock mantle with a density of 3,000-3,500 kg/m3. Two further approaches of the probe to Europa made refinement of the model possible (Anderson et al., 1998), and they concluded that the moon s interior may consist of a mixture of silicates and metals. If the moon does in fact have a metallic core, estimation of its diameter is not possible because of its unknown composition. [Pg.51]

A framework can abstract the description of a generic type, a family of mutually dependent types, a collaboration, a refinement pattern, the modeling constructs themselves, and even a bundle of fundamental generic properties (associative, commutative, and so on). Frameworks are themselves built on other frameworks. At the most basic level, the structure of frameworks represents the basis for the organization of all models. [Pg.365]

Clearly, precision must be a small fraction of resolution and any structural model must fit column position within a few picometer as shown in Figures 3 and 6. Deviations from this rule indicate the need to refine structural models, the presence of systematic errors, or an over interpretations of data. Unfortunately, this basic rule is sometimes disregarded by ignoring mismatches of up to 1 A = 100 pm . Systematic errors often relate to the presence of scanning noise, sample tilt, or to unfavorable specimen geometry for an exit wave reconstruction... [Pg.26]

Basic concepts of interaction have been refined as new models could be established. The fields of applications were broadened. Currently, the detection of enantiomers by fluorescence measurements and by direct optical methods are well-investigated topics. By introducing various functional groups to established skeletal structures, highly specific recognition of enantiomers is likely to be achieved. Those methods based on recognition by polymer-bonded selectors will continue to profit from advances in modern chromatographic methods. [Pg.340]

The evaluation of kinetic properties of NRPS systems is a problem of generally underestimated complexity. The basic path was established in 1971, defining activation, thiolation, and peptidyl transfers as basic reactions. The further refinement from structural data to establish the multiple carrier model, and now to tackle domain interactions, has added some precision to the questions asked. However, we have not yet arrived at a complete kinetic description of even the simple tripeptide synthetase. The ACV synthetase operates with four different substrates at six binding sites, releasing 3 moles of AMP and 3 moles of MgPPi for each ACV formed at optimal conditions [51], A sequence of 10 reactions has been... [Pg.12]

Various refinements of the above model have been proposed for example, using alternative spherical potentials or allowing for nonspherical perturbations,and these can improve the agreement of the model with the abundance peaks observed in different experimental spectra. For small alkali metal clusters, the results are essentially equivalent to those obtained by TSH theory, for the simple reason that both approaches start from an assumption of zeroth-order spherical symmetry. This connection has been emphasized in two reviews,and also holds to some extent when considerations of symmetry breaking are applied. This aspect is discussed further below. The same shell structure is also observed in simple Hiickel calculations for alkali metals, again basically due to the symmetry of the systems considered. However, the developments of TSH theory, below, and the assumptions made in the jellium model itself, should make it clear that the latter approach is only likely to be successful for alkali and perhaps alkali earth metals. For example, recent results for aluminium clusters have led to the suggestion that symmetry-breaking effects are more important in these systems. ... [Pg.1217]

An additional major problem with natural membrane systems is that the composition of the one-dimensional unit cell may be unknown because of the presence of proteins of unknown structure and composition. Nevertheless, it is possible to model the electron density profile of a multilamellar system to arrive at a crude model for the distribution of lipids and proteins. The models improve considerably if the lipid composition and lipid stmctures are known. In any case, the basic crystallographic structural method is used The model is refined on the basis of comparisons between the calculated and the experimentally determined intensities through an iterative process. [Pg.46]

The least-squares method is a very powerful tool, provided the model is sufficiently close to the true structure. If the initial model is basically correct, the shifts in parameters indicated by the least-squares refinement will drive the energy of the structure to a global minimum. Unfortunately, if the model is not quite correct, the least-squares refinement will produce a structure that is trapped in a local minimum of energy which is not the true structure (see Figure 10.12). This problem manifests itself by monitoring the R value. Often there is a hint of trouble in that the R value is higher than expected and will not decrease to acceptable values. Several crystal structures have been reported with this type of problem, but they are generally corrected in the subsequent literature. [Pg.405]


See other pages where Structure refinement, basic models is mentioned: [Pg.118]    [Pg.1770]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.794]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.1866]    [Pg.1872]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.202]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.1872 ]




SEARCH



Basic structure

Basicity structures

Model refinement

STRUCTURE REFINING

Structural refinement

Structure refinement

© 2024 chempedia.info