Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Structure-property relationships experimental models

Estimation of log P by using quantitative structure property relationships (QSPR) modeling and molecular descriptors (described above) has resulted in a number of highly accurate methods. Methods involving MLR, PLS, and artificial neural network ensembles (ANNE) modeling have been reviewed.In summary, estimation of partition coefficient has now reached a stage where the error associated with estimation is approximately equal to experimental error and reliable estimates can be obtained in silico. [Pg.369]

The above description of 2PA processes corresponds to a simplified essential state model which is widely used to analyze the structure-properties relationship of 2PA materials [8]. In practice, this theoretical approach is in a good agreement with experimental data for different types of organic compounds [54-56]. [Pg.121]

In this paper, an overview of the origin of second-order nonlinear optical processes in molecular and thin film materials is presented. The tutorial begins with a discussion of the basic physical description of second-order nonlinear optical processes. Simple models are used to describe molecular responses and propagation characteristics of polarization and field components. A brief discussion of quantum mechanical approaches is followed by a discussion of the 2-level model and some structure property relationships are illustrated. The relationships between microscopic and macroscopic nonlinearities in crystals, polymers, and molecular assemblies are discussed. Finally, several of the more common experimental methods for determining nonlinear optical coefficients are reviewed. [Pg.37]

In contrast, the emerging theme in knowledge based modelling is an ever closer intertwining of modelling and experimentation. A powerful combination of three factors contribute to this theme (i) structure-property relationships that are based on better models and more relevant structural descriptors (ii) robotics techniques in experimentation, which lead to a real explosion in the amount of data available (iii) informatics tools, which can handle the large amounts of data generated by both experiment and simulation. [Pg.244]

QSPR models (quantitative structure-property relationship) are derived from simple-descriptors and correlated to a set of experimental data. Examples are estimation of physico-chemical properties, ADME or toxicity properties. [Pg.570]

As with the development of new catalysts, effective new materials benefit from a thorough understanding of structure/property relationships. This involves multiscale modeling and experimental efforts in surface science, including morphology. Enabling the use of new materials will also require extensive development of new nano- and microfabrication techniques, including biodirected or self-assembly syntheses. [Pg.24]

This chapter reviews the theoretical modelling of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and their activated metabolites in the light of the accumulated experimental evidence for their modes of genotoxic action. PAH s form a large class of molecules which are ubiquitous in human environment, i.e., urban air, car exhaust, cigarette smoke or barbecued food, and encompass an immense variety of structural types. It is no surprise that their structure-property relationships have been of continuous interest to theoreticians. In fact, PAH s have served as the testing field for many of the approximations used in MO and VB calculations [32-39]. [Pg.450]

The detailed proof of this conceptual model is difficult experimentally, although it is generally supported by the existing experimental data and melt spinning process model. The overall veracity of the model is less important than the utility of the model in predicting process-structure-property relationships. Important implications of the model are as follows ... [Pg.10]

The most widely used methods to predict aqueous solubility from molecular structure are quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPRs) [4-6], which are empirical models that use experimental data to learn a statistical relationship between the physical property of interest (i.e., solubility) and molecular descriptors calculable from a simple computational representation of the molecule (e.g., counts of atoms or functional groups, polar surface area, and molecular dipole moment) [1], The current... [Pg.263]

From an experimental perspective, systematic structure-property relationship studies of high performance polymer blends are needed to completely define the polymer features that lead to miscible mixtures. One of the primary focuses of those studies should be continued quantification of the molecular features, both entropic and enthalpic in nature, responsible for miscibility. Such quantitative input can, then, be used as information in theoretical developments. The entire process should be regarded as highly iterative in nature in the sense that theoretical predictions can be made, tested experimentally, and the results of the experimental work should lead to revised models that can make additional predictions. [Pg.1479]

New concepts combining micromechanical models with the macromechanics of composite bodies were able to explain experimental data and predict limits of mechanical properties. Proposed models were used as the link between micro-and macromechanics of the composite body. In the calculations, in addition to properties of the matrix and the filler, properties and spatial arrangement of the interphase have been included (5). This model allows for a prediction of the structure-property relationships in PP filled wifh randomly distributed core-shell inclusions with EIL shell. This is of a pivotal importance in an attempt to develop and manufacture materials tailored to a particular end-use application. [Pg.369]


See other pages where Structure-property relationships experimental models is mentioned: [Pg.859]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.758]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.705]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.761]    [Pg.688]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.509]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.6 , Pg.7 , Pg.8 , Pg.9 , Pg.10 , Pg.11 , Pg.12 , Pg.13 , Pg.14 , Pg.15 , Pg.16 , Pg.17 , Pg.18 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.6 , Pg.7 , Pg.8 , Pg.9 , Pg.10 , Pg.11 , Pg.12 , Pg.13 , Pg.14 , Pg.15 , Pg.16 , Pg.17 , Pg.18 ]




SEARCH



Experimental Modeling

Experimental models

Modelling experimental

Properties models

Property modelling

Property relationships

STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES RELATIONSHIP

Structure-property modeling

© 2024 chempedia.info